Skip to comments.Open Homosexuality in the Military is a Disaster and May Cause Further Natural Disasters
Posted on 02/01/2010 8:03:50 PM PST by DesertRenegade
When Americans are suffering economically and millions need jobs, it's shocking that the Administration is focused on its ultra-liberal militantly homosexualist agenda forcing the highlighting of homosexuals and homosexuality on an unwilling military. This is the equivalent of the spiritual rape of our military to satisfy the most extreme and selfish cadre of President Obama's kooky coalition.
We agree with Eileen Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness that this will hurt the cohesiveness of the military, cause many to leave the army, and dramatically lower the number of recruits, perhaps leading to the reinstatement of a compulsory draft.
Thirteen months before 9/11, on the day New York City passed homosexual domestic partnership regulations, I joined a group of Rabbis at a City Hall prayer service, pleading with G-d not to visit disaster on the city of N.Y. We have seen the underground earthquake, tsunami, Katrina, and now Haiti. All this is in sync with a two thousand year old teaching in the Talmud that the practice of homosexuality is a spiritual cause of earthquakes. Once a disaster is unleashed, innocents are also victims just like in Chernobyl.
We plead with saner heads in Congress and the Pentagon to stop sodomization of our military and our society. Enough is enough.
(Excerpt) Read more at christiannewswire.com ...
To progressive Dems, the Military has always been a social experiment. I suggest that our Military only protect those of us who want protection. The ones that want a social experiment need to be victims of that social experiment.
Israel and the UK have had homosexuals serving in the IDF for years now, with no loss of military readiness. I’m anti gay “marriage” but don’t understand Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.
Fred Phelps, is that you?
He is, and I fear the American people will support him on this in the name of liberal “tolerance”. Isn’t Scott Brown for this too?
Why do I get the feeling this thread might quickly spiral out of control and get pulled?
brits serve in the idf? who knew? :^)
“Israel and the UK have had homosexuals serving in the IDF for years now, with no loss of military readiness.”
I beg to differ. Not sure if you’ve ever served, but our military is far superior to those of Europe. We have by far the most well trained and highly skilled military units in the worlds. Why in the world would someone want to introduce open homosexuality into the barrack, showers, and sleeping quarters unless they were determined to undermine unit cohesion. Something no one has ever been able to answer is this: if open homosexuals should be allowed to shower with other nude males, then are we going to allow normal red-blooded male soldiers to shower with nude women? Why or why not?
Well IMHO...ever since the Gays came out of the CLoset into society, changing the ideals of what family is, what morality is, diminishing the role of Mother and Father, our Country has been in a downward spiral......
I was not aware that NYC was hit by a tsunami, a hurricane and one of those "underground" earthquakes.
Something no one has ever been able to answer is this: if open homosexuals should be allowed to shower with other nude males, then are we going to allow normal red-blooded male soldiers to shower with nude women? Why or why not?
or what about all of our trangendered folk, who are men but feel like they are women, and want to shower with the ladies?
no doubt our military will rank right up there with Italy and Netherlands after this
I'm Israeli and I have served. I don't want to get into the kind of chest-thumpin "my army is better than yours" claptrap, but I don't think most people think of the Israeli Defence Forces as being wimpy or poorly trained -- despite the fact that homosexuals serve openly in elite units. I've never heard of a male soldier being raped by another soldier in Israel -- and I imagine that would make the news. When you're surrounded by a billion people who want you dead, you don't have the luxury of turning away any loyal soldier capable of aiming a rifle in the right direction.
“Natural disasters caused by gays in the military?”
Well of course.
And if we were to rid the US military of gays, the world would have no more natural disasters.
No disagreement on that point. But it's a LO-O-O-O-O-O-ONG way from social/political/economic/moral issues, to natural disasters like Katrina and earthquakes.
I don't buy the connection.
But even if I did.... Among other things, for every homosexual that a natural disaster kills, it also kills 10 times as many straights. God isn't that vindictive or that poor a shot.
More research is needed!! Quick!!! Get me a grant!!!!
At first it was homos in the privacy of a bedroom. Now, it is in our parks, bus stations, parades, schools, workplace etc etc. At first it was just the gays; now it is the gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, transgendered, bestiality types... the list grows on.
Once they allow fags to openly serve in the military, it will be another stepping stone.... the transgendered freaks will complain they are being discriminated against. Soon we will have "dudes" running around in female service skirts and having their own lists of problems. Then we will have to worry about whether "its" can serve in combat arms billets; women can't can some it that had an attachadictomy? Then there will be hetero males getting married to cash in on "family" benefits so they don't have to live in the barraks (the increase in BAH/COMRATS will cause shortfalls and cuts elsewhere).
Sounds like good order and discipline to me. /sarc
So you say UK was “ready” to rescue those captured sailors from Iran by force?
WALTERS: You're a Lieutenant-Colonel. On Wednesday the president announced that he wants to work with Congress to repeal don't ask, don't tell. What's your view? BROWN: I think it's important, because as you know we're fighting two wars right now. And the most -- the first priority is to -- is to -- is to finish the job, and win those wars. I'd like to hear from the Generals in the field -- in the field -- the people that actually work with these soldiers to make sure that, you know, the social change is not going to disrupt our ability to finish the job and complete the wars. WALTERS: But Senator, your own view. BROWN: That's my view. WALTERS: So you can't say whether you're for or against it? BROWN: No. I'm going to wait to speak to the generals on the ground.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.