posted on 02/06/2010 3:07:30 PM PST
To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; markomalley; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; ...
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
posted on 02/06/2010 3:08:08 PM PST
("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
Should the pro-marriage votes of Catholics, Baptists and other people of faith in California be disregarded as irrational, discriminatory and unconstitutional?
Why not? Happens all the time in the Ninth Circus. Overturning voters' initiatives is standard, workaday stuff in that court.
posted on 02/06/2010 3:10:40 PM PST
by Cyber Liberty
(I'm Ellie Light!)
Only the bigotry of leftists would ever consider this.
posted on 02/06/2010 3:10:55 PM PST
(It's the People's Seat ! http://www.toomeyforsenate.com)
If this is successful, will we disqualify elections where black candidates lose because the voters were racists? Will we disqualify electios where gay candidates lose because the voters were homophobic? Will we disqualify elections where hispanic candidates lose because the voters were against (illegal) immigration?
Where do these "thought trials" end?
posted on 02/06/2010 3:15:31 PM PST
by Political Junkie Too
("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
They should fast track this to the SCOTUS, so they can smack down the leftist radicals. Again!
posted on 02/06/2010 3:23:54 PM PST
(Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only blind and destructive.)
The real question is whether the court has a right to even hold this trial in the first place.
posted on 02/06/2010 3:42:32 PM PST
(Obama's policy: A thousand points of lies.)
some bimbo was on John Bachelor last night (w/a guest host) on this subject and yapping that it's "a civil rights issue."
I had to turn the radio off.
posted on 02/06/2010 4:00:21 PM PST
by the invisib1e hand
(governance is not sovereignty [paraphrasing Bishop Fulton Sheen].)
They want to play the race card, comparing themselves to Blacks who could not vote in the 1960’s, let’s play it back.
We overturned laws that kept Blacks from voting and now, they desire some sort of new law to prevent religious people from exercising their vote?
posted on 02/06/2010 4:00:35 PM PST
(What happened to the country I fought for?)
posted on 02/06/2010 4:19:29 PM PST
(TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
Wondering if Their Votes Counted
That the votes of Californians on either side did not count is now beyond dispute regardless of how the court decides. The votes were invalidated the moment the case was allowed to proceed.
It is now a bunch of lawyers in various roles whose opinions count, not the people's.
posted on 02/06/2010 4:44:40 PM PST
Torches and pitchforks time!
posted on 02/06/2010 8:47:36 PM PST
(...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson