Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angela McGlowan is a Anti-Second Amendment GUN GRABBER!!
Radio The Gallo Show ^ | 02092010 | Gallo Show

Posted on 02/09/2010 1:09:21 PM PST by Fred

Angela McGlawon is a big friggin GUN GRABBER!!!!

Listen to Angela, in her own words - youtube


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; angela; angelamcglowan; banglist; congress; elections; foxnews; gao; goa; mcglowan; mississippi; ms; nra; statesrights; talkradio; teaparty; teapartyexpress; teapartyrebellion
Gallo Radio Show Link http://www.supertalk.fm/pages/5046222.php
1 posted on 02/09/2010 1:09:21 PM PST by Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fred

Who?


2 posted on 02/09/2010 1:18:38 PM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Uh Oh! I live in the First District Of Mississippi and before hearing this I had a good impression of Angela. I did not know how naive she was. No way I want her casting my vote in Washington.


3 posted on 02/09/2010 1:21:09 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
YIKES!! SHE IS SCARY!! ...and obviously stupid RINO material!
4 posted on 02/09/2010 1:24:52 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: domenad; Fred

Yeah, who? Context, please?


5 posted on 02/09/2010 1:26:35 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

She didn’t say she was anti gun. She needs to think what it means when the government knows your business, let’s hope she is capable of learning.

I saw and heard her at the Tea Party in Nashville over the weekend and she gave one of the best speeches. If she were running here I wouldn’t throw her under the bus just yet. She’s probably a whole lot better than what you presently have.


6 posted on 02/09/2010 1:28:23 PM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 112)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

Yeah, context would help here. Anyone as Not Guilty as her deserves the benefit of the doubt.


7 posted on 02/09/2010 1:29:56 PM PST by OKSooner ("He's quite mad, you know." - James Bond to P. Galore in "Goldfinger".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

She sounds really neive on gun control. She claims anyone stockpiling guns is getting ready for a race war. SHE SUCKS!!


8 posted on 02/09/2010 1:31:40 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; All
Gun Grabber so call tea party leader, Angela McGlowan, running for 1st CD in Mississippi
9 posted on 02/09/2010 1:32:06 PM PST by Fred (For Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Call her up. Visit her office. Educate her. If she’s really conservative, she can be convinced by evidence. When CCW was about to be voted on, the rep. for my district was leaning against. He had worked with my wife, so we knew each other. I called him up, and we discussed the hard facts. He voted in favor of La’s first shall-issue CCW legislation (which passed, BTW).


10 posted on 02/09/2010 1:32:09 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Call her up. Visit her office. Educate her. If she’s really conservative, she can be convinced by evidence.

If she can't understand first principles of Second Amendment, she is UNPRICIPLED and very susceptable to saying one thing and doing another when she gets elected. I liked her speech at Tea Party Convention, but she is a GUN GRABBER!!! NEXT! NO THANK YOU ANGELA!!

11 posted on 02/09/2010 1:37:21 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Just another RINO (aka Right-wing Leftist). What do you expect? A Leftist, is a Leftist, is a Leftist. And a Leftist by any other name is a Leftist. Oy!


12 posted on 02/09/2010 1:43:00 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

Well, I’ve been down the political roads for many decades, and I, too, have heard her speak at a Tea Party in the district. She’s impressive, but knowing something about her background, which includes time as a congressional staffer, I don’t think she arrives at her position out of ignorance. Besides that, we already have a declared candidate, a state senator who is a bona fide conservative who has the endorsement of Governor Haley Barbour. I think I’ll leave the effort to change her mind to others.


13 posted on 02/09/2010 1:43:02 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
When she's on Fox you never get to view the whole package and yes she is so not guilty.
14 posted on 02/09/2010 1:43:38 PM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 112)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
"If she can't understand first principles of Second Amendment, she is UNPRICIPLED and very susceptable to saying one thing and doing another when she gets elected."

No, that means she is uneducated, like a large number of younger people today. If you present the facts, and she refuses to listen, THEN you can say she is "unprincipled". Unfortunately, blacks have a hard time understanding what the Second Amendment is all about. Tell her to call up Condeleeza Rice and talk about it.

15 posted on 02/09/2010 1:45:18 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Wow!! This is a shock. This lady comes on Fox and preaches the conservative agenda. Thanks for the post, she's lost all credibility. One would have thought she was more educated with re. the constitution.
16 posted on 02/09/2010 1:45:38 PM PST by kenmcg (uicl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
You’re on the ground there, so I defer to your opinion.
17 posted on 02/09/2010 1:46:05 PM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 112)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog; All

How the hell are the Tea Party gigs getting HIJACKED so soon?? These friggin RINOS love to jump in from of the gravy train....


18 posted on 02/09/2010 1:48:08 PM PST by Fred (For Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Why is it incumbant on the voter to ‘call her up, educate her, convince her?’ Sorry, it’s the other damn way around. If she’s for limiting 2A rights in any way, send her ass to the heap before she gets elected. Sorry, we can’t equivocate this time around. The stakes are just too damn high.


19 posted on 02/09/2010 1:49:46 PM PST by Gaffer ("Profling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

BTW I like Marines. I was one of those Airmen. About a hundred years ago.


20 posted on 02/09/2010 1:50:02 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Whoa, bump to this....


21 posted on 02/09/2010 1:50:42 PM PST by Fred (For Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

send her this:

David Kopel: How the right to arms saved the non-violent civil rights protesters
The Volokh Conspiracy ^ | February 8, 2010 | David Kopel

Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 2:34:53 PM by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2447716/posts

snip:
Later, I worked for years in the Deep South as a full-time civil rights organizer. Like a martyred friend of mine, NAACP staffer Medgar W. Evers, I, too, was on many Klan death lists and I, too, traveled armed: a .38 special Smith and Wesson revolver and a 44/40 Winchester carbine.

The knowledge that I had these weapons and was willing to use them kept enemies at bay. Years later, in a changed Mississippi, this was confirmed by a former prominent leader of the White Knights of the KKK when we had an interesting dinner together at Jackson.

In the 1970s, I was Southside director of the large, privately-funded Chicago Commons Association. Our primary focus involved assisting minority people in developing sensible community organizations — vis-a-vis schools, city services, anti-crime.

We were opposed by white racist organizations (e.g., Nazi Party) and various youth gangs of many sorts. My staff and I received countless death threats, there were arson attacks on our offices, and, on one occasion, men with weapons came to my home and told my wife and children that they intended to kill me. (I happened to be at work.)

Again, I was glad I had many firearms and, again, we guarded our home and let this be known. We responded to hate calls on the telephone by telling the callers we were quite prepared for them.

For Salter, the right to own a handgun was apparently a crucial part of his ability to exercise his right to defend himself and his family, which was a sine qua non of his ability to stay alive in order to exercise his First Amendment rights to advocate for enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.


22 posted on 02/09/2010 1:55:29 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Angela is a Fox News contributor and an author...she was a democrat. Then she had ideas for improving inner city youth and black communities, but when she went to dem politicians with her ideas they were not interested, but the Republicans were interested....she then realized that the dems have no interest in seeing blacks better themselves and want them dependent....

This would explain her “moderate” or RINO views and tendencies...

the key for all of us is to support folks when they are right and call them out when they are wrong, but don’t become blind fans to anyone....that is what I call Fan Club Hollywood politics...it is no good for anyone....

People let us down.... none are perfect...but we also need to forgive sometimes when folks are wrong and not throw the baby out with the bath water....just like we do with people in our personal lives....know who to keep and who to avoid....


23 posted on 02/09/2010 1:56:51 PM PST by eeevil conservative (GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Can we get an IQ check on her before I comment. I don’t want to say anything bad about someone who may be impaired.


24 posted on 02/09/2010 1:58:15 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

Wow, you sound like Dr. Phil.....


25 posted on 02/09/2010 2:02:05 PM PST by Fred (For Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fred

LOL!!

sorry—

my point is that I had many reasons to support Bush, and a lot of reasons he pissed me off....we have to be able to stick to issues, not personalities...

Same with Rush or Beck....I don’t agree with them on everything- both have ticked me off or disappointed me at times...but I don’t bash them... I continue to listen and support them and learn from them...

some folks get their feelings hurt, or disagree with a talkie or a candidate and jump to bash them....just silly to me....

this blind worship of people (or the letter by their name) is what got us into this mess....


26 posted on 02/09/2010 2:07:44 PM PST by eeevil conservative (GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fred
She is no gun grabber. She is just a bit naive about the second amendment. She is pro-CCW and believes in the right to bear arms. She is, if anything in favor of tougher laws and she could easily be convinced to vote the right on those. My own views on guns are not in line with what most Conservatives believe though I believe they are in line with the Constitution.

I believe that the right to possess firearms arms is a right that is bestowed upon everyone. I do not believe that anyone, even convicted felons should be prevented from possessing or carrying firearms.

But I do believe that every crime committed with a firearm should be severely punished. Armed robbery, no less than a decade served behind bars. Armed robbery and someone gets injured a decade and a half served in prison before any parole. Someone dies, a few decades behind bars and that is if you get let out at all. Crimes with firearms where no one is injured and there is no criminal intent should be misdemeanors.

27 posted on 02/09/2010 2:12:45 PM PST by Bad Jack Bauer (Fat and Bald? I was BORN fat and bald, thank you very much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Wow. I listened to the whole thing. What a state-worshiping idiot.


28 posted on 02/09/2010 2:22:49 PM PST by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer; All

Congress does not get to decide how many guns I get to own and if it is too many....not real complicated......

Angela is a big fat opportunist and time waster....


29 posted on 02/09/2010 2:23:51 PM PST by Fred (For Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I must agree with you. Hope we can get the word out fast. “my daddy taught me to shoot when i was seven” - what’s that got to do with pigs in china?
she is totally clue-less on the issue.
And i almost liked her.


30 posted on 02/09/2010 2:31:53 PM PST by wwcj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
"Why is it incumbant on the voter to ‘call her up, educate her, convince her?’ Sorry, it’s the other damn way around."

Because legislators, being only human, can only know so much about any given topic. They may in some cases be experts in limited areas, but it is impossible to be an expert in everything. It is up to those who are experts in the general public to make their expertise available. If folks in favor of gun rights don't, you can bet that the Brady Bunch will fill their ears with good-sounding but bogus "information".

31 posted on 02/09/2010 2:36:17 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

if she doesn’t know already, it is too darn late my friend, if she is wanting to run on my side of politics. it’s almost like a mental disorder when you don’t fully understand the 2nd.
listen to it again...she’s blind on the issue.


32 posted on 02/09/2010 2:36:21 PM PST by wwcj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

THANK YOU!!!


33 posted on 02/09/2010 2:37:00 PM PST by wwcj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer

Actually, I think you will find that your views on guns are exactly in line with what most Conservatives believe. I’m a pretty rabid pro-gun type, and I agree with you on every point you raised. Punish the criminals severely when convicted, and leave the rest of the populace alone.


34 posted on 02/09/2010 2:40:12 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

You can vote for her if you’re predisposed to. I just happen to think that knowing something about the Second Amendment of our most basic document of governance is not ‘specialization’, nor does it require extraordinary study. This is a basic right, granted to us (along with other unalienable rights like freedom by God) and reinforced and elaborated on by the founders in this document. It isn’t rocket science. There isn’t much to wonder about the phrase “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED....” Any other explanation for this is just explaining away a tendency to RINOism.


35 posted on 02/09/2010 2:41:39 PM PST by Gaffer ("Profling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

I’m with you.
we need possible officials who can pass the test NOW!


36 posted on 02/09/2010 2:44:13 PM PST by wwcj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Because legislators, being only human, can only know so much about any given topic.

That's ridiculous. The problem is not that she was lacking in knowledge of factual minutiae about guns or gun control. The 2nd Amendment is 26 words long, and that's all she needs to know about it. If her instincts are to yield additional power and authority to the government at the expense of the individual, that's 180 degrees off of what the Constitution says, and what the Tea Party movement is about.

And if it's unreasonable to expect would-be "legislators" to know even the Bill of Rights, what on earth SHOULD they know?

37 posted on 02/09/2010 2:47:54 PM PST by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Does this chap your backside like it does mine? These two issues: guns / abortion, will tell you more about folks than any other. Stand hard on these and i can trust you with all i have. Waver just a bit, and i won’t trust you. period.


38 posted on 02/09/2010 2:53:12 PM PST by wwcj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Wow, talk about being completely ignorant. angela has lost all credibility.


39 posted on 02/09/2010 2:55:57 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
"You can vote for her if you’re predisposed to."

Since I don't live in Missippi, nor likely to ever, I'm in no position to vote for or against her.

"I just happen to think that knowing something about the Second Amendment of our most basic document of governance is not ‘specialization’, nor does it require extraordinary study. This is a basic right, granted to us (along with other unalienable rights like freedom by God) and reinforced and elaborated on by the founders in this document. It isn’t rocket science. There isn’t much to wonder about the phrase “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED....” Any other explanation for this is just explaining away a tendency to RINOism."

I agree with pretty much all of the above, but lots of folks today are completely clueless about the Constitution, having never been taught, nor know how to educate themselves. In the face of that lack, it is up to those who ARE knowledgeable to make the effort to teach. If the student then refuses to learn, fail them.

40 posted on 02/09/2010 3:09:59 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
"And if it's unreasonable to expect would-be "legislators" to know even the Bill of Rights, what on earth SHOULD they know?"

Sure it's reasonable to expect that, but the facts on the ground are what they are. Most people (especially younger ones) have not been taught even the basic fundamentals of the Constitution.

41 posted on 02/09/2010 3:10:21 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
No, that means she is uneducated, like a large number of younger people today. If you present the facts, and she refuses to listen, THEN you can say she is "unprincipled".

If you listen to the YouTube video, she comes across as a BAD, very BAD listener and sounded like she had already made up her mind, even when challenged by the host on her stand.

42 posted on 02/09/2010 3:58:31 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

She gave the opening speech at the Nashville Tea Party Convention for goodness sake! I don’t think she is a babe in the woods. She thought people were stockpiling guns because they were racist (anti-Obama) and expecting a freakin’ race war! WTF!


43 posted on 02/09/2010 4:01:25 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Sure it's reasonable to expect that, but the facts on the ground are what they are. Most people (especially younger ones) have not been taught even the basic fundamentals of the Constitution.

That's a perfectly sound argument for educating the ignorant masses of the electorate. Evaluating a Congressional candidate is a vastly different proposition.

44 posted on 02/09/2010 4:30:08 PM PST by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
"If you listen to the YouTube video, she comes across as a BAD, very BAD listener and sounded like she had already made up her mind, even when challenged by the host on her stand."

Yeah, I listened to the tape. But a talk show is NOT the place to have a reasoned discussion. I say again...try reason, then decide. A LOT of people who felt just as strongly as she does have had their minds changed (some of them as a result of being victims of crime, but some not).

"She gave the opening speech at the Nashville Tea Party Convention for goodness sake! I don’t think she is a babe in the woods. She thought people were stockpiling guns because they were racist (anti-Obama) and expecting a freakin’ race war! WTF!

Yes, but as I understand it, she started from a point of typical knee-jerk liberalism and has made the journey from there to the Tea Party. Which proves that she is at least somewhat reasonable when presented with facts on the ground. Invite her to a gun club meeting. Let her find out that gun-owners are "just folks".

45 posted on 02/09/2010 4:33:59 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
"Evaluating a Congressional candidate is a vastly different proposition."

Quite a few Congressional candidates are just as ignorant (in certain areas) as any recent high-school graduate.

46 posted on 02/09/2010 4:36:07 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Yes, and WE DO NOT NEED MORE OF THEM.


47 posted on 02/09/2010 4:50:17 PM PST by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; domenad; Fred

48 posted on 02/09/2010 5:00:43 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Big time ping!


49 posted on 02/09/2010 5:01:42 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Fred

This shouldn’t be a liberal issue or a conservative issue, this is a fundamental issue of privacy. The Government doesn’t have “rights”, the people do, such as the right to privacy. It is no one’s business but my own as to how many guns (if any) I have in my house. A gun is just a piece of wood and metal, the Government doesn’t need to know how much wood or metal I keep.


50 posted on 02/09/2010 9:16:32 PM PST by BorisTheBulletDodger (Bang!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson