Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Raptor Killer is a "Game Changer"
The Weekly Standard ^ | 2/17/2010 | Michael Goldfarb

Posted on 02/18/2010 2:11:39 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: brooklin

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60S0UW20100129

Lieutenant Colonel Marcel de Haas, Russian security researcher at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, was not convinced of the plane’s bright future.

“My impression is that this new fighter plane is also more propaganda than a real expectancy,” he told Reuters by e-mail.


21 posted on 02/18/2010 2:49:31 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

>>>> Lieutenant Colonel Marcel de Haas, Russian security researcher at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, was not convinced of the plane’s bright future.

“My impression is that this new fighter plane is also more propaganda than a real expectancy,” he told Reuters by e-mail.

That would be nice...


22 posted on 02/18/2010 3:26:34 PM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
I thought the Foxbat used vacuum tubes to improve avionics endurance, and boost its radar output.

It did. And it was an impressive adaptation of old tech to new uses, but it also had the virtue of necessity. The old CCCP simply didn't have the tech base to make the modern avionics used in virtually every western aircraft, in sufficient reliable quantities to equip even their most sophisticated front-line aircraft. Nor could they buy or steal sufficient quantities. Western built aircraft got the same level of performance (or better) using modern avionics. Think about it. If vacuum tubes had been the way to go, we would have been using them as well.

And this is where the comparison between the MiG-25 and the PAK-FA break down.

It is far much easier for the Russians to buy the tech needed on the open market than it used to be, so I do not expect the PAK-FA to be the paper tiger the Foxbat was. But, and as Lando says, this is a big but, when moving from prototype to production aircraft, the devil is in the details.

This is going to be massively expensive. Factories are going to have to be built, raw materials are going to have to be secured, etc., etc., etc. Just gathering the trained workers necessary is at least a two or three year evolution because many will have to be educated from scratch.

It's a bluff. A typical Russian growl, make faces, thump chest, bluff.

23 posted on 02/18/2010 6:34:27 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Cool, thanks for the detailed reply!


24 posted on 02/19/2010 2:35:44 AM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson