The contention that they sought access to the telephone closet was not an invention of the "state run media", it was in the official police report. It was a contention of Witness 1 to the police.
If it's not true, its not the mainstream media's fabrication, but either the arresting officer or the witness.
My mistake. Thank you for pointing out my error.
Now does the report say that “he” went into the closet? Or was it the other people who did?
The Feds are going to need more than 1 witness.
“If it’s not true, its not the mainstream media’s fabrication, but either the arresting officer or the witness.”
Well - that means they only had 2 or 3 major errors/lies in their stories vs. 3 or 4. And oh by the way, there is no qualitative difference between a RAT’s Senate staff (of which the witness is one) and the RAT press. So whether the RAT staff made up a charge or the RAT press, falacious charges were FLYING these last 72 hours from the RATs.
We’ll see if the Feds have any case whatsoever against these guys.