Posted on 02/13/2010 10:29:40 PM PST by smoothsailing
From the article:
“This theory might also iron out some chronology wrinkles. An August 4 birth would suggest an early November conception. Obama biographer Christopher Andersen, however, reports that Ann told the Dunhams of her pregnancy in “late October.” Presuming a missed period as first alarm, this would put conception in early September — before Ann would have met Barack Sr. This earlier conception date better explains both why Ann did not enroll for a second semester and how she was able to leave by mid-August for Seattle. If all this is true, however, it presumes active date-manipulation by Team Obama — a big “if.”
MissTickly weren’t you getting conflicting information regarding Obama’s birth date from Hawaii through your UPIA requests?
This "summary" answers my questions. My biggest question is why hide the records, this might explain it. But why hide all the other records? (The Patriot's Flag - Eligibility & Credibility). The bottom line for me..."why has the press been allowed to continually ignore all of this?" I don't think Obama is our problem, he is what he is, the press is the villain in this story for "projecting" something else upon the "blank screen."
To extend the Jack Cashill (Great Man!) football analogy, all this endless speculation about the Amazing Birth is just Delay of Game. Pinning hopes on the Kenyan Amazing Birth, Vancouver Birth, etc. ad nauseam, is just as fruitless and only plays into Team Obama's hands.
If what Barack Obama Jr. says about who his father was is true, he is ineligible to serve as POTUS, or even to have run! And that is no matter where he was born. If an American was indeed the father, BHO, Jr. is a fraud, but a Natural Born American Citizen Fraud. Either way, the likelihood of Impeachment and Conviction is nil. Ineligible or not, this Assklown is your de facto President until 2012. Barring a miracle, of course.
Release of the Birth Certificate, which is mandatory under Hawaiian Law and will happen, is just as apt to back up Obama's Story as it is ours. IMHO, all the legal actions must continue because this sort of doubt must never stain the Presidency again.
Nothing but idle and ridiculous speculation. Barack Obama II’s legal/historical/documentable father was the Kenyan, and nothing can or ever will change that. There are too many documents and facts in the public domain to think otherwise —
The first time I saw this photo, it said it was taken at Obama, Sr.’s arrival to Hawaii by boat. I don’t recall where I saw it.
Man he sure looks like POP,
but around his mouth he sure looks like Davis,
Its either grandpa is really Obama’s father, or
Obama is the son of Davis.
it is the puffiness around the lower lip.
http://www.thefinishingtouchgroup.com/images/davis_frank_marshall.jpg
http://neveryetmelted.com/wp-images/ObamaHandUp.jpg
why the heck did this creep have to come into our lives, I remember crying like a baby when he won the election.
As no one seems know the source of the image and as the captions keep changing to suit the story, it's impossible to say - arrival or departure. However, IMO what is not in doubt is that the image indicates the journey was made by SHIP...
Look closer. Who is the young woman standing close to O Senior? And why do the lei look so unnatural? Could it be the image has been tampered with? Are the 'lei' an addition to hide that he has his arm around her, and she, hers around him?
Whoever she is, she’s certainly standing very close to 0bama Sr. And she isn’t SADO.
Picture a teen mom recently delivered of a baby making the trip from Hawaii to Seattle, found a place to live and someone to help with the baby...and the baby so very small. Just does not make any sense.
"Dreams of my Father"--would then be a farce, if Stanley Durham is his true father and some hooker his mother. This would explain the tenacious refusal to release his records--his name, his connection to Africa, all phony.
You got that right!
And we didn’t see it because the myth of ‘Dreams’ has been repeated and repeated until it penetrated the subconscious.
mark ndesandjo is a spitting image of barry-
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
When was your last eye exam?
Goebbels. Big lie - they’ll believe it. And IIRC Stalin said just keep repeating the lie, no matter what, and sooner or later they’ll believe it.
New mothers - especially very young ones - would not choose to be thousands of miles away from any relatives or supportive people, and to start college immediately? Especially then?
It never made sense to me either. But so much doesn’t. She was supposedly seen there at that time and IIRC there records of some sort from that time, putting her in college there.
How about more evidence of a baby there with her...?
Where’s that photo from? I don’t think I’ve seen it before.
Fred, have you seen that one before? Quite the underslung jaw.
I saved that image from somewhere on November 12, 2008. I think it first appeared on the Long Thread. Funny thing...when I first pointed out that Stanley Armour Dunham was part of the group, several Freepers replied that was impossible!
I remember that. I saw Stanley immediately! I wonder where the image appeared from originally, it must have been from one of the Honolulu newspapers. Now I want to know it was arrival or departure.
Very good NEW article by Cashill.
Obama is creepy.
It's like having an alien in the WH.
IMO it was at arrival. There's not much to go on, other than Stanley Armour Dunham's age:
Arrival was supposedly June, 1959. (Three months before the FIRST AIRLIFT OF KENYAN STUDENTS)
The on the beach image would be around 1963? Does Stanley Armour Dunham appear to have aged some 4-5 years?
Add to this, it was 1964! Teen mother, mixed race tiny infant, moves across an ocean, two weeks after birth, starts college...In those days, mothers stayed in the hospital for several days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
