Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steelyourfaith

Well, I did a search on the Times-Dispatch headline and came up empty. I think the post is still relevant because of the way the reporter mischaracterized the EPA finding. Who would contend that global warming is not “bad”? Who would contend that breathing is “bad”?

The EPA said breathing is bad, not that global warming is bad.


3 posted on 02/17/2010 4:40:41 AM PST by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Jack Aubrey
"Well, I did a search on the Times-Dispatch headline and came up empty."

Are you referring to your link? If so, it works for me. ... or are you referring to whether Virginia is going after the EPA, which is confirmed by other sources ... or something else? I'm confused.

"I think the post is still relevant because of the way the reporter mischaracterized the EPA finding. The EPA said breathing is bad, not that global warming is bad."

Sadly, sloppy reporting and editing by the media is becoming the norm.

"Who would contend that global warming is not 'bad'? Who would contend that breathing is 'bad'?"

Actually, many claim that the globe would benefit from a bit more global warming than we have presently have ... and it is an inescapable fact that the ecotard left holds human life secondary to the environment.

5 posted on 02/17/2010 5:04:53 AM PST by steelyourfaith (FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson