Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New NASA: A Path To Anywhere, And Everywhere
Popular Mechanics ^ | February 8th, 2010 | Rand Simberg

Posted on 02/09/2010 12:15:31 PM PST by NonZeroSum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: karnage
Think about this. Its been a quarter of a century, no wait, its been longer. A third of a century since we put man on the moon. Our ability to calculate things has increased from nobody having a computer in their home, to people having computers in their portable phones, which of course are smaller than ones wallet.

What type of magnitude of increase would you say that is? I my opinion if we had pushed ahead, those phones would be even smaller and more powerful now.

But of course with a left wing extremist in the White House, feeding the poor by raping the rich is more important.

Until you don't have anymore rich.

41 posted on 02/09/2010 9:17:41 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Bingo. The big mistake was abandoning the moon and the apollo program.


42 posted on 02/09/2010 9:25:02 PM PST by 38special (I mean come on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

The saddest thing is we couldn’t go to the moon now even if we wanted to. We’ve forgotten how. And we don’t have the rockets to do it. At least, so my scientist friends tell me.


43 posted on 02/09/2010 9:38:44 PM PST by karnage (worn arguments and old attitudes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
If that's true, then a) the Pentagon should pay for it, not NASA and b) Constellation wasn't the way to do it.

You can maintain a manned spaceflight capability without the need for a literal military presence. A civilian program would suffice. Our mere presence on the moon and the ability to get there would guarantee that China nor anyone else could develop a military advantage there without our ability to challenge it. Additionally, it would guarantee our ability to launch a mission to any potentially threatening rocks so that we wouldn't have to leave it up to the Russians to do.
44 posted on 02/15/2010 7:34:54 AM PST by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

It is not a necessary condition for us to do Apollo again to keep the Chinese from owning the moon.


45 posted on 02/16/2010 12:01:52 AM PST by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

They don’t have to literally own it to have an insurmountable economic and tactical advantage because of it. I don’t trust them to abide by treaty stipulations, particularly if they’re the only ones with a presence there, and if they develop HE3-based fusion, you can kiss our children’s future goodbye. As if all that wasn’t enough, we have a very real and present crisis of a potential russian attempt to divert Apophis. Again, that’s something we can’t afford to leave up to foreign nations.


46 posted on 02/16/2010 10:22:17 AM PST by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson