Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainlion
Natural gas liquefies around 3500 pounds where propane is about 150 PSI. The cost of liquefying natural gas uses as much energy as you liquefy. 50% efficiency is not good next to 100% with propane. Would you like a ride on a bus setting on high pressure flammable container? Why not drill for oil and make more refineries? That would be the easy out!
I dunno if your figures are correct, but if so it would seem that a substantial fraction of that 50% "loss" could be recovered in a turbine when the gas was used.

Partial oxidation of natural gas to an alcohol would be more efficient than losing 50% of the energy to compress the gas . . .


39 posted on 02/11/2010 11:40:35 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ( DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I dunno if your figures are correct, but if so it would seem that a substantial fraction of that 50% “loss” could be recovered in a turbine when the gas was used.

I never saw an 18 turbine in an 18 wheeler. Natural gas is OK for stationary engines but I don’t think I would ride a bus powered with that much high pressure fuel. Propane is different. Both are more dangerous and flammable than Diesel.

40 posted on 02/11/2010 11:50:52 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson