Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filmmaker Who Targeted ACORN Appears in Court on Felony Charges
FoxNews.com ^ | January 27,2010 | Eric Shawn and AP

Posted on 01/27/2010 2:06:59 PM PST by ColdOne

Three of four men charged with illegally entering the New Orleans office of Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu returned to court Wednesday for pretrial meetings with authorities.

Suspects Defendants James O'Keefe, Joseph Basel and Stan Dai all carried suitcases and declined comment. The fourth suspect is Robert Flanagan.

Federal authorities said two of the men posed as telephone workers wearing hard hats, tool belts and fluorescent vests when they walked into the senator's office inside a federal building in New Orleans on Monday. The other

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; boughtoff; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; fbi; jamesokeefe; landrieu; landrieuscandal; marylandrieu; pelosicongress; voteforsale; wiretapping

1 posted on 01/27/2010 2:07:00 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

affidavit pdf link

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Affidavit.pdf


2 posted on 01/27/2010 2:08:53 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
There is no allegation of wiretapping mentioned in the FBI affidavit obtained by FoxNews.com.

Aw, that was the juiciest part.

3 posted on 01/27/2010 2:09:56 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Yet the thugs who intimidated voters with clubs were not prosecuted, as per Holder's instructions.....

What a joke.

4 posted on 01/27/2010 2:13:40 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Gulag ACORN-apelago


5 posted on 01/27/2010 2:14:54 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

That was interesting. My big question is why would O’Keefe start filming the two “workers” with his cell phone, if what they were doing or intending to do was commit a crime? It doesn’t make sense. There’s more to this story than’s been revealed.


6 posted on 01/27/2010 2:16:59 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Where was this type of investigation when democrat operatives actually recorded the cell phone conversations of 2 Republican senators/representatives during the Clintoon administration? The consequences--if any--were minor to the democrats involved.

Secondly, O'Keefe is represented by the FBI to have aided and abetted the 2 phoney repairmen. Does video recording of any individual in a public building constitute "aiding and abetting"? I don't think so. Did O'Keefe participate in the manipulation of the phones, or block any staffer's view of activities performed by the repairmen? I don't think so. If I witness a bank robbery and take photos of the robbers with my cell phone am I aiding and abetting them? If ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC or CNN did this ( and they have done stuff like this before) they would be screaming "Hands off us! We're Investigative Journalists".

Another left-wing media double standard.

7 posted on 01/27/2010 2:21:17 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I don’t believe these guys really broke the law. They’re being railroaded by the pro-Commie liberals in the FBI and the Justice Department.

And if they did break the law, they did it for a good reason - to expose corruption in the Louisiana Democrat Party. That’s more important than the law.


8 posted on 01/27/2010 2:22:05 PM PST by RogerQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Sounds pretty stupid to me unless this is what they wanted.


9 posted on 01/27/2010 2:23:22 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem

Hey now, the old coots who taped Newt Gingrich’s phone call(s) were eventually fined $500.


10 posted on 01/27/2010 2:23:37 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Keep on truckin', Senator Brown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem
I agree.
What happened to investigative journalism?
11 posted on 01/27/2010 2:26:31 PM PST by GranTorino (Bloody Lips Save Ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
The actors were filmed making a call to one of their cellphones on Landrieu's reception area phone. They then made a call from that cellphone back to the reception area phone.

This proved Landrieu and her staff were lying about their phone system being out of order.

12 posted on 01/27/2010 2:27:21 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Sounds like this should get kicked down to ‘disorderly conduct’ or ‘tresspassing’ at most. I’m pretty sure this is going to fall apart for the prosecuting side rather quickly.


13 posted on 01/27/2010 2:35:14 PM PST by brent13a (You're a Great American! NO you're a Great American! NO NO NO YOU'RE a Great American! Nooo.....WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
THATS the felony?

Notice the dramatic "wiretapping" charge has been quietly dropped.

14 posted on 01/27/2010 2:35:24 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Week-a$$ charges and even weaker probable cause is a specialty of the federal gubmint.


15 posted on 01/27/2010 2:39:23 PM PST by brent13a (You're a Great American! NO you're a Great American! NO NO NO YOU'RE a Great American! Nooo.....WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Does anybody want to bet on who is going to get hit harder and sooner: James O'Keefe for his filming of Mary Landrieu's office workers, or David Kernell for hacking into Sarah Palin's Yahoo email account and distributing her private emails on the internet?

-PJ

16 posted on 01/27/2010 2:40:47 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yep, I heard that today....something about a video he was making having to do with a rally outside her office the day before?

Evidently the protesters were complaining about the phone system being shut down to ignore them.

Remember those silly vids he did in college?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4hrnbhIHDY

Maybe they took it too far this time.


17 posted on 01/27/2010 2:41:51 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me.—Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Maybe a stupid question, but why did they bring suitcases? Is that in anticipation of spending the night in jail?

Also, just out of curiosity, how much is the bail for something like this?


18 posted on 01/27/2010 2:41:57 PM PST by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camerongood210

Suitcases ... I think they were going to Guantanimo for waterboarding.


19 posted on 01/27/2010 2:48:11 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Put em away for 50 years


20 posted on 01/27/2010 2:48:12 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/200687.php

My O’Keefe Theory

Since everyone else is running with their smears, hopes, fears, rampant wild speculation (a lot documented at Patterico’s site), etc., I thought I’d throw our what I think is a somewhat reasonable theory as to what James O’Keefe and company were doing in Sen. Landrieu’s office.

Looking at the affidavit, I noticed an interesting fact on page 2, section 6:

BASEL requested to be given access to a telephone in the office, and WITNESS 1 allowed him access to the main telephone at the reception desk. WITNESS 1 observed BASEL take the handset of the phone and manipulate it. BASEL also tried to call the phone with a cellular phone in his possession. He stated that he could not get through.

Now. If Basel is telling the truth, then it lends credence to the fact that people calling the reception desk telephone at Landrieu’s office could also not get through to the main phone.

As such, I am postulating that the group was trying to document (with video camera) that Landrieu’s office had either disconnected or re-routed the phones to deflect incoming calls - hence, why they couldn’t get through. There have been anecdotal reports that Landrieu’s office has received complaints that it has been inaccessible by phone, particularly around the time when she was bought off by the Democrats for the now-infamous Louisiana


21 posted on 01/27/2010 2:54:11 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: brent13a
My bet is more towards the $15 fine. Landrieu might well have the whole business dropped (and have you and I pay for their legal fees) rather than have this continue.

Her people have falsely told her constituents that the phones don't work ~ but obviously the phones do work!

22 posted on 01/27/2010 3:00:19 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Frequently the return number on one of these courtesy phone operations is not posted on the handset. That's so you won't be calling in on it later ~ which is very annoying ~ and idiots do keep the last number they saw moreso than the last number they were told to call.

In most cases you have to pick it up on an incoming cellphone call to find out what it is ~ unless, of course, the PBX jockey has rigged it to give you the DIN, then you're sunk!

The sequence of the filming operation strongly suggests they succeeded in making a call out, and then returning it to the same number. If one of them said they couldnt' get a call, I'd want to hear a tape!

23 posted on 01/27/2010 3:04:55 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
BTW, they didn't "lie" to get in. It's an open office within a federal building. If asked you tell the guards what office you are going to. She has an invitation out to visit her offices.

If they told lies later, it's not about getting in.

24 posted on 01/27/2010 3:09:02 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

I’m not so sure being arrested and charged with a felony was or was not in O’Keefe’s plan, but recall how the ‘roll out’ of the ACORN scandal was handled. One tape released, furor from the left, denial of any untoward behavior, it was aberrant, etc. Then another tape release, and another, until all excuses were exhausted and ACORN was locked into its position. There may be a method to what appears as O’Keefe’s ‘madness.’


25 posted on 01/27/2010 3:11:30 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: camerongood210
Maybe a stupid question, but why did they bring suitcases? Is that in anticipation of spending the night in jail?

Probably because they were finished with their business in NO and going home after the hearing.

26 posted on 01/27/2010 3:12:17 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The US marshals show up so they had been following James or wiretapping him. I cann not see the office worker picking up the phone and call in the Feds. If he was wiretapped how could the justice dept authorize this. In Calif there was a tape where our Attorney General Brown told Acorn not to worry for they either had them covered and the outcome known or the fix was in.


27 posted on 01/27/2010 3:16:49 PM PST by wmposh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: camerongood210

Hmmm—what does O’Keefe know that we don’t....


28 posted on 01/27/2010 3:17:25 PM PST by GeezerConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
A variation that makes more sense. Due to the heavy incoming phone traffic (from people POd at the old bat) the office manager's had the PBX gurus set the phones to report a busy signal on all incoming calls, but the office workers could continue to make outgoing calls for ordinary office business.

Supplement that with a bit of work with your cellphone and you could do office business as though nothing was wrong.

So, that's the view from inside the office.

Now, the next thing ~ someone didn't believe the phones were all busy in all the offices so they visited one of 'em.

The first thing they did was try an outgoing call to their cellphone numbers. That worked.

Then, they tried an inbound call from their cellphones. That didn't work (hence the alleged witness saying one of them allegedly said he didn't get a call).

It all makes sense now.

O'Keefe could have stopped right there if he knew something about modern computer driven PBX operations because he proved they'd set their phones to report "busy" on all incoming calls.

Obviously he didn't know what he needed to know about PBX operations and he continued the trick when he should have simply left.

BTW, that scenario accounts for the office geeks being able to contact the US Marshalls and the FBI to come on down and get these people. They'd still be able to escape in time though the second the call didn't go through.

In the future O'Keefe should consult with people who know how to work PBXs.

29 posted on 01/27/2010 3:23:50 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Very good! Sounds plausible to me...this kid has moxie that's for sure.

Good to see that on our side for a change, let's hope he learns some lessons from this, and I hope he does not go to jail.

30 posted on 01/27/2010 3:52:47 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: woofie
"Put em away for 50 years."

Why?

31 posted on 01/27/2010 5:38:54 PM PST by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

Its obvious he is a right winger


32 posted on 01/27/2010 5:50:41 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Are you a troll?


33 posted on 01/27/2010 7:29:37 PM PST by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

sarcasm ...look it up on google

you are flat out pathetic.


34 posted on 01/27/2010 8:09:43 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: woofie

/s


35 posted on 01/28/2010 3:40:53 AM PST by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
"As such, I am postulating that the group was trying to document (with video camera) that Landrieu’s office had either disconnected or re-routed the phones to deflect incoming calls - hence, why they couldn’t get through. There have been anecdotal reports that Landrieu’s office has received complaints that it has been inaccessible by phone, particularly around the time when she was bought off by the Democrats for the now-infamous Louisiana"

Excellent bit of deduction!

I am looking forward to see if you hit the mark. Being a betting man I would lay 2 large that you are very close!

36 posted on 01/28/2010 3:47:37 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: woofie

Good idea to add an “/s” when adding sarcasm. I was thinking the same thing.


37 posted on 01/28/2010 3:54:33 AM PST by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson