Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2010 4:22:28 PM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill

i’m not surprised. grrr.


2 posted on 02/15/2010 4:25:37 PM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
God bless our troops. I pray that the citizens rat out the bastards!
4 posted on 02/15/2010 4:28:51 PM PST by goodtomato (I'm really, really blessed! I support Marco Rubio 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

They must all want to be buried in an Obama T-shirt.


6 posted on 02/15/2010 4:34:06 PM PST by RepublicanMeansAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
It’s difficult to say who is responsible: the Obama Administration, General McChrystal or both.
8 posted on 02/15/2010 4:36:42 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

“NATO and Afghan military officials say killing militants is not the goal . . . More important is to win public support.”

__________________________________________________________

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe this was the strategy we used to gain unconditional surrender from Germany and Japan. /sarcasm


10 posted on 02/15/2010 4:43:34 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
"They're using our rules of engagement against us." - Lance Cpl. Travis Anderson... adding that his platoon had repeatedly seen men drop their guns into ditches and walk away to blend in with civilians.

That's a marked change from the battle of Fallujah, Iraq in November 2004. When Marines there encountered snipers holed up in a building, they routinely called in airstrikes. In Marjah, fighter jets are flying at low altitude in a show of force, but are not firing missiles.

We endured this kind of BS in Beirut, where many men died without a chance and for no reason at all. I had hoped we'd never see it again, but this restrictive ROE is a leadership betrayal of the lives entrusted to them.

11 posted on 02/15/2010 4:45:12 PM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

President Karzi has demanded strict rules of engagement to keep civilian casualties, “collateral damage”, to a bare minimum. We are there to free Afghannies who are our allies from militants. It is in our best interest to keep the civilians on our side. This only makes sense.


12 posted on 02/15/2010 4:46:07 PM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

16 posted on 02/15/2010 5:01:54 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Where these ROE’s also in place during Bush’s terms in office?


23 posted on 02/15/2010 6:01:06 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Were these ROE’s also in place during Bush’s terms in office?


24 posted on 02/15/2010 6:01:26 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson