Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SHOCK CLAIM: Naked Body Scanner Images Of Film Star Printed, Circulated By Airport Staff...
http://www.drudgereport.com ^

Posted on 02/09/2010 9:26:49 AM PST by kcvl

SHOCK CLAIM: Naked Body Scanner Images Of Film Star Printed, Circulated By Airport Staff...

Bollywood in the buff...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bodyscanner; celebrity; india; naked; shahrukhkhan; tsa; ttiuwp

1 posted on 02/09/2010 9:26:49 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Claims on behalf of authorities that naked body scanner images are immediately destroyed after passengers pass through new x-ray backscatter devices have been proven fraudulent after it was revealed that naked images of Indian film star Shahrukh Khan were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London

http://www.prisonplanet.com/exposed-naked-body-scanner-images-of-film-star-printed-circulated.html


2 posted on 02/09/2010 9:27:51 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Well, that was unexpected.


3 posted on 02/09/2010 9:27:55 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

You can bet they do that with the kids too


4 posted on 02/09/2010 9:28:19 AM PST by GeronL (Dignity is earned from yourself. Respect is earned from others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Gross


5 posted on 02/09/2010 9:28:49 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

TSA Union guys?


6 posted on 02/09/2010 9:29:01 AM PST by Obadiah (Democrats and their life partners, the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Xray film is not tall enough to get my full nude scan.


7 posted on 02/09/2010 9:29:31 AM PST by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Nobody could have predicted this would occur!!!!


8 posted on 02/09/2010 9:30:06 AM PST by MichiganConservative (I wouldn't hate the government if it didn't exist. (Evil + Stupid) === Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

UK not US


9 posted on 02/09/2010 9:30:11 AM PST by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

UK


10 posted on 02/09/2010 9:30:17 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Is this just a stimulus for the private jet industry?


11 posted on 02/09/2010 9:30:26 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I wasn't shocked, is there something wrong with me?

Don't Answer That!

12 posted on 02/09/2010 9:57:54 AM PST by BallyBill (WARNING:Taking me serious could cause stress related illness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

You can bet child porn would be rampant with the TSA booger eating morons.


13 posted on 02/09/2010 9:58:08 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Simple solution. Find the SOBs doing it, fire them or throw them in Jail.

It will stop.

14 posted on 02/09/2010 10:00:20 AM PST by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church (...Actually I'm hearing MORE from RCC now! ....) ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Well given that the “naked” scan Drudge posted before was a complete hoax I’m having a hard time buying this. Real scan pictures just plain ain’t sexy.


15 posted on 02/09/2010 10:00:34 AM PST by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2447648/posts


16 posted on 02/09/2010 10:00:36 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Here's Arnold Schwarzenegger's.

17 posted on 02/09/2010 10:02:02 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

18 posted on 02/09/2010 10:04:26 AM PST by eCSMaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
tsa Pictures, Images and Photos

Well, give a bunch of bass fishermen an xray scanner and that's what you get.

19 posted on 02/09/2010 10:17:10 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Ahhhh!

Who’da’thunkit?

[Most of those posting on FR could see this one coming.]


20 posted on 02/09/2010 10:18:45 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

There should be a “Warning: Movie Star is Male!” alert on this thread.


21 posted on 02/09/2010 10:19:34 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
"Shahrukh Khan"

Cue "William Shatner in Star Trek II" photo...

22 posted on 02/09/2010 10:19:55 AM PST by RabidBartender (Rob Scaaf for Missouri State Senate http://schaafforsenate.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota
Simple solution. Find the SOBs doing it, fire them or throw them in Jail.

Better solution: stop invasive scans of people who've done nothing to deserve such intrusions on their privacy. Between Islamic radical lunatics and hysterical government responses, airline travel is becoming almost as invasive and just about as pleasant as a prostate exam.
23 posted on 02/09/2010 10:29:50 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

So fire the people responsible with the caveat. People who do this also gaze at underwear ads in Sears catalogues.


24 posted on 02/09/2010 10:30:26 AM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Confucius say:

“Man who walk through airport metal detector sideways maybe going to Bangkok!”


25 posted on 02/09/2010 10:34:14 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Personal freedom begins when you tell Old Mrs. Grundy to go to Hell." -Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

Bookmark


26 posted on 02/09/2010 10:37:32 AM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I stumbled across this a few years ago researching something else
27 posted on 02/09/2010 10:40:15 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Photos when Sandy Berger stole those files.


28 posted on 02/09/2010 10:42:30 AM PST by New Perspective (My 6 yr old son has Down Syndrome, are you going to kill him too Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

B.S. on the destroy after scanning thing.

Evidence must be kept of those that are detected of having weapons and such, this means the machines DO HAVE the capability to make a recording of the image.

This has potential for abuse all over it, given the TSA goons that we have at airports, as well as muslime males running the scanners, the little pedophile’s that they are . . .

Yuck!!


29 posted on 02/09/2010 10:46:52 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Modern society doesn't care about privacy. The older generation happily turns over their private lives to the government in exchange for the illusion of security, and the younger generation are a bunch of MySpace exhibitionists. Many, many people simply cannot see anything wrong with the TSA nude-o-scopes.

As for flying vs. prostate exams, at least with the prostate exam you know the doctor and you can evaluate his record. Physicians undergo years of training, and have a well-established professional ethos. If he does something untoward, there are state licensing boards and physician rating websites. The TSOs who view the nude-o-scope images are complete strangers and not accountable at all to their subjects. When you step into the body imager, you have literally no control over the image of your body, nor any sure knowledge of what is happening to it--just the assurances of the TSA.

30 posted on 02/09/2010 10:50:06 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Anyone still think that the people who reacted almost violently to the Audi "Green Police" commercials were overreacting?

I did, and now I'm having second thoughts.

The camel's nose was under the tent right after 911, when our "leaders" decided that muslims should not be singled out for speciall attention at airports.

Anyone else agree with me that that was a mistake of monumental proportions?
For a while if a suspicious person was seen in public doing "weird" things, it was not permissible for law enforcement to describe the suspect as middle-eastern-looking.

Stupidity is it's own reward.

If I were elected president, my first executive order would be a new paradigm : All travelers with passports from members of Council of the Islamic Conference, or holding tickets with stopover at any of them, would be subject to total exams of persons and luggage; no exceptions.

ALL other passengers must eat one or more pork rinds provided at the check-in counter. People on the official, voluntary and verified Jewish travel list would be exempt, subject to case by case exemption, based on firm suspicion. All the remainder would be subject to the usual customs contraband checks that exixted prior to 911.

My second Executive Order would be the total ban of Visas for tourism, education or work for any resident of Islamic Conference Countries.

When muslims join the civilized 21st Century World, we can talk about changing the rules.

Spare me the "holier than thou" comments. As Mayor Koch said,

"We're at war with Islam.
"We're gonna be at war for the next 30 years; we're afraid to call them muslim islamic terrorists. We'll call them anything but --because we don't want to alienate muslim countries.

"That's ridiculous!

"Of course the vast majority of muslims --there are a billion, four hundred million -- are not terrorists, but there are hundreds of million who are!

They want to kill every Christian, every Jew, every Hindu who won't convert.
And we ought to put that on the table.
--- Ex-NYC Mayor Ed Koch - On Hannity, Jan 7, 2010

31 posted on 02/09/2010 11:16:11 AM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

;)

32 posted on 02/09/2010 11:22:22 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Here. Shahrukh Khan.
33 posted on 02/09/2010 11:28:26 AM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Even worse, checkout the name of the minister responsible: "UK Transport Secretary Lord Adonis said last week that the images produced by the ..."
34 posted on 02/09/2010 11:36:19 AM PST by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

This thread is useless without X-rays.


35 posted on 02/09/2010 11:39:10 AM PST by Lazamataz (Hey Obama, Can You Hear Me Now....? GOOOOoood......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
Cue "William Shatner in Star Trek II" photo...

You RAAAANGGG??????

36 posted on 02/09/2010 11:43:53 AM PST by Jonah Hex ("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: anglian
Hey, that's the guy from Om Shanti Om!

Greatest 3-hour Bollywood movie ever.

37 posted on 02/09/2010 12:15:20 PM PST by I Buried My Guns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
..Better solution: stop invasive scans of people who've done nothing to deserve such intrusions on their privacy...

No, I disagree. The government HAS a role to play in several areas, especially when it comes to security. I do believe that most people would not mind sacrificing a bit of privacy for safety.

Now, when it comes to "privacy," every time I'm in front of my computer I get this feeling that many are watching everything that I do or write just behind the screen!... now that IS creepy... and I don't hear anyone raising hell about it.

38 posted on 02/09/2010 1:45:33 PM PST by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church (...Actually I'm hearing MORE from RCC now! ....) ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson