Posted on 01/26/2010 2:17:50 PM PST by rabscuttle385
I’m not as prescient as some here. I actually though she was more clever than this. When does the “Stupid Party” grow a pair and say ENOUGH already. RINOs kill the party, and they must be held to account. Where would you like to draw your line in the sand? Now’s as good a time as any.
__________________________________________
That's right...she quit.
No, Medina has a very long and rambling statement on her site that neither you nor I can make sense of, your excerpt was like the main statement, unclear. Post her entire statement, maybe other freepers can unlock it for us.
EXACTLY. I think these posts are from out and out Liberals to distract people.
So attacking McCains command and control
LOL Oh the melodrama!
I completely agree.
Palin is in it for the quick buck and then she will get out of public life. McCain probably wrote her a bigger check then JD.
Maybe O’Keefe should have bugged McCain’s phone so we could hear what goes on between Sarah and mcCain.
“Using your analogy, if Jesus endorsed Satan, wouldnt you possibly consider that there is a reasoning for that endorsement beyond your understanding or would you just damn Jesus?”
No. I’d be wondering if whom I thought was Jesus wasn’t actually Satan in disguise.
If you want to see wtc911 sticking up for candidates, then you need to look in the Giuliani and Romney threads.
wtc911 isn’t big on conservatives, especially social conservatives.
Hey, don’t blame it on the liberal media.
This is a conservative problem. We split up the conservative vote last election and we may do it again.
Realistically, it’s either going to be Palin or Romney, barring a Mr. Smith goes to Washington miracle.
Just don’t whine about RINOs when you kick Palin to the curb.
Note: I don’t consider the 1 %’rs really relavent to the conservative cause or political equation. I’m talking about the relavent conservatives.
Only a deaf, dumb and blind apostate could spin going from 90% to 53% approval as a victory.
The only thing that stopped that slide was resignation.
I can’t believe you’re actually arguing this point.
Great observation, MM.
I’m amazed at how many FReepers consider Scott Brown to be the second coming of Jesus Christ, while Sarah Palin is now the devil incarnate.
Take a look at their past performance, not what you think they’ll do tomorrow.
That’s probably the message Palin is trying sending out to the independents with her endorsement of McCain — “she really is a progressive conservative just like McCain.” She knows her base will stay with her through thick and thin, so why not spend a little political capital early and try and win over a few independents?
I don’t think it’s going to turn out that way. I think she has seriously underestimated the significance of both the AZ primary and her part in it. And if McCain does actually win, the political price Sarah Palin will pay for her support for McCain now might become astronomical in her own primary.
ex animio
davidfarrar
quit is a good description for Romney.
He quit on his responsibility as an American citizen,
sitting in Paris while Americans did their duty fighting
in Viet Nam
His 5 sons have never served their country in the military.
Thanks for the bump. My only disappointment is that I doubt many will slog through a 500+ post to understand the despicale nature of it all.
It’s all very confusing...Palin is Reagan and everyone is gaga, then bam she’s a backstabbing RINO...now some guy named Hayworth is Reagan...and the whole time Romney is rubbing his hands together like Snidely Whiplash...magritte
Her low point was dropping to 54% which is very good numbers, when she resigned she was back up to 56% and her disapproval was plummeting. (after the media gave her some, before the veep race her disapproval was almost non existent.)
Palin was assured of reelection with numbers like hers, let's compare her to a guy that you approve of and supported.
“Im amazed at how many FReepers consider Scott Brown to be the second coming of Jesus Christ, while Sarah Palin is now the devil incarnate.”
Brown never hid who he was. Palin rode to the forefront on a platform of “commonsense conservatism”. If that means supporting RINO’s then we don’t need any of Palin’s commonsense.
Palin has to listen to US, not us to PALIN as you recommend. She is not a Queen, she is not a messiah, she is just the same as any politician we know.
2 scoobey snacks to anyone who knows the reference to which I allude. I’ll give youa clue, last week I was able to meet and talk with Ted Neeley in person.
“Palin was assured of reelection with numbers like hers, let’s compare her to a guy that you approve of and supported.”
I was a Fred Thompson fan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.