Skip to comments.
Police: Man with weapons cache was preparing for 'Armageddon'
Globe ^
| Today
| Geisler
Posted on 02/10/2010 9:53:50 AM PST by jessduntno
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-135 last
To: heysean
I have no problem with requiring people to have to register guns.
You will be the first one on the list when they come to get them.
121
posted on
02/10/2010 5:50:58 PM PST
by
guitarplayer1953
(Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
To: Cboldt
Sheesh! And I thought it was just a typo.
122
posted on
02/10/2010 6:43:21 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
(You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... www.filipthishouse2010.com)
To: guitarplayer1953
“You will be the first one on the list when they come to get them.”
The thing is though, nobody’s coming to get my guns, because I own them legally. Zero’s election may make some people think that their 2nd amendment rights are at risk, but in reality that’s pretty far from the truth.
If at some point this country elects someone who really does want to take our legal right to own firearms away, the people who come to take them will be met with firearms, and I’ll likely be killed for using mine against them.
123
posted on
02/10/2010 7:54:40 PM PST
by
heysean
To: heysean
I have no problem with requiring people to have to register guns... Hmmm... It is of course your perogative to think such a thing, but consider these statements:
"I have no problem with requiring people to have to register with the government in order to attend a political event."
"I have no problem with requiring people to have to register with the government in order to attend a church service."
"I have no problem with requiring people to have to register with the government in order to publish on the internet."
"I have no problem with requiring people to have to register with the government to avoid random searches of thier premises."
"I have no problem with requiring people to have to register with the government before attending gatherings of more than three unrelated persons."
I could go on like this all day, but I'm sure you get my drift: a right that you have to apply for and that can be withdrawn at will is not a right at all.
124
posted on
02/11/2010 10:26:52 AM PST
by
jboot
(Let Christ be true and every man a liar.)
To: jboot
I certainly do get your drift, hopefully you got mine too.
125
posted on
02/11/2010 10:31:24 AM PST
by
heysean
To: jessduntno
Wasn’t alive to see that tour, but a great album indeed.
126
posted on
02/11/2010 10:43:35 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(The curtain has fallen, behold the messiah.)
To: heysean
The background check is not the same as registration because no permanent record of gun possession is created. The Federal Government and most States and local jurisdictions are required by law to destroy the background check records after a period of time.
I support (within limits) background checks. I don't support registration. And I'd rather take my chances on criminal having guns that sign my rights away.
127
posted on
02/11/2010 11:10:28 AM PST
by
jboot
(Let Christ be true and every man a liar.)
To: Touch Not the Cat
Ya I don't get that. 20 weapons for Armageddon, doesn't seem like enough.
128
posted on
02/11/2010 5:11:13 PM PST
by
Clinging Bitterly
(We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
To: heysean
If at some point this country elects someone who really does want to take our legal right to own firearms away...
Dude...You do know who Eric Holder is...right? WTF!?
To: CaptSkip
Of course I know who Eric Holder is.
130
posted on
02/12/2010 6:04:44 AM PST
by
heysean
To: jessduntno
In actuality the law enforcement agencies are fearful that Joe the average citizen would do a better job of policing the frontier, its all about job security nowadays baby!
131
posted on
02/12/2010 6:08:06 AM PST
by
Eye of Unk
("Either you are with us or you are for the terrorists." ~~George W. Bush)
To: jboot
The Federal Government and most States and local jurisdictions are required by law to destroy the background check records after a period of time. Did Santa come to your house this year, too?
132
posted on
02/12/2010 6:12:01 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: heysean
Of course I know who Eric Holder is.
He's desperate to end your 2nd Amendment rights ASAP, and is part of the current elected administration...so your...
If at some point this country elects someone who really does want to take our legal right to own firearms away...
...is no longer an 'if', but is a current reality.
To: CaptSkip
I haven’t heard anything like that from him myself...if you have a link to him saying he’s desperate to end the 2nd amendment, I’d definitely check it out.
If he has said that and I just missed it, his position still wouldn’t allow him to do that. He can’t make or change laws. Still though, I’d like to read about that if that’s what he’d desperately like to see happen.
134
posted on
02/12/2010 10:37:44 AM PST
by
heysean
To: heysean
I dont understand...were these illegal or unregistered weapons? No, but having too many legal things just ain't right. People who have too many legal things must be arrested!
135
posted on
02/12/2010 10:40:13 AM PST
by
TChris
("Hello", the politician lied.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-135 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson