Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Deficits Become Dangerous
Wall Street Journal ^ | February 11, 2010 | Michael J. Boskin

Posted on 02/12/2010 11:00:12 AM PST by reaganaut1

President Barack Obama's 2011 budget lays out a stunningly expensive big-government spending agenda, mostly to be paid for years down the road. He proposes to increase capital gains, dividend, payroll, income and energy taxes. But the enormous deficits and endless accumulation of debt will eventually force growth-inhibiting income tax hikes, a national value-added tax similar to those in Europe, or severe inflation.

On average, in the first three years of the 10-year budget plan, federal spending rises by 4.4% of GDP. That's more than during President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society and Vietnam War buildup and President Ronald Reagan's defense buildup combined. In those same three years, spending on average hits the highest level in American history (25.1% of GDP), save the peak of World War II. The average deficit of $1.4 trillion (9.6% of GDP) is over three times the previous 2008 record.

Remarkably, President Obama will add more red ink in his first two years than President George W. Bush—berated by conservatives for his failure to control domestic spending and by liberals for the explosion of military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan—did in eight. In his first 15 months, Mr. Obama will raise the debt burden—the ratio of the national debt to GDP—by more than Reagan did in eight years.

...

Two factors greatly compound the risk from Mr. Obama's budget plan. He is running up this debt and current and future taxes just as the baby boomers are retiring and the entitlement cost problems are growing, which will necessitate major reform. [...] And Mr. Obama's programs increase the fraction of people getting more money back from the government than the taxes they pay almost to 50%, just as the demographics on an aging population will drive it up further. That's an unhealthy political dynamic.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: boskin; budgetdeficit; deficit; michaelboskin; nationaldebt; obamanomics

1 posted on 02/12/2010 11:00:12 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
When Deficits Become Dangerous

It passed that point a long time ago.

2 posted on 02/12/2010 11:06:15 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Pork Eating CRUSADER - FUBO! Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; Harrius Magnus; mojitojoe; Pelham; mom2twinsn2; LongLiveTheRepublic; ...
The Peter Schiff/Redistribution Watch Ping. (Washington Bankrupting our Nation by Spending your past, present and future money!)

We are screwed: Remarkably, President Obama will add more red ink in his first two years than President George W. Bush—berated by conservatives for his failure to control domestic spending and by liberals for the explosion of military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan—did in eight. In his first 15 months, Mr. Obama will raise the debt burden—the ratio of the national debt to GDP—by more than Reagan did in eight years.

3 posted on 02/12/2010 11:06:36 AM PST by sickoflibs (( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama is an idiot.


4 posted on 02/12/2010 11:07:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; FromLori

This thread is a good place to continue this discussion :)


5 posted on 02/12/2010 11:08:55 AM PST by sickoflibs (( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Remarkably, President Obama will add more red ink in his first two years than President George W. Bush—berated by conservatives for his failure to control domestic spending and by liberals for the explosion of military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan—did in eight. In his first 15 months, Mr. Obama will raise the debt burden—the ratio of the national debt to GDP—by more than Reagan did in eight years.

I'm soooo surprised........

***roll eyes***

6 posted on 02/12/2010 11:11:25 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
A conservative President, who made drastic cutbacks in spending to reduce the deficit, would have the support of his voting base.

Obama’s base is addicted to government largess. He can't reduce expenditures, without losing his base. He can't raise taxes, without losing the “moderates”.

7 posted on 02/12/2010 11:12:04 AM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Obama is an idiot.

Or he's a plant for his brilliant yet evil puppetmasters. I haven't decided yet.

8 posted on 02/12/2010 11:12:04 AM PST by OB1kNOb (I'd rather be over the hill than under it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

There’s no reason he can’t be both.


9 posted on 02/12/2010 11:13:32 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

hard to tell,
i vote for the later, but i too am an agnostic.


10 posted on 02/12/2010 11:16:05 AM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Lucky9teen
.


11 posted on 02/12/2010 11:22:11 AM PST by Touch Not the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

see where I come from, deficits are ALWAYS dangerous. But I’m oldfashioned that way.


12 posted on 02/12/2010 11:22:37 AM PST by mockingbyrd (Sarah speaks for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

There is no painless way out of this. And i just read where the Dims are going to try again to pass Health Care, again. This will be another Trillion Dollars that we do not have. The Chinese are worried and rightfully so. We do not have their money either. I guess we will just have to trade them States, for debt. How much for Hawaii ?


13 posted on 02/12/2010 11:36:01 AM PST by dbrew2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I think we've just found the motto for putting a stop to the insane borrowing binge!!

HOW MUCH FOR HAWAII?

14 posted on 02/12/2010 11:56:33 AM PST by DNME (Remember, we are still under a state of national emergency for H1N1! Remain vigilant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

True, dat.


15 posted on 02/12/2010 12:53:35 PM PST by OB1kNOb (I'd rather be over the hill than under it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Need more government handouts. Need new entertainment centers for crack whores squirting out babies, the ones they have now are sooooo 2007.


16 posted on 02/12/2010 4:05:57 PM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ...In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson