Skip to comments.Dr. Taitz demands a hearing within 20 days
Posted on 02/15/2010 6:58:57 AM PST by Vincent Jappi
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE Plaintiff,
HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH PRESIDING v.
Barack Hussein Obama, Defendant.
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
Notice of Application For Preliminary Injunction pursuant to LCvR 65.1 (c), LCvR 65.1 (d)
Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to recuse the US attorneys office from representing the defendant.
Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary injunction-Injunctive relief to obtain the vital records of the defendant prior to the February 26 deadline for document and response submission of the response by the Plaintiff to the CA Bar.
Plaintiff is seeking a preliminary injunction hearing within 20 days, as prescribed by LCvR 65.1 (d) to be scheduled by the court prior to March 1st.
Memorandum of point and authorities
The only relevant authority in this case, is the unanimous decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States and provided by the opinion written by two justices: John Paul Stevens and opinion by Steven Breyer.
Sitting president of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him from acts done before office and not related to the office.
Clinton v Jones, 520 US 681 (1997).
Decision was made based on Article 2 of the Constitution of the United States.
Background of the Case and Factual Allegations
(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...
They say persistence pays off....
I think he's justified in being a little miffed.
Just keep mashing the DONATE button!
She appears to have made a pretty clever move by using the charges against her, as proof of standing.
Not sure her request for a BC has much to do with her being sanctioned by the Judge in GA. My guess is she’ll be denied.
Got to agree, that was a masterstroke.
In a sane world there would already be a film version of all this, perhaps starring Milla Jovovich.
all this for an id check. hell, if you want a job in the US, you must fill out a W-9 form. this requires that you provide full citizenship information.
i guess its become fairly obvious... checking IDs is only for little people and not the elites.
18. Additionally I see a group of convicted criminals, convicted document forgers, who appear to be working in concert, submitting perjured affidavits, forging my signature in order to derail my cases and endanger my license.Is this the way Taitz squirms out of the affadavit she submitted claiming that Judge Land met with Attorney General Holder in a coffee shop across the street from Land's courthouse?
“...all this for an id check.”
Obama couldn’t get a clearance for a job sweeping The White House floors as a regular citizen if he didn’t have proof of citizenship.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
“Just keep mashing the DONATE button!” ~ 1rudeboy
Isn’t THAT the truth. Looks to me as if she’s just an opportunist trying to get a piece of Berg’s action:
Big time DemocRAT Hillary Clinton supporter, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, was the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obamas lack of qualifications to serve as President of the United States
Berg said, .... he has not proven that he is Constitutionally eligible to be President and ... Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his adopted name of Barry Soetoro from Indonesia. I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in our U.S.A., for our forefathers and for the 3.2 million men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution with our Peaceful Revolution to prove that Obama is not Constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President. I still have cases pending in the Federal Courts. Go to obamacrimes.com to see the status of each case. http://obamacrimes.com/
...since a DemocRAT was the first “Birther”, I’m quite content to allow the ‘RATS to own the issue.
23 posted on Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:28:12 PM by Matchett-PI http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2304853/posts?page=23#23
July 29, 2009
Suborned in the U.S.A.
The birth-certificate controversy is about Obamas honesty, not where he was born.
By Andrew C. McCarthy
July 30, 2009
Obamas birth certificate and the real issues
I doff my cap and bow low to Andrew McCarthy of National Review Online, who has produced essential reading for anyone wondering what to think about the birther controversy rocking the right, and now breaking into the mainstream media, which sees an opportunity to mock and discredit the right.
He and I agree: the entire Kenyan birth theory is a distraction, and a useful tool in the hands of Alinskyites on the ridicule and destroy mission. But before moving on to other significant issues, McCarthy acknowledges that NROs editorial yesterday accidentally mischaracterized the nature of the documentation that is available from Hawaii. He writes:
The information in the certification may be identical as far as it goes to whats in the complete state records, but there are evidently many more details in the state records than are set forth in the certification. Contrary to the editors description, those who want to see the full state record - the certificate or the so-called vault copy - are not on a wild-goose chase for a secondary document cloaked in darkness. That confuses their motives (which vary) with what theyve actually requested (which is entirely reasonable). Regardless of why people may want to see the vault copy, whats been requested is a primary document that is materially more detailed than what Obama has thus far provided.
McCarthy then lays out the real issue: Obamas extraordinary secrecy, amounting to a scrubbing of his paper trail, combined with his demonstrated record of lying about his past. Obama is a phony, though and through. A former assistant US Attorney, McCarthy economically but methodically assembles the evidence, including sources, that Obama has presented a false story of his life. He lists a startling number of lies about his life story, with documentation. [snip] Continue at above link.
I think she means Lucas Smith, Larry Sinclair and Charles Edward Lincoln, III people she brought to the party.
To continue my refrain to, “Let the ‘RATS own this issue”:
Lets not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first Birther
The PostEmail ^ | Jan. 11, 2010 | John Charlton
“He couldn’t get a job sweeping floors”. Love it...every job was a “created” job for this usurper, until he was handed the Presidency. Hooray for Orly Taitz. I’m for anyone who furthers this just cause, or for increasing publicity about this just cause. Focus everybody...the bad guy is Obummer. Anyone getting super supercilious about Orly or any of the “birthers” is not on the right side of this argument. OT, but couldn’t help but think if/when Obama gets his walking papers, can we then say to China the loan was illegal so we’re not paying it back. One can dream.
“Im for anyone who furthers this just cause, or for increasing publicity about this just cause. Focus everybody...the bad guy is Obummer.”
Yes, but let’s put the focus on him with the mantra:
“Obama is a British Subject. Obama is a British Subject.” I say again, “Obama is...” Let the nay-sayers defend that!
I know that the “Long Form Birth Certificate” is the linch-pin to his fraudulent ascendecy and his deception but I think it’s not gotten the traction it needs. Perhaps we’ll get more attention by the “British Subject” thingy?
I like this approach.
“Your honor. I insulted the court. I accused a judge of treason. I slept my my disbarred attorney/law clerk and he started filing things in my name. I can’t file things on time.
Due to all my screw-ups, my law license is now at risk.
Because all the cases I screwed up involve the president, his eligibility is therefore putting my law license at risk.
Therefore, I have standing.”
This is like shooting yourself in the foot and then suing the government for not having stricter gun laws.
It’s a novel approach.
If the new definition of novel is “batpoop crazy.”
Sorry folks, I am not on the Orly team. She means well, Im sure, but is a bit of a flake and a terribly inexperienced lawyer whose legal motions are almost laughable.
Actually her term is "bat-sh!t crazy" -- a term she used (spelled correctly) to describe the birthers in one of her
motions rants to Judge Land's court.
If she wishes to lay that sort of an allegation, then it is incumbent upon her to identify specifically which affadavits were submitted under a forged signature. In fact, as an officer of the court she is obligated to do so.
“She appears to have made a pretty clever move by using the charges against her, as proof of standing.”
sorry, but that’s not true. The fine is for her contemptuous conduct to the court and has nothing to do with the underlying case she brought. No court is even going to consider that argument.
Yup, it makes me wonder if this Judge expected the outcome.
“Yup, it makes me wonder if this Judge expected the outcome.”
Uh, no, he hasn't. And no, he didn't.
Who is Obama's birth doctor? Is that such a hard question for the President of the United States to answer?
1. Right now, I would just be satisfied with Obama coming out and announcing to all the world the name of his 1961 birth doctor so that the good doctor and his family can rightfully enjoy all the public glory and public rewards that a doctor who delivered a president of the united States should receive.
2. But surprisingly, dear old Obama has been conspicuously silent when it comes to publicly giving us his 1961 birth doctor's name.
3. Why is dear old Obama denying his 1961 birth doctor and his family all the public praise and rewards that a doctor who delivered the sitting President of the United States should be entitled to?
4. For instance, the doctor and his family could appear all over the television on such shows as Larry King, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck.
5. The good doctor could write a best-selling book about his experiences as a doctor at Kapiolani Hospital, the hospital where Obama says that he was born.
6. The good doctor could have a TV-movie made of his life, and he and his family could become rich and famous from books and movies.
7. The good doctor's family could have members who are important or not so important people today, people who could use the financial rewards and publicity that would come to them when Obama publicly announced the name of his 1961 Hawaii birth doctor.
8. But poor Obama, he is so silent about the name of his birth doctor.
9. So, again, why is the President of the United States behaving in such a terrible way and setting such a poor example to the people of the United States?
10. Could this be the reason: There is NO doctor name or hospital name on Obama's 1961 long form birth certificate?
11. Yes, that is the reason, in my opinion.
So, Taitz’ own incompetence created standing?
Do you really believe that this is how standing works?
Yes sir! And I'll add...
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children.http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born).
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!
Furthermore: Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate. That is how a foreign born baby could get a HI BC on record, which in turn generates the "birth announcements" in the newspapers.
Wanna bet? I predict this will get no further than any of Orly's other legal antics have gotten.
Not clever at all. Obama's birth certificate or lack thereof is completely irrelevant to the matter which she has been fined for. Unless her defense is that if not for the Birther cause she would not have been out there filing frivilous law suits and inflammatory motions? AKA:"I'm a complete idiot, Judge, and Obama made me do it" defense.
Here is the real opportunity for the “AFTER-BIRTHERS” and anti-Orly to get their “Desires” (playing on words) satisfied...hmmmm, hmmmm... !!!
The Tea Party protests may be like that!!
However, it seems that seasoned lawyers are either to cowardly or too complicit to touch what has become a "RACE" case!!!
It's hard to figure out if you are reading these different posts here on F.R. or are we in the twilight zone of D.U.???
Some people get a tingle up there leg on this subject.
Slithered out of your hole, did you?
I was just following Orly. And you, apparently, were just slithering along after me.
What no words of worship for your boy 0bamao?
Anyone and everyone has standing against the Communist usurper, as even a Kurdish or Zimbabwean peasant may die as a consequence of his usurpation.
Citizen of the world, eh?
A judge who refuses to examine the Usurper’s eligibility is indeed a traitor and deserves to be called such.
And yes, if he tries to retaliate against the truth-tellers he may thwart his own ploy to commit treason, as that would give standing to his purported victims.
To the extent that you are not yet in a banana republic, that is.
Which is very much in question given what the Usurper has gotten away with.
Those who have no arguments resort to name-calling.
But those are more generally found on the left.
To tell the truth in a Court of justice is what you are supposed to do in a Court of justice.
I mean, of course, a REAL Court of justice.
One without a kangaroo.