Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama czar's 'homo-genda' proposed for U.S. schools
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | February 10, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 02/11/2010 3:35:21 AM PST by Man50D

A homosexual congressman from Colorado has proposed a law critics say would give controversial federal school safety czar Kevin Jennings – a longtime homosexual-rights advocate – almost unlimited authority to mandate indoctrination in public schools at taxpayer expense.

"It doesn't get much more fascist than this! It's a sexual revolutionary's dream," wrote Linda Harvey of Mission America.

Under the legislation by Democrat Rep. Jared Polis, Jennings "can create pro-homosexual programs and policies to their hearts' delight," Harvey wrote.

Jennings founded the "Gay, Lesbian Straight Education Network" and now heads the office of "Safe and Drug Free Schools" at the Department of Education.

Polis' proposal would provide special protections for students who claim they are discriminated against because of their "perceived sexual orientation." The bill would call down the wrath of the federal government on offenders by classifying "actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity" alongside race, color, sex, disability or national origin as factors on which protections are based.

In a statement announcing his proposal, H.R. 4530, Polis said, "Every student has the right to an education free from harassment and violence. This bill will protect the individual freedoms of our students and enshrine the values of equality and opportunity in our classrooms."

But it actually won't, according to an analysis by Harvey. Instead, she said it will allow Jennings a virtual open door to set up whatever pro-homosexual programs he would choose.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 111th; arth; fdrq; homosexualagenda; jaredpolis; publicschools
In 1963 Representative A.S. Herlong Jr of Florida read into the Congressional the Communist Goals from Cleon Skousen's book The Naked Communist. Below are some of those goals.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over
1 posted on 02/11/2010 3:35:22 AM PST by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

May God have mercy on this nation.......


2 posted on 02/11/2010 3:44:34 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
“Obama's Safe School Czar Hid Case of Pedophilia
A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having
homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox
News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That
former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar." It's getting hard
to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for
vetting White House employees has broken down.”



3 posted on 02/11/2010 3:51:03 AM PST by Diogenesis (Alea iacta est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The fruits are taking over while we stand around allowing them to do it.

2% my butt.


4 posted on 02/11/2010 4:13:40 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Gotta ping later.


5 posted on 02/11/2010 4:15:04 AM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee
There needs to be a nationwide stay-at-home movement of all all public school children parents concerned about having a pedophile in charge of education and the agenda he is putting forth for the schools.

This boycott should continue until obama fires this guy and gets the education back to academics rather than social issues such as homosexuality and planned parenthood.

Disgruntled olicemen used to protest by calling in sick with the "blue flu", so perhaps the school children should call in with the "pink flu" until all of this homosexual training and indoctrination stops in public schools.

These are drastic things happening to our kids and our country, and it's going to take drastic measures to put a stop to them.
6 posted on 02/11/2010 4:22:54 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Yet....STOOOOOPID conservatives:

1) Continue to send their kids stoooopidly thinking that their child's government school is different.

2) Continue to believe that if we went back to some magical time ( 1960, 1940, or the little red school house) that government schools would be different.

By the 1960s when I attended school my curriculum was 100% atheistic secular in its worldview with 2 minutes of the Lord's Prayer and one scripture verse in the morning. (Big whoop!) The push for secularism was **ALWAYS** the goal of the Utopian Progressives since the mid-1800s and the curriculum has **always** been in the direction since the beginning.

3) Believe that government schools can be reformed. They can't because government schools **are** socialism. Socialism can't be reformed.

And...**ALL** government schools from the very first that opened in the min-1800s have taught children to be comfortable with taking their neighbor's money for their schooling. Well?...If the government can take money from a neighbor for schooling, why not a thousand other wants and needs.

4) Believe that getting rid of the federal Department of Education or unions will fix the government schools.

Eliminating the Department of Education or unions won't fix the government schools because the training of teachers and curriculum has **ALWAYS** been in the control of the Utopian Progressives since the mid-1800s.

5) Fail to understand that **all** government schools trash First Amendment Rights and teach **all** children to be compliant slaves of the state. ( This was the goal of the Utopian Progressives and industrialists from the beginning in the mid-1800s).

6) Fail to understand that **all** government schools teach children to think and evaluate everything in their school day from a godless point of view. The statistics show that 85% of children from active and weekly church attending families will not be active in their church 2 years after graduation from high school! On the other hand 95% of homeschoolers are active.

Solution:

Conservatives must work to shut down **all** government schools. If vouchers, tax credits, and charters are used to build the infrastructure needed, the goal should always be full privatization with parents paying their tuition of their own children. Charity schools for the poor.

7 posted on 02/11/2010 4:32:40 AM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

“school children should call in with the “pink flu” until all of this homosexual training and indoctrination stops in public schools.”
Your idea is commendable, but I wonder if it is feasible. Public schools mandate a certain number of days necessary to attend, and if the child is over that amount will deny the child credit in classes. If the child’s absence is due to illness, then documentation from medical professionals is necessary. In addition, my feeling is that most families are just not that concerned about homosexuality. They don’t approve of it, but on the other hand, they do not perceive it as any more than something a little weird. That being said, there are families who are disgusted with this ungodly promotion and despite their few numbers (here in NY anyway) should consider homeschooling. Homeschooling can be done even with a parent’s work schedule. I have several friends who homeschool their older children with video conferences via the internet. If enough of these families opt for this alternative, then perhaps some impact might be made.


8 posted on 02/11/2010 4:35:38 AM PST by sueuprising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The public schools of America have served so well as the boot camp for libs/marxists in the past; why give it up now!!!!!


9 posted on 02/11/2010 4:53:22 AM PST by gunnyg (Laddies, We're Behind Enemy Within Lines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

My daughter is in college, but if I had a kid in high school, I’d simply give him/her my blessing to get up and walk out of the homo lesson. If questioned, the answer is “I’m capable of making up my own mind with regard to what is normal and acceptable behavior.”

I for one will NEVER be sympathetic or accepting of this behavior. I won’t watch shows or movies whre it’s pushed at me, I won’t have any close associations with gays, and I WON’T be told there’s something wrong with ME because of my beliefs. In short, I WON’T be told what to think. They’ve been trying for years to guilt us into acceptance, and it won’t work.

Oh, and by the way, I’ll use the word “GAY” whenever, wherever, and however I please.


10 posted on 02/11/2010 4:59:29 AM PST by Mich Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

11 posted on 02/11/2010 5:02:07 AM PST by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Spot on, and I’ve been saying in Canada for years that the government has no business educating our kids, and that schools need to be private, along with everything else.

Unfortunately, Canada is so far down the socialist hellhole, there is no reversal, only way to freedom would be to take provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan out of the confederation and become an independant country


12 posted on 02/11/2010 5:27:12 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot
but if I had a kid in high school, I’d simply give him/her my blessing to get up and walk out of the homo lesson.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Would you like a bandaid for that hemorrhage?

Gay propaganda is subtly woven throughout the curriculum from speculating on which historical figures (even historical scientists), writers, and philosophers may or may not have been gay to gay topics in biology and health and gym classes.

13 posted on 02/11/2010 6:01:02 AM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sueuprising
"Public schools mandate a certain number of days necessary to attend, and if the child is over that amount will deny the child credit in classes. If the child’s absence is due to illness, then documentation from medical professionals is necessary."

Dear Sueuprising,

You should stop for just a minute, and think OUTSIDE the box...exactly what good would a boycott do, if it was BY THEIR RULES? Wouldn't that be "situation normal" and no changes?

Going against their mandate is what makes any boycott work, and remember, they can't flunk all of them, and they can't arrest us all. I'd rather my child flunk out of "government schools" than becomes an experiment for homosexuals.

Your call.
14 posted on 02/11/2010 6:21:22 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: metmom

ping

Kudos to those trying to reform the beast, but... well, I feel like it’s the Puritans vs the Separatists again. Some conservatives think the government schools can be reformed; some of us think they’re lost to us and we need to make sure alternatives like homeschooling and private schools remain viable.


15 posted on 02/11/2010 6:28:22 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
There needs to be a nationwide stay-at-home movement of all all public school children parents concerned about having a pedophile in charge of education and the agenda he is putting forth for the schools.

There should be a nationwide movement to defund public schools. My schools are funded through my property tax still, pay the portion appropriate and escrow the school.

16 posted on 02/11/2010 6:32:12 AM PST by EBH (The warning bell of Freedom is ringing, can you not hear it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

I agree...but you know what would happen. CPS called in, jail time, etc. I’m not sure that many parents have the guts to face the “forces”. The “powers that be”... know that as well...


17 posted on 02/11/2010 6:39:14 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee
"I’m not sure that many parents have the guts to face the “forces”. "

You're probably right...those parents would probably rather see li'l Junior marching in a Gay Pride Parade than get a zero in sex-ed class...Yeah, I'm sure that's what most parents would rather see. /sarc

Maybe you should take a closer look at exactly WHO those "powers that be" are, and what their agenda reall is. Of course, it's just our kids at risk, so we wouldn't want to make any waves, would we? I'm sure they're not worth the trouble.

Maybe we'll all sit up when our daughters' brothers start becoming their sisters.
18 posted on 02/11/2010 6:45:19 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; agrace; AliVeritas; AlmaKing; AngieGal; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

19 posted on 02/11/2010 7:19:43 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: metmom

In MA, H1728 would criminalize criticism of Transgender people. For instance, if a guy in a wig and a dress goes into the Ladies Room at Malden City Hall where my 76 year old mother works and she complains. She could face a $2,500 fine and a year in jail. State Senator Richard Tisei is running for Lt. Governor with Charlie Baker on the Republican ticket. Tisei is a sponsor of the bill and recently came out of the closet after announcing running for state wide office. Whoever aids or incites such criticism is also subject to prosecution. That would include the column I am going to write about it next week. I fail to see how Charlie Baker intends to win the Governorship without the Womens’ Vote. Men in wigs and dresses intruding upon women is a violation of the rights of women.


20 posted on 02/11/2010 7:46:35 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

When you write that column, if you can do it without risking compromising your screen name, post a thread on it and ping wagglebee or little jeremiah for the moral absolutes ping list or DirtyHarryY2K for the Homosexual agenda list.


21 posted on 02/11/2010 7:50:12 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

So for the sake of your agenda you would risk having your children placed in foster “care”? Why not just take them out of school and legally homeschool them?


22 posted on 02/11/2010 7:51:26 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy; betty boop
I fail to see how Charlie Baker intends to win the Governorship without the Womens’ Vote. Men in wigs and dresses intruding upon women is a violation of the rights of women.

Cause he's a lib, no doubt.

The problem they don't see with this is the opportunity for abuse that it opens the doors on.

ANY man can claim to be transgendered and go in a women's room if he wants when all he's looking for in reality is kicks and giggles, or sexually harassing women. Then when they complain, THEY'RE the guilty party and he can file charges against them and make their lives hell after violating them in some way and getting his kicks out of it.

Those guys don't have to actually rape someone to violate them. It can be done verbally or psychologically. And what about the young girls in there if he decides to expose himself?

This is just so wrong on so many levels.

23 posted on 02/11/2010 7:55:04 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
"Why not just take them out of school and legally homeschool them? "

Based on your screen name...that is YOUR agenda...
24 posted on 02/11/2010 8:48:52 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

My agenda isn’t leaving my children vulnerable to social services. Truancy charges will. The other poster wasn’t saying the something shouldn’t be done. They were saying that most parents would disobey the law over it leaving themselves open to losing their children even if it was short term.


25 posted on 02/11/2010 9:00:40 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
"So for the sake of your agenda you would risk having your children placed in foster “care”? "

Sorry, but I had to revisit your post again.

You are the second "mom" who is wringing her hands over what I suggested. I didn't say a thing about "foster care", which is ridiculous.

What you call my "agenda", was just an idea based on the founding of this great country, even the founding of the current "tea party".

You're safe, you're homeschooling, but we now have an education "czar" who is homosexual, a convicted pedophile, and an advocate of educating children in the ways of homosexuality...and you're both worried about them getting a zero in sex-ed.

My SUGGESTION was a total boycott...do you have any idea how man children are enrolled in government schools in this country? Do you really think they have the manpower or the clout to arrest every parent?

A protest is just that, a protest...following the established rules is "consent".

But, I'm wasting my time because you two just don't get it, so have a nice life and when "Marty" wants to change his name to "Mary", remember, you wanted "status quo"

Remember the title of this thread was, "Obama czar's 'homo-genda' proposed for U.S. schools". You obviously don't want your children exposed to it, as you homeschool...but it's ok for the rest of America to expose their children for fear of the cops?
26 posted on 02/11/2010 9:02:33 AM PST by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

“that most parents would disobey”
Should read WOULDN’T DISOBEY.


27 posted on 02/11/2010 9:03:17 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

You have totally misunderstood my post. I am all for you pulling your kids out in protest. I was just saying that when you do that, you should file homeschool paperwork so you will not receive truancy charges. After the school board has conceded to the will of the parents, you can reenroll them if you like. The other poster had a point, there may not be many parents willing to go along. If that is the case having your kids out of school illegally will result in truancy which had resulted in children being removed from the home.


28 posted on 02/11/2010 9:07:32 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot

” I’d simply give him/her my blessing to get up and walk out of the homo lesson. If questioned, the answer is “I’m capable of making up my own mind with regard to what is normal and acceptable behavior.””

There is a lot of wisdom in that but it requires your child have the disposition to do so. I would not only give my child the blessing to to it I would convey that I would be disappointed if they did not!

And the thing I would tell them to say is “I can disagree with a life style choice and not bully the people who make it, so Ill be in the library studying. If you have a problem call my parents..”


29 posted on 02/11/2010 10:33:53 AM PST by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Come on people. We have the might and the numbers why don’t we have the will to turn back the tide on this crap?


30 posted on 02/11/2010 11:28:28 AM PST by Maelstorm (We are umbilicaled to a parasitic beast that feeds off one man so to enslave another to dependency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

You may want to rephrase that...


31 posted on 02/11/2010 12:18:42 PM PST by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Numbers are worth nothing without leadership to direct them.

But we expect nothing from our leaders, and nothing is precisely what we get from them...


32 posted on 02/11/2010 12:20:10 PM PST by LastNorwegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Man50D

Just part of the Gramsci plan to take over our culture in order to rule us:

“These efforts draw upon a blueprint composed by Italian
Communist theoretician Antonio Gramsci (photo), who understood
that the creation of the total state requires the seizure of the
“mediating institutions” that insulate the individual from the
power of the government — the family, organized religion, and
so forth — and a systematic redefinition of the culture in
order to sustain the new political order. The battle cry of
Gramsci’s disciples is: “Capture the culture!”

http://actioninengland.mywowbb.com/forum36/195.html


33 posted on 02/11/2010 4:23:34 PM PST by dervish (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FrankR; christianhomeschoolmommaof3

Actually, the threat of homeschooling is more effective. If you simply pull your child out for a few days, they lose a little money and get it back when they come back, and then they’ll continue on their merry way, trying again at a later date.

Homeschooling cuts the funds completely.

And christianhomeschoolmommaof3 is right. Pull your kids out without a valid reason, and you’re risking a visit from CPS or whatever they call it where you live, and the school district is as likely to do it as not.

And the thinking that if enough people participate, they couldn’t call on everyone doesn’t hole much water. First of all, you’d have to know that you could get enough parents to commit to it to be effective, and I doubt that that is going to happen. The other thing is, there are too many other ways that the school district could get back besides that.


34 posted on 02/11/2010 4:40:20 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot
My daughter is in college, but if I had a kid in high school, I’d simply give him/her my blessing to get up and walk out of the homo lesson. If questioned, the answer is “I’m capable of making up my own mind with regard to what is normal and acceptable behavior.”

The problem is that they are teaching it in the lower grades. Books like Heather Has Two Mommies,How Would You Feel if Your Dad Was Gay, King & King, One Dad, Two Dads, Brown Dad, Blue Dads etc. And the movie, It's Ok to Be Gay....They are teaching our children this cr@p in the lower grades. When Sassy was in school I had a long talk with her teacher & told her my child would go out of the room if she was being taught anything with gay in it. All movies had to have a signed permission slip etc. Now I home school. I love it & so does Sassy.

35 posted on 02/11/2010 6:42:48 PM PST by pandoraou812 (Don't squat with spurs on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot
I save the word gay for it’s original intent, describing a happy feeling. Whenever I refer to someone with a same sex perversion I call them what they are homosexual or lesbian. Calling them “gay” is a deliberate attempt to get people’s mind off of what they do.
36 posted on 02/12/2010 11:09:44 AM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

Really good points...I had no idea they started all that crap so early. No wonder so many parents are turning to the home school solution. Good for you.


37 posted on 02/13/2010 8:40:10 AM PST by Mich Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot
It is very sad that don't children have much of a childhood anymore. I see 5 yr olds dressed up looking like little mini me's with streaked hair to match their mothers. The issue of brand name clothes is in kindergarten.....I see so many kids playing video games. And not as many children playing outside in the snow as there should be. I often wonder where imagination has gone...When I was a child you played outside in all kinds of weather & could make countless things out of a big box.

Besides the gay issues in school, I also forbid Al Gore & his movie to be shown. I was a class mother & I got to see 1st hand how my daughter's school worked. There was no real plan for a terror attack. They made a big stink over parents having background checks & thankfully I am bonded. After quite a bit of help from the FReeper home schoolers I made the leap & never looked back. We do use a online school for days when i am busy but we enjoy learning together & no school is going to tell my child that being gay is ok.

38 posted on 02/13/2010 11:19:14 AM PST by pandoraou812 (Don't squat with spurs on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson