Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon abandons two-war doctrine
Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | February 2, 2010 | Alex Spillius

Posted on 02/02/2010 12:17:07 PM PST by Schnucki

The US is to abandon its doctrine of always being ready to fight two simultaneous conventional wars.

Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, said instead the Pentagon will shift its focus to a broader range of challenges including terrorism and cyber-security.

In a sweeping review of US military strategy, he said the Pentagon must prepare for an "uncertain security landscape" where extremists or "non-state actors" sought missile technology or weapons of mass destruction.

Warning that US military power faced new limits and constraints, he said that weaponry, tactics and enemies had overtaken the "familiar contingencies that dominated US planning after the Cold War".

"We have learned through painful experience that the wars we fight are seldom the wars that we planned," said Mr Gates, as he presented the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defence Review and the 2011 budget plan to the Senate armed services committee.

"As a result, the United States needs a broad portfolio of military capabilities, with maximum versatility, across the widest possible spectrum of conflict."

Calling for more investment in aerial drones, helicopters and special operations forces, which have proved vital in the Afghan war, he said the military should focus on winning current conflicts, not putative future ones.

The Obama administration is seeking $741 billion (£463 billion) in defence spending for 2011, including £120 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We have, in a sober and clear-eyed way, assessed risk, set priorities, made trade-offs and identified requirements based on plausible real-world threats, scenarios and potential adversaries," said Mr Gates, making his boldest call yet for reform of a military force that dwarfs the rest of the world's.

Challenges looming on the horizon ranged from "the use of sophisticated new technologies to deny our forces access to the global commons of sea, air, space and cyberspace to

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: gates; mullen; obama; pentagon

1 posted on 02/02/2010 12:17:07 PM PST by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

We are so screwed...


2 posted on 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM PST by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

china off the spy list
cutback
homosexuals to serve openly
and now this and they are trying to tell us that they are a friend of the military

what utter crap, they are seeking to destroy a find institution which they hate as it stands for morals and tradition


3 posted on 02/02/2010 12:20:10 PM PST by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Too many resources being wasted flying Nancy Pelosi and Barak Obamski all over the world to address climate change /s


4 posted on 02/02/2010 12:20:18 PM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Now this administration goes to work on taking down the military...scary times...scary scary times.


5 posted on 02/02/2010 12:20:31 PM PST by Explodo (Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Instead, they’re going to celebrate Gay Pride month.


6 posted on 02/02/2010 12:20:33 PM PST by Gapplega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Sic transit gloria Republica


7 posted on 02/02/2010 12:21:44 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gapplega

A whole new definition of the title: “Rainbow Division”.


8 posted on 02/02/2010 12:22:46 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Gates sure is a woosey. Not surprised, just a reconfirmed observation.


9 posted on 02/02/2010 12:23:12 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Collapsing like a house of cards. We have no space program, we can't fight 2 wars. We'll put homosexuals in the military, we're deep in debt, foreign nations don't respect us, and our president is afraid to address an elementary school classroom without a teleprompter.

One year. It only took one year.

10 posted on 02/02/2010 12:23:21 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I was born in America, but now I live in Declinistan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Another piece is put in place.
11 posted on 02/02/2010 12:25:08 PM PST by LasVegasMac (Islam: Bringing the world death and destruction for 1400 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
"We have learned through painful experience that the wars we fight are seldom the wars that we planned,"

"...through painful experince... " ?

That's funny, cause I could have sworn that we had learned that from Scipio or Sun Tzu.

"Man in unique in his ability to learn from the mistakes of others, and in his unwillingness to do so." - Douglas Adams

12 posted on 02/02/2010 12:25:30 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

After decades of our military planning to comfortably win two regional wars simultaneously, Obama has a new plan: Obama’s military will be designed to dramatically lose even one regional war.


13 posted on 02/02/2010 12:25:46 PM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Hrm... so I think I see our strategy. Prepare for and invest in systems for two large conventional wars at the same time anywhere in the World (read ME and E.Asia). Then fight two counterinsurgencies and only begin planning those a year or two INTO the conflicts.

Then.

Announce you will prepare for and invest in systems to protect against asymmetric threats like cyber-warfare and abandon the need to fight multiple conventional wars (’f22 was too expensive people!’). Then wait for Venezuela to attack Columbia, Russia to finish taking over Georgia and attack Ukraine, China to take Taiwan, and North Korea invade South Korea. At least we’ll have openly gay soldiers at the treaty signing right?


14 posted on 02/02/2010 12:27:45 PM PST by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

It willnfall upon the next Republican Prez to rebuild the military. Again.


15 posted on 02/02/2010 12:29:49 PM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Who is Robert Gates trying to emulate - Harold Brown?


16 posted on 02/02/2010 12:29:54 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (The liberals are asking us to give Obama more time. Is 25 to life enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Little confused here, we are going to drop our two-war strategy while we’re engaged in two wars? Seems reasonable and well thought out. Pretty sure Iran likes what Gates is selling.


17 posted on 02/02/2010 12:30:45 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

US military will now strive to be the best in the world as meals on wheels.

So what do we do with a so-called president that lies to get elected then bankrupts the country. Any need to point out what happens when you allow too much power to be concentrated in the federal government?


18 posted on 02/02/2010 12:31:24 PM PST by Tarpon ( ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
I've abandoned my dream of Haggis-On-A-Stick franchises to Deb's Designer Bomb Shelters!

Contact for more information.

19 posted on 02/02/2010 12:35:34 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Started with Lincoln ... “One war at a time.” Guess Obama will finish the job.


20 posted on 02/02/2010 12:39:34 PM PST by Fast Moving Angel (We'll remember in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Translation: The O administration isn't particularly interested in paying for national security or carrying out the policies that would keep this nation safe from its adversaries.
21 posted on 02/02/2010 12:43:58 PM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
"We have learned through painful experience that the wars we fight are seldom the wars that we planned," said Mr Gates, as he presented the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defence Review and the 2011 budget plan to the Senate armed services committee.

Maybe the reason we haven't fought the wars we planned for was our potential adversaries knew we were ready to fight and when them, so they knew better than to start them.

Strength can be the greatest deterrence and thus the best peace keeper.

22 posted on 02/02/2010 12:45:02 PM PST by MrTed ("...at the name of Jesus, every knee will bow...", will it be before or after one's death?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Hmmmm....

This might need some further research.

If, by "Two Wars" they mean two Conventional, all-out, Atlantic/Pacific WWII-style major fronts ..... I gotta say, that I'd doubt we would've been able to that since the 80s.

If, by "Two Wars" they mean two medium-sized Iran and Afghanistan -type conflicts.... that's been a significant drain on our military. Only way that the full-time military has been able to handle it, is by heavily leaning on the Guard.

So, maybe this is a good thing. Better to call the military preparedness level what it *really* is, rather than what the paper-pushers in DC think it represents.

Please note, I mean no disrespect to the current military. I have absolute confidence in their ability to handle whatever is thrown at them, by outside forces, and our own misdirected government bureaucrats. :-) However, regardless of my personal opinion, it's still impossible for even the best military personnel to be in multiple places at the same time. Of late, the gov't (Clinton was great at this, Bush almost as good, dunno about BO yet) likes to chop funding, and simultaneously spread the military as thin as humanly possible, IMHO. Maybe a better definition of capabilities is in order.

23 posted on 02/02/2010 12:45:17 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded

After Obama is done destroying the economic base that made our military possible, we won’t even be able to afford to buy our guys boots. So if you are asking what my strategy is it’s this. Cut taxes, destroy regulation, get the government the hell out of the way and we can be productive again. No more EPA throwing up obstacles to manufacturing and destroying our ability to compete in the market. Get rid of Social Security (Ive paid in my whole life and don’t want the stupid check anyway and I’m 40 ). Get rid of the TSA and just don’t let those bastards into the country. Get rid of Medicare. All the sudden with the horrendous drag on the economy imposed by the public sector gone we can send a man to the moon again, fight two major wars at once, while kicking the Muhammadans ass. That’s my strategy.


24 posted on 02/02/2010 12:45:40 PM PST by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
The US is to abandon its doctrine of always being ready to fight two simultaneous conventional wars.

It's been SOP for the last 7 years.

25 posted on 02/02/2010 12:46:56 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

The two war doctrine is a Cold War anachronism that required re-engineering.


26 posted on 02/02/2010 12:48:34 PM PST by MNSlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Courses in Chinese or Russian recommended.


27 posted on 02/02/2010 12:53:40 PM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNSlim
Wrong, the two-war plan was developed after the cold war. During the Cold war we maintained a three front option. We were capable of defending the homeland, and fighting in the Far East and Near East. The two war option as outlined during the Clinton years was a failure, thus heavy emphasis on the Guard and Reserve.
28 posted on 02/02/2010 1:04:16 PM PST by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

The point of being able to fight two wars is that, if you can’t, then you can never fight one war, because as soon as you start the one war, your enemies know they can launch another war and you can’t do a damn thing about it.


29 posted on 02/02/2010 1:16:26 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb
I've abandoned my dream of Haggis-On-A-Stick franchises to Deb's Designer Bomb Shelters!

Oh DARN! I was so looking forward to that Haggis!

30 posted on 02/02/2010 1:31:12 PM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson