Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill
Ok. So we can't burn coal. Bad..... Can't burn oil. Bad..... Can't have wind farms because they might kill migrating birds. Bad..... Can't have nuclear energy. Bad...... Can't have liquified natural gas delivered into this country via ships. Bad..... Can't have dams because it interfers with fish spawning up rivers. Bad.......

Does this no-nukes "progressive" have any, and I'm not talking pie-in-the-sky technology decades to centuries from being able to be put into mass use, but any real alternatives to the worlds energy needs?

3 posted on 02/17/2010 7:38:59 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Proud_USA_Republican
I would say the Flux Capacitor but it takes Plutonium to produce the 1.21 Gigawatts for a DeLorean.
5 posted on 02/17/2010 7:45:52 PM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
their alternative:

6 posted on 02/17/2010 7:45:56 PM PST by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
Its all about power and control. Soon energy will have to be rationed. Since this administration is so incompetent, I see no reason for success on the government's side.
12 posted on 02/17/2010 8:17:26 PM PST by oyez ( damnant quod non intelligunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson