Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DesertRhino
Again,,, it’s an interesting and humorous concept that the Supreme court says it’s illegal to seceed. Imagine the USA truly elected a marxist and became a socialist dictatorship. And that a state decided that the time to end their association had come, but that this SAME state still thought they must abide by supreme court rulings. Odd.

One would have to assume that a socialist dictatorship would have done away with the Supreme Court when it did away with the rest of the Constitution, so your point is somewhat moot.

21 posted on 02/17/2010 9:27:55 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

“One would have to assume that a socialist dictatorship would have done away with the Supreme Court when it did away with the rest of the Constitution, so your point is somewhat moot.”

Not really,, ever hear of the Supreme Court of the Soviet Union? A Socialist takeover here would almost certainly leave familiar things like the Supreme court intact as window dressing. FDR demonstrated this with his court packing scheme. They will leave it intact,,, as long as it falls into line. Socialist dictatorships are FAMOUS for having the form of the law. It makes them feel legitimate.
A US Supreme court controlled by the plotters,, Obama types,, would have a Hillary, an Ayers, A Maxine Waters, etc,, happily ruling in the favor of the Socialists. Don’t think Red Dawn,,think Obama and Nancy.

So it seems that your point is somewhat, shall we say, ,,,moot?


37 posted on 02/17/2010 9:39:16 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson