Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/29/2010 7:58:57 PM PST by jsdjason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jsdjason

Oops, left out that this was the TEXAS GOP Primary race in the thread title.


2 posted on 01/29/2010 8:00:17 PM PST by jsdjason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jsdjason
Medina won the online vote asking who won the debate with 97% of the vote.

Wow. I didn't watch the debate, but that's impressive for a newcomer, and someone's who's the dark horse in this race.

3 posted on 01/29/2010 8:06:58 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jsdjason

It’s similar to the 92 election with Bush. Clinton and Perot. Governor Perry may not be exactly what I want but I fear KBH would never stand up for Texas against the Washington elite. Democrats will support Medina simply to take votes from Perry and guarantee KBH wins.


13 posted on 01/29/2010 8:52:57 PM PST by BeckB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jsdjason

From Texas Alliance For Life:

DALLAS—In the second Republican gubernatorial debate, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison was once again asked explicitly whether she supported the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. She answered, “No.”

Like those who argue for “making abortion rare” but stand by legalized abortion, Hutchison holds the contradictory positions that limits on abortion are good, but the legalization of abortion should not be overturned.

“At the gubernatorial debate, Senator Hutchison contradicted herself. You cannot be pro-life and support Roe v. Wade,” says Joe Pojman, Ph.D., executive director of Texas Alliance for Life. In 2003, Hutchison showed her support for legalized abortion by voting for a resolution that stated, “It is the sense of the Senate that the decision of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade was appropriate and secures an important constitutional right; and such decision should not be overturned.” (See Senate Roll Call No. 48, 108th Congress, 1st Session.)

Gov. Rick Perry, on the other hand, is on the record as both supporting limits on abortion and supporting overturning Roe v. Wade.

“Texas needs a leader who is consistently pro-life,” continues Pojman. “Unlike Hutchison, Governor Rick Perry has never given an inch to the life-threatening precepts of Roe v. Wade.”

Texas originally passed a law protecting unborn children from abortion in the Nineteenth Century. This law was struck down by Roe in 1973. Today, more than 80,000 abortions per year are performed in Texas (http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/CHS/VSTAT/vs08/t33.shtm).

Gov. Perry has passionately supported laws protecting unborn babies and their mothers. Perry supported the Woman’s Right to Know Act (2003), the Prenatal Protection Act (2003), the parental consent law (2005), and funding for alternatives to abortions (2005, 2007, 2009).

In addition, Gov. Perry has also strongly endorsed public funding for adult stem cell research. He has opposed embryonic stem cell research, which has developed no treatments or cures and requires the destruction of human embryos. Adult stem cells have been used to successfully treat more than 20,000 Americans and more than 70 different conditions or diseases. Sen. Hutchison, on the other hand, has twice voted to use federal tax dollars for embryonic stem cell research, which requires the destruction of human embryos.


28 posted on 01/29/2010 10:45:34 PM PST by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jsdjason
Medina won the online vote asking who won the debate with 97% of the vote.

An online vote with that much of number is more likely to be influenced by supporters voting multiple times rather than a snapshot of whom people think won the debate.

44 posted on 01/30/2010 1:26:12 AM PST by paudio (Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson