Skip to comments.Medina Campaign: Dead End?
Posted on 02/11/2010 12:13:18 PM PST by GeronL
This was a textbook case on how to end a campaign in one interview. Tea Party candidate Debra Medina imploded today on the Glenn Beck radio show. The Republcian candidate for governor is a 9-11 Truther. She said questions still remain. Trail Blazers reported:
TV and radio commentator Glenn Beck dismissed the candidacy of Debra Medina when she left open the door to a conspiracy fringe group that believe the U.S. government might have been behind the 9-11 destruction of the World Trade Center.
Beck, a leading personality for conservatives, asked her point blank if she believed such a theory.
I dont have all the evidence there, Glenn, Medina replied. So Im not in a place I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard. Theres some very good arguments and I think the American people have not seen all the evidence there so Ive not taken a position there.
He then asked if she would disavow people on her campaign team that held such a theory.
Im certainly not into mind control or thought policing people, Medina said. I dont see us having a team of radical individuals, if you will.
When she signed off the program, Beck let out a long Oooh.
I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones.
The question surprised me because it's not relevant to this race or the issues facing Texans. This campaign has always been about private property rights and state sovereignty. It is focused on the issues facing Texans. It is not a vehicle for the 9-11 truth movement or any other group.
The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered by so clearly taking their direction from special interests instead of the people, whether it's Rick Perry and his HPV mandate or Kay Hutchison and voting for the bank bailout. It is absolutely the right and duty of a free people to question their government. Texas does not need another politician who tells you what you want to hear, then violates your liberties and steals your property anyway. I fully expect to be questioned and to be held accountable as Governor, and that's the underlying issue here: should people be questioning their government. And the answer is yes, they should be.
Why did she not give that answer in the first place? Why is that not her automatic position?
I wonder if she did it on purpose as she saw her campaign gaining ground, and was never really interested in doing more than “shaking up” the other candidates.
At least we won’t have a bunch of Freepers bashing Sarah Palin for not endorsing her now.
No one's questioning the "right to question our government".
But accusing the Bush administration of being complicit in an attack on NYC is waaaaaaay more than "questioning our government".
Well, she lost my vote over this.
Because post-interview she realized that her campaign just imploded on a national broadcast...
It was the Cubans.
Typical BS political backpedaling.
She wasn’t asked whether people should be allowed to question the government — she was asked for HER opinion on THIS topic. Her opinion is apparently that “she has an open mind” about the possibility that the Bush Administration was complicit in the 9-11 terrorist attacks.
She’s finished, and she knows it.
Her and McCain could be clones. He always has fulsome talking points to make himself look normal when cornered.
Because it is probably not what she believes and her website is nothing more then CYA.
She should make a decision on the information she DOES have. If everyone (especially governors) waited to make a decision until they were absolutely sure they had every shred of evidence (real or fabricated)—we would all grind to a screeching halt.
She should say something like “Based on what I have read the theory does not make sense to me. If and when credible new evidence comes to light I will evaluate it.”
I am changing my vote to Perry. I don’t care WHAT her lame website statement says.
She said on national TV that maybe the truthers are right.
I hope she loses bigtime and does not force a run-off.
What a disgusting display.
Exactly right. This is nothing but spin. She got caught trying to be politically correct in her answer. She got caught being the politician we all want to NOT be in office. If she truly believed what she wrote (or her campaign wrote for her) then that should have been her answer right off the bat. The question would not have caught her off guard if she had real convictions about the truthers being a bunch of loons.
Well, she had a chance to give that answer in the first place and muffed it. Oh well. There are questions to which there is only one right answer and this was one of them. What I said was “this” but what I meant to say was “that” never works. Just ask John Kerry.
I hire a lot of Mexicans to work for me at different times of the year. I always make sure their papers are in order and I always ask them this question, “If a war broke out between the US and Mexico, what side would you fight on?” There is only one right answer. In fact there is only one right way to answer it. If too much time is taken thinking before giving the right answer, then you are disqualified also.
Medina statement after hemming and hawing on Beck. The lady isn't ready for Texas Prime Time.
Which she did not do
I’m just real glad I’ve got a congressional candidate to vote for that I can trust.
Does kansas get to vote in Texas?
too bad for her...how did she think she’d be able to cover it up? Beck just railed on Jones for this exact thing...Conversatives would have looked like the biggest hypocrites if they’d voted for her. She just wasted a lot of people’s time and money.
I know, I know, "seemingly".
The Kay Bailey Hutchison Campaign, threatened with coming in 3rd before the trainwreck, has wasted no time splicing the interview into a robocall.
I wish I was there to NOT vote for her...
But Palin has endorsed Rand Paul in Kentucky. Does Rand Paul believe in 9/11 Trutherism? Perhaps Beck will ask him next. We shall see.
OK, not only is Debra Medina a Paulbot, she’s either a 9-11 Truther or a fellow traveler. Here’s the audio from her 4-minute interview with Glenn Beck: http://www.therightscoop.com/debra-medina-is-a-911-truther/
So, Rick Perry doesn’t look so bad anymore, huh? : )
Beck, a leading personality for conservatives,
Since when is Glen Beck a "leading personality" for conservatives?
Cripes Almighty, all he is is another dumbed-down radio talk show shock jock doing hatchet jobs for a paycheck.
The dipwad doesn't even have the jouralistic credentials or integrity of a biased liberal buffoon like Keith Olbermann.
“At least we wont have a bunch of Freepers bashing Sarah Palin for not endorsing her now.”
yeah she made the right call here. But Rand Paul is an even bigger Paultard than Medina.
I agree with nearly everything in this post.
People around here are being extraordinary naive.
More than anything, we owe Beck a word of thanks for asking the RIGHT question.
He asked her a question, and she answered. Not really a hatchet job.
This is hitting the local news sites:
where were all you medina supporters at when Van Jones was getting hammered for being a truther?? And no I’m no Jones supporter but if your going to be consistent then there should have some freepers supporting Jones “questioning of the goverment” and I don’t recall any.
She was doing pretty good up to that point. I liked what she had to say. She was talking about having a consumption tax vs. the high property tax. Then boom, it all ended with one question.
I will say one thing in her defense. I would not automatically fire someone who was a 9/11 truther in my administration. As long as they are not policy makers and do not go public and damage my administration. If some secretary in my administration believes it, I really don’t care. That’s their business.
“Not really a hatchet job.”
Perry is a RINO and will disappoint folks—guaranteed.
We have shot at electing someone who will represent our values in Medina.
She will not cave like Perry does.
But, hey, if the same ‘ol half-*ss Republican is what you wish for, then Perry is the RINO for you.
I know who 0bama would vote for, if had to make the choice.
“I dont have all the evidence there, Glenn, Medina replied. So Im not in a place I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard. Theres some very good arguments and I think the American people have not seen all the evidence there so Ive not taken a position there.
Well, she was surprised,OK, but it hints at her convictions. If she thought the Truthers were moonbats and the whole theory ludicrous, she would have popped that out instead of this “better look into it” stuff.
So, Medina, how about dynamiting levies in NOLA? Or, to go back a ways, which studio do you think the moon landings were filmed in? Global Warming Consensus, yes or no?
Fr is not a blog.
Medina’s response to that question is another anecdotal example of the stupidity of politicians.
Just because a politician has conservative tendancies, does not make a politician brilliant.
Too many politicians are dumb as rocks.
I don’t have a dog in this fight, since I don’t live in Texas. But I think her answer does give an indication of her thought processes.
So unless you personally have combed through every scrap of the 10-mile high pile of evidence, your opinion is invalid? That's absurd.
National Radio. Not TV.
No sir. She blew it. This a more than a little like those who question whether FDR knew that the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbour, or that Stanton was involved in Lincoln’s murder.
At least we wont have a bunch of Freepers bashing Sarah Palin for not endorsing her now.
Ain't that the truth... :-)
There was a chance that KBH could have come in 3rd after 17 years in Washington. dang.
You bet on the wrong horse.
I am a Texan now, so yes....get a vote.
What amazes me I see lot of people supporting Medina on varioius message boards, saying Beck took her comments out of context.
Frankly, I don’t know how you can take out of context a women saying she couldn’t take a position on whether the government was involved in 9/11.
She said she felt ambushed, but it was a question that should have been a slam dunk and would have dispelled rumors already out there from what I understand about her being a truther.
She failed the test miserably.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.