Skip to comments.
US plans crewless automated ghost-frigates
theregister.co.uk ^
| 1/2/2010
| Lewis Page
Posted on 02/03/2010 10:15:38 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: sonofstrangelove
2
posted on
02/03/2010 10:18:43 PM PST
by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: sonofstrangelove
UAV: Unmanned Aquatic Vessel. Most likely controlled via HAARP.
To: sonofstrangelove
No need to sleep. No fear. No families. No pain.
...
No love of country. Terrible idea.
4
posted on
02/03/2010 10:20:05 PM PST
by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
To: sonofstrangelove
Actually most modern ships with up-to-date navigational systems, do this already.
To: sonofstrangelove
Drone anti-sub ships are strikingly good ideas!
6
posted on
02/03/2010 10:22:12 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: DrGunsforHands
They can probably control it either a Naval base or even at the Pentagon via satellite uplink.
7
posted on
02/03/2010 10:23:21 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
8
posted on
02/03/2010 10:23:41 PM PST
by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: sonofstrangelove
Suppose it suddenly disappears, then what?
9
posted on
02/03/2010 10:24:32 PM PST
by
dr_lew
To: sonofstrangelove
Current maritime law for unmanned vessels (ghost ships) offers some interesting angles for salvage of an unmanned ship, though!
10
posted on
02/03/2010 10:24:54 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: dr_lew
Scramble Naval airplanes to find it.
11
posted on
02/03/2010 10:25:22 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: Eyes Unclouded
No bringing back foreign babies from shore leave after the locals enjoy the pleasures of our female sailors.
12
posted on
02/03/2010 10:25:25 PM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: sonofstrangelove
To: sonofstrangelove
I meant to imply that somebody might sink it.
14
posted on
02/03/2010 10:26:46 PM PST
by
dr_lew
To: Southack
Self-reloading destroyers would be efficient as well.
To: dr_lew
I would think that the ship be able to defend itself.
16
posted on
02/03/2010 10:28:25 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
17
posted on
02/03/2010 10:29:43 PM PST
by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: Eyes Unclouded
You forgot one....no unlawful orders...
18
posted on
02/03/2010 10:29:47 PM PST
by
Crim
To: Mount Athos
Think that we are headed toward automation of both our Air Force amd Navy
19
posted on
02/03/2010 10:31:52 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
I would think that the ship be able to defend itself.That's a whole 'nother kettle of fish, isn't it? If you postulate such a capability, why not a whole goddamn unmanned navy?
20
posted on
02/03/2010 10:32:31 PM PST
by
dr_lew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson