Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero

Voluntary manslaughter would have been an alternate finding that the jury could have settled on.

<><><><><><<

Except for the glaring fact that Roeder’s own testimony demonstrated premeditation. Voluntary manslaughter is, if I understand correctly, killing with no premeditation.

How could a jury possibly find him guilty of the lesser charge, given his testimony? The self defense angle in voluntary manslaughter still requires no premeditation to kill. And clearly, there was plenty of premeditation.


28 posted on 01/29/2010 10:17:08 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: dmz

Easy. The jury COULD have ruled it “Justifiable Homicide”.


472 posted on 01/31/2010 6:31:09 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: dmz

I wonder why no jury member considered it a Justifiable Homicide? Or perhaps they did, but had their minds changed?


473 posted on 01/31/2010 8:23:14 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson