Skip to comments.BERG v OBAMA (FCA CASE APPEAL) - APPELLANT BRIEF [1230292
Posted on 02/17/2010 4:30:28 PM PST by Elderberry
This is a Qui Tam (False Claims) Action wherein the U.S. District Court had original jurisdiction pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 through 3733. This is an appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, entered on June 9, 2009 and September 21, 2009.
Notice of Appeal was timely filed on October 21, 2009. Accordingly, this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1291.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The government filed a Motion to Dismiss Appellants Qui Tam (False Claims) action against Barack Hussein Obama for his term as United States Senator for the State of Illinois, who now happens to be the President of the United States. The Court held a Hearing under Seal. The government claimed they had an unfettered discretion to dismiss the case and the Court did not have any say in the matter. The Court complied with the Government and Dismissed the Relators Action against Barack Hussein Obama on June 9, 2009.
Appellant filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Dismissal on the basis of the law discovered regarding the Governments Conflict-of-Interest as Barack Hussein Obama was the sitting President and their boss. Appellant was not afforded a hearing or chance to be heard, although he requested such, and Appellants Motion was Denied on September 21, 2009.
This timely appeal was filed on October 21, 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Trouble in Utopia.
On those grounds? Not surprising at all.
Why is this case under seal? Berg had a case under seal but I am not sure if this is the same case. What was being kept from the public view?
Why is the public being denied the truth about Obama?
That’s what we all want to know!
Say — Philip Berg is ACTIVE, again, come on over & take a looksee.
I like how they have the verdict in the motion! makes it all easier
How can they determine if it is a FALSE CLAIM unless they see the evidence HE IS ASKING FOR!!
BHO doesn't stand a chance of reelection. 2012 is NOT that far away.
We have a nation, we have a military and we have the grassroots teaparty.
Next time you feel depressed or frantic over the state of affairs, find a LEFT WING TALK SHOW on the radio --- they are simply beside themselves in angst, vowing to never vote Democrat EVERY again.
LOL -- there is HOPE, and not the Obama variety, LOL
Not to worry brother... sometimes I feel a need to force some to pay attention. It is obviously not needed in your case... as you are on the case!
>>Why is the public being denied the truth about Obama?<<
Can you just imagine the political fallout if that were to happen?
Heads will roll, political applecarts will be upended, crow eating contests in DC and large scale investigations that may last for years to come. Too many politicians think that it is too steep a price to pay especially when their arse may end up on the chopping block.
There are 1067 days left in the Obama Administration.
I am holding my breath.
“Appellant filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Dismissal on the basis of the law discovered regarding the Governments Conflict-of-Interest as Barack Hussein Obama was the sitting President and their boss.”
Why can’t any of these people write like attorneys?
To be dismissive of this guy.
Philip Berg is an FOH.
And he started his hunt for the missing long form birth certificate long long long ago, even before Andy Martin of Chicago conducted his own investigation.
Philip Berg was the Number 1 Founding Member of the Hillary-4-PREZ Fanclub.
It will be interesting to see IF our Secretary of State suddenly takes a more active role in more interesting foreign affairs, LOL
“WHY is this case under seal?” is a good question; is there any way to learn why the court made this decision?
STOP holding your breath, it'll be over before you know it, and this entire administration will become a tiny footnote in the Annals of History. NOT to worry!!
I’m wrong that this is badly written? How?
Doesn't matter if it's garbled, not at all.