Yes that and her own words which you posted on this thread, nowhere does she specify the exceptions to murder the unborn which she apparently supports, why is she trying to hide the fact that she still does support the choice of abortion in certain circumstances. You would think a true conversion from being at one time pro-choice to pro-life would bring her to the awakening that all innocent life is precious.
However political expediency would have her share the abortion views of a large percentage of the population she's trying to win over, Mormons. Her views reflect that of the Mormon Church, NOT the Catholic church which she erroneously claims her abortion view is consistent with, does she not know the Catholic church's position on abortion? And the article claims in the past she donated to Reid's campaign, what's up with that? Do we really need another Kay Bailey Hutchinson in the Senate?
Now you’ve gone from suggesting she’s a Mormon to calling her a Kay Bailey Hutchinson and you don’t even vote in Nevada. Lowden has the experience whereas Tarkanian has a great family name and the voters in Nevada will decide. Either one will beat Reid and that’s what is important.
It serves NO useful purpose for you to try to smear Lowden.