Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Taitz demands a hearing within 20 days
Orly Taitz Esq. ^ | Orly Taitz

Posted on 02/15/2010 6:58:57 AM PST by Vincent Jappi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Action: 10-151 RCL

Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE Plaintiff,

HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH PRESIDING v.

Barack Hussein Obama, Defendant.

APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

Notice of Application For Preliminary Injunction pursuant to LCvR 65.1 (c), LCvR 65.1 (d)

Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to recuse the US attorney’s office from representing the defendant.

Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary injunction-Injunctive relief to obtain the vital records of the defendant prior to the February 26 deadline for document and response submission of the response by the Plaintiff to the CA Bar.

Plaintiff is seeking a preliminary injunction hearing within 20 days, as prescribed by LCvR 65.1 (d) to be scheduled by the court prior to March 1st.

Memorandum of point and authorities

The only relevant authority in this case, is the unanimous decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States and provided by the opinion written by two justices: John Paul Stevens and opinion by Steven Breyer.

“Sitting president of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him from acts done before office and not related to the office”.

Clinton v Jones, 520 US 681 (1997).

Decision was made based on Article 2 of the Constitution of the United States.

Background of the Case and Factual Allegations

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; fraud; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; quowarranto; taitz; usurper; whackamole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: agere_contra

Sorry folks, I am not on the Orly team. She means well, Im sure, but is a bit of a flake and a terribly inexperienced lawyer whose legal motions are almost laughable.


21 posted on 02/15/2010 8:46:32 AM PST by mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping...


22 posted on 02/15/2010 8:46:51 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrRobertPlant2009
If the new definition of novel is “batpoop crazy.”


23 posted on 02/15/2010 9:13:38 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MrRobertPlant2009
If the new definition of novel is “batpoop crazy.”

Actually her term is "bat-sh!t crazy" -- a term she used (spelled correctly) to describe the birthers in one of her motions rants to Judge Land's court.

24 posted on 02/15/2010 9:14:33 AM PST by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

If she wishes to lay that sort of an allegation, then it is incumbent upon her to identify specifically which affadavits were submitted under a forged signature. In fact, as an officer of the court she is obligated to do so.


25 posted on 02/15/2010 10:13:41 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

“She appears to have made a pretty clever move by using the charges against her, as proof of standing.”

sorry, but that’s not true. The fine is for her contemptuous conduct to the court and has nothing to do with the underlying case she brought. No court is even going to consider that argument.


26 posted on 02/15/2010 11:28:13 AM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Vincent Jappi

bump


28 posted on 02/15/2010 2:11:05 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void

ping


29 posted on 02/15/2010 2:13:44 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Vincent Jappi

obumpa


30 posted on 02/15/2010 6:21:26 PM PST by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vincent Jappi
By persecuting Dr Taitz for trying to uphold the rule of law, a rogue judge seems to have given her standing to challenge the Gray Communist's eligibility.

Yup, it makes me wonder if this Judge expected the outcome.

31 posted on 02/15/2010 7:10:37 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
“By persecuting Dr Taitz for trying to uphold the rule of law, a rogue judge seems to have given her standing to challenge the Gray Communist's eligibility.”

“Yup, it makes me wonder if this Judge expected the outcome.”

Uh, no, he hasn't. And no, he didn't.

32 posted on 02/15/2010 7:27:33 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dryman
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

******

Who is Obama's birth doctor? Is that such a hard question for the President of the United States to answer?

1. Right now, I would just be satisfied with Obama coming out and announcing to all the world the name of his 1961 birth doctor so that the good doctor and his family can rightfully enjoy all the public glory and public rewards that a doctor who delivered a president of the united States should receive.

2. But surprisingly, dear old Obama has been conspicuously silent when it comes to publicly giving us his 1961 birth doctor's name.

3. Why is dear old Obama denying his 1961 birth doctor and his family all the public praise and rewards that a doctor who delivered the sitting President of the United States should be entitled to?

4. For instance, the doctor and his family could appear all over the television on such shows as Larry King, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck.

5. The good doctor could write a best-selling book about his experiences as a doctor at Kapiolani Hospital, the hospital where Obama says that he was born.

6. The good doctor could have a TV-movie made of his life, and he and his family could become rich and famous from books and movies.

7. The good doctor's family could have members who are important or not so important people today, people who could use the financial rewards and publicity that would come to them when Obama publicly announced the name of his 1961 Hawaii birth doctor.

8. But poor Obama, he is so silent about the name of his birth doctor.

9. So, again, why is the President of the United States behaving in such a terrible way and setting such a poor example to the people of the United States?

10. Could this be the reason: There is NO doctor name or hospital name on Obama's 1961 long form birth certificate?

11. Yes, that is the reason, in my opinion.

33 posted on 02/15/2010 11:14:24 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So, Taitz’ own incompetence created standing?

Do you really believe that this is how standing works?


34 posted on 02/16/2010 6:04:54 AM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; hennie pennie; Beckwith; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Dr. Taitz demands a hearing within 20 days
Orly Taitz Esq. ^ | Orly Taitz

[Thanks, Seizethecarp.]

35 posted on 02/16/2010 8:15:48 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dryman; Vincent Jappi
"“FREE THE LONG FORM!”"

Yes sir! And I'll add...

 

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

 

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

 

It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born).
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!


http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com

 

Furthermore:  Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate. That is how a foreign born baby could get a HI BC on record, which in turn generates the "birth announcements" in the newspapers.

36 posted on 02/16/2010 10:14:10 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vincent Jappi
By persecuting Dr Taitz for trying to uphold the rule of law, a rogue judge seems to have given her standing to challenge the Gray Communist's eligibility.

Wanna bet? I predict this will get no further than any of Orly's other legal antics have gotten.

37 posted on 02/16/2010 10:16:56 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
She appears to have made a pretty clever move by using the charges against her, as proof of standing.

Not clever at all. Obama's birth certificate or lack thereof is completely irrelevant to the matter which she has been fined for. Unless her defense is that if not for the Birther cause she would not have been out there filing frivilous law suits and inflammatory motions? AKA:"I'm a complete idiot, Judge, and Obama made me do it" defense.

38 posted on 02/16/2010 10:20:47 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vincent Jappi

Here is the real opportunity for the “AFTER-BIRTHERS” and anti-Orly to get their “Desires” (playing on words) satisfied...hmmmm, hmmmm... !!!


39 posted on 02/16/2010 1:45:18 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mono
Some times it takes inexperience people to get things rolling!

The Tea Party protests may be like that!!

However, it seems that seasoned lawyers are either to cowardly or too complicit to touch what has become a "RACE" case!!!

40 posted on 02/16/2010 6:49:01 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson