To: HiTech RedNeck
Most science is biased toward multi-cellular organisms, but the vast majority of life on Earth is microscopic. You're really just a transportation system for bacteria and the like. Even PETA rarely gives a second thought to killing billions of organisms with a single dab of soap.
those tanks are going to need copious amounts of water. Would we be willing to sacrifice, say, Lake Michigan in order to get all the gasoline the USA needs?
My swimming pool will bloom an unbelievable amount of algae in short order if left unattended. One of the biggest problems municipal water plants have is algae. That's why phosphates are banned in detergent - not because they harm life, but because it's basically algae fertilizer.
Algae is not difficult to grow, and once you harvest it, you can re-use the water over and over and over again. Near as I can tell, it would take about 220,000 square miles of algae farms at the rate of 2,000 gallons / acre to replace all of the oil in the USA. But that's to replace every single drop of fossil fuel, and it's possible that the numbers would improve with more advanced technology.
posted on 02/16/2010 8:22:16 PM PST
by Question Liberal Authority
("My...health care plan is a Bolshevik plot... which will destroy America." - Barack Obama)
To: Question Liberal Authority
The yield you cite is for common pond scum algae. What is being researched is a bioengineered algae operating in an enclosed system. The yield per acre/year is at least an order of magnitude higher. It will blow away corn based ethanol.
posted on 02/16/2010 8:57:32 PM PST
by Fred Hayek
(From this point forward the Democratic Party will be referred to as the Communist Party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson