Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women's Rights Groups: Your Double Standard is Showing (Palin on the CBS Tebow ad)
Facebook ^ | 01/26/2010 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 01/27/2010 12:08:55 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007

Women’s Rights groups, like NOW, commendably call out advertisers and networks for airing sexist and demeaning portrayals of women that lead to young women’s diminished self-esteem and acceptance of roles as mere sexed-up objects.

What a ridiculous situation they’re getting themselves into now with their protest of CBS airing a pro-life ad during the upcoming Super Bowl game. The ad will feature Heisman trophy winner Tim Tebow and his mom, and they’ll speak to the sanctity of life and the beautiful potential within every innocent child as Mrs. Tebow acknowledges her choice to give Tim life, despite less than ideal circumstances. Messages like this empower women! This speaks to the strength and commitment and nurturing spirit within women. The message says everything positive and nothing negative about the power of women – and life. Evidently, some women’s rights groups like NOW do not like that message.

NOW is looking at the pro-life issue backwards. Women should be reminded that they are strong enough and smart enough to make decisions that allow for career and educational opportunities while still giving their babies a chance at life. In my own home, my daughter Bristol has also been challenged by pro-abortion “women’s rights” groups who don’t agree with her decision to have her baby, nor do they like the abstinence message which she articulated as her personal commitment. NOW could gain ground and credibility with everyday Americans, thus allowing their pro-women message to be heard by more than just their ardent supporters, if they made wiser decisions regarding which battles to pick. They should call attention to and embrace the Tebow’s message, instead of covertly and overtly disrespecting what Mrs. Tebow, Bristol, and millions of other women have chosen to do (in less than ideal circumstances).

My message to these groups who are inexplicably offended by a pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life message airing during the Super Bowl: please concentrate on empowering women, help with efforts to prevent unexpected pregnancies, stay consistent with your message that for too long women have been made to feel like sex objects in our “modern” culture and that we can expect better in 2010. But don’t let your double standard glare so vividly as to undo some of the good to which you could contribute.

And CBS: just do the right thing. Don’t cave. Have the backbone to run the ad.

To the Tebows: thank you. America is listening. We appreciate you.

- Sarah Palin


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doublestandard; palin; prolifeads; sarahpalin; superbowl; superbowlads; tebow

1 posted on 01/27/2010 12:08:57 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; SolidWood

Sarah ping.


2 posted on 01/27/2010 12:09:59 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
Women’s Rights groups, like NOW, commendably call out advertisers and networks for airing sexist and demeaning portrayals of women that lead to young women’s diminished self-esteem and acceptance of roles as mere sexed-up objects.

They do? This must keep them busier than a pack of bird dogs.

3 posted on 01/27/2010 12:27:09 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Go Sarah!

4 posted on 01/27/2010 12:30:13 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

She almost sounds as if NOW is a great organization were it not for this one little flaw about abortion. Quite the contrary. And, for example, note their defense of Bill Clinton over having sex with an employee more than half his age.

Sarah either is naive or she’s trying to persuade NOW by choosing to highlight what she thinks are their positives - sort of like praising Mussolini for his devotion to train punctuality.


5 posted on 01/27/2010 1:00:15 AM PST by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Sensible people could suggest that the ad encourages people to make a choice for life. The opposition to this ad doesn’t want people to make such a choice. So for pro-choice people, there is no choice.

God, expose the lies coming from these people. Don’t stop until every lie is utterly exposed. Do it in our lifetimes so that we can relish in their defeat.


6 posted on 01/27/2010 1:01:58 AM PST by WKTimpco (Traditional Values Counter Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I agree. She is trying to change them. Or splinter them.

After all - as the ex-leader of Planned Parenthood can attest - sometimes lefties hear the truth.


7 posted on 01/27/2010 1:18:37 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

My goodness, that littlest girl is just as cute as can be.


8 posted on 01/27/2010 2:03:15 AM PST by I still care (A Republic - if you can keep it. - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Sarah Palin is commenting on one particular organisation and its stance on one particular issue. Specifics always work better than generalisms.

I thought “Barack” meant “Blessing”?


9 posted on 01/27/2010 2:05:23 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

The only choice NOW approves of is to abort the baby.


10 posted on 01/27/2010 2:21:27 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
The funniest part about this whole curfuffle is that the NOW Nags and their groupies are whining and moaning about a commercial that is not anti-abortion but pro-life.

It really shows what they truly want.

11 posted on 01/27/2010 2:29:46 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Marsha Coakley's been teabagged. Congrats Scott Brown! Mary Jo finally got even.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

that’s My President Speaking...


12 posted on 01/27/2010 3:33:29 AM PST by The Wizard (I support Madam President, the only President in America today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Women’s rights groups are all about power for the group. They couldn’t care two $hit$ about a woman’s rights.


13 posted on 01/27/2010 3:46:31 AM PST by rfreedom4u (Obama is intent on destroying America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

> sort of like praising Mussolini for his devotion to train punctuality.

LOL!!!

My dad grew up in Mussolini’s Italy. He was able to emigrate to the US when he was about 14.

He told me that when he was growing up, if anybody asked you what you thought of Mussolini, the safest thing to say was, “He makes the trains run on time.”

When Mussolini came to power, the Italian train system was the laughing stock of Europe. How did he get the trains to run on time?

Soldiers were posted at the train stations. If any train arrived late, the entire crew was marched to a siding and executed immediately, in front of everybody at the train station.

That only had to happen a couple of times.


14 posted on 01/27/2010 3:57:53 AM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

I saw the nags on the news last night calling the ad hate desguised as love.

since when is it hate to chose life, rather than death?


15 posted on 01/27/2010 4:05:04 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
Sarah either is naive or she’s trying to persuade NOW by choosing to highlight what she thinks are their positives - sort of like praising Mussolini for his devotion to train punctuality.
. . . or else she is showing moderates that NOW is extreme . . .

16 posted on 01/27/2010 4:09:43 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Pro choice is fine and dandy as long as the choice is for abortion.


17 posted on 01/27/2010 4:17:52 AM PST by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood; euram; SoCalPol; WVKayaker; ak267; Two Kids' Dad; Soul Seeker; Hojczyk; Republic; ...

(((PING)))


18 posted on 01/27/2010 4:22:46 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Wonderful message! Too bad that so many people are afraid of Sarah’s common sense and plain talk.


19 posted on 01/27/2010 4:26:13 AM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
NOW and the women's lib movement are directly responsible for the degrading culture of young women today. Their 'sexual freedom and equality' lie has turned young women into the very thing they didn't want- sexual objects.

Sarah hit this one square on. But we all know NOW isn't for empowering all women- just women who are pro abortion (and liberal).

20 posted on 01/27/2010 4:27:50 AM PST by rintense (Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Didn’t get that tone at all. In fact, I got an admonishment, almost sarcastic tone from this. She knows they’re a bunk organization, so why not use their own alleged philosophy of empowering women against them? Brilliant.


21 posted on 01/27/2010 4:29:35 AM PST by rintense (Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

I think CBS is just trying to provide “balance” for its selection of a registered sex-offender as half-time entertainment.


22 posted on 01/27/2010 4:46:22 AM PST by Ozone34 ("There are only two philosophies: Thomism and bullshitism!" -Leon Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Sometimes you appeal to an opponent’s better nature in public even though you know they’ll never do the right thing. It keeps you on the high road and highlights how easily they could do the right thing. It’s ffective rhetoric. Keep in mind that whether she runs for President or just promotes conservatism, winning over independents and other people who think these groups are mainly or somewhat positive is going to be necessary.


23 posted on 01/27/2010 5:32:14 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Exactly.

BTW, I almost wish the Packers needed a good quarterback, because having Tim Tebow aboard would be awesome.


24 posted on 01/27/2010 5:35:59 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Focus on the Family deserves credit for publicity of Tebow family story.. Let them ba a witness !!!


25 posted on 01/27/2010 6:55:55 AM PST by Broker (Darwin's gods are dangerous men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Focus on the Family deserves credit for publicity of Tebow family story.. Let them be a witness !!!


26 posted on 01/27/2010 6:56:15 AM PST by Broker (Darwin's gods are dangerous men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I understand what you mean! But I think Sarah is casting light on the inherent contradictions in NOW’s position -— not only about abortion but about their whole agenda.

On the one hand, NOW promotes women as strong, smart, etc. But then they pivot and say women are so incompetent at managing their lives that they have to kill their babies. NOW says we can handle the presidency, but can’t handle a pregnancy.

Sarah cuts right through that. She rightly points out that it’s a woman’s strength that empowers her to uphold the integrity of her principles through an untimely or difficult pregnancy, to get on brilliantly with her own life without sacrificing her child.


27 posted on 01/27/2010 7:09:20 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
they’ll speak to the sanctity of life and the beautiful potential within every innocent child ... Evidently, some women’s rights groups like NOW do not like that message

NOW is going protest against children?

That's a pretty tough position to defend.

28 posted on 01/27/2010 7:37:30 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

No, “Barack” is the sound my dog makes when he throws up...


29 posted on 01/27/2010 7:40:55 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

What a beautiful family. It confounds me that they inspire so much hatred from the left.


30 posted on 01/27/2010 8:50:37 AM PST by rockthecasbah (He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Another image I could well have done without... :)


31 posted on 01/27/2010 8:52:22 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Another image I could well have done without... :)


32 posted on 01/27/2010 8:52:26 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson