Skip to comments.
The Pill and Breast Cancer
American Thinker.com ^
| February 21, 2010
| Tim Collins, MD
Posted on 02/21/2010 1:07:04 AM PST by neverdem
Bad news for women who have been using birth control pills, although you won't learn about it from the mainstream media. An International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Working Group has concluded that combined estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives and combined estrogen-progestogen menopausal therapy are carcinogenic to humans, after a thorough review of the published scientific evidence.[i]
IARC is an arm of the World Health Organization with, as they say, "global reach." Involved in everything from basic research to publication of classification systems for various cancer types, the IARC classifications are the standard of care in the US and elsewhere. IARC statements are accorded great authority. One can imagine that if, in the epigraph, the words "oral contraceptives" were replaced with, say, "peanut butter" or "Republican Party membership," the political posturing and shouting in the media would never stop.
But we're talking birth control pills, so the silence is deafening.
Lists of risks associated with BCP's can be found in any medical textbook: heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and pulmonary emboli. Less lethal but still obnoxious side effects include depression, headaches, and nausea. Liver cancer is associated with BCP use. Liver cancer is not terribly common, but neither is it rare; the National Cancer Institute estimates that it killed about 5500 women
[ii] For comparison, cervical cancer, whose risk is also increased by BCP use
, will have claimed the lives of an estimated 3600 women in the same year. But it is breast cancer
that concerns us here. Breast cancer is the second most common form of malignancy diagnosed in U.S. women (after skin cancer), with NCI estimates of 178,000 new diagnoses and 40,000 deaths
. If the amount of money poured into screening programs is any indication, breast cancer is by far the most feared, and politically volatile, of any malignancy.
Papers have been being published for decades suggesting an increased risk of breast cancer in birth control pill users. In 1996, a meta-analysis of the 54 studies in the literature, dating back to 1959, was published in Lancet
. There were three principal findings: first, that current or recent users of BCPs had a "slightly increased risk of future breast cancer, second, the cancers tended to be lower stage (hadn't spread when diagnosed), and, finally, that ten years after cessation of use, risk dropped to baseline.
[iii] The National Cancer Institute cites this study on its website
, as well as two others. The second study is the 2002 "Woman's CARE' study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine
, in which the authors concluded that BCPs conferred no increased risk, period.
[iv] Finally, the NCI cites its own 2003 study, concluding that BCP use does
increase risk, and the risk is highest in young women who have used the Pill within 5 years of the cancer diagnosis.
[v] The reason for this last findings appears to be that breasts of young women, especially adolescents, are anatomically and physiologically more vulnerable to carcinogens like BCP's because they have not gone through a nine month pregnancy
. Interestingly, the NCI website does not mention the 2005 IARC/WHO statement cited at the header of this paper.
In January, 2006, the New England Journal of Medicine
published a review article entitled, "Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer."
[vi] The authors conclude, "Studies of breast cancer have consistently found an increased risk associated with ... the use of oral contraceptives
[vii] Then, in October, 2006 Mayo Clinic Proceedings
(pdf) published an article that concludes, "Use of (oral contraceptives) is associated with an increased risk of premenopausal breast cancer, especially with use before first full term pregnancy." However, an editorial
in the same issue concluded, "all risks and benefits of OC use must be considered, not just the risk of breast cancer." In 2009, another study by the Fred Hutchinson Institute revealed that triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), one of the most lethal types, showed that women who start BCP's before age 18 multiply their risk of TNBC by 3.7 times and recent users multiply their risk by 4.2 times
[viii] Yet Louise Brinton, one of the co-authors of this and numerous other studies demonstrating increased rates of breast cancer in young women taking oral contraceptives, is a researcher at the NCI and chief organizer of a 2003 symposium on breast cancer and reproductive events in young women that failed to mention this connection
Which brings us to the crux of the issue. There is evidence that birth control pills, especially when used by young women, increase a woman's risk of breast cancer.
[ix] Given that we're talking about the most widely used class of drugs on the planet, and one of the commonest forms of malignancy in women, the implications are not trivial. But the spin of the medical establishment as well as cancer charities, including the National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, and Susan Komen Foundation, is to push these findings under the rug.
Is it because our entire culture is organized around contraception and its twisted sister, abortion? Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recognized the central position of contraception (and abortion) to our way of life fifteen years ago when she said, "...for two decades, people have organized intimate relationships...in reliance on the availability of abortion in the event that contraception should fail
Taking away BCPs would be like taking away air. And yet, I think there are people out there who would like to know of this information. To borrow phrasing from the homepage of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer
, not all women with breast cancer used birth control pills, and not all women who used birth control pills will develop breast cancer. But, BCP use appears to be a risk factor -- an avoidable
risk factor -- in the development of breast cancer, and I think that's worth knowing.
[ii] To be clear, it is a specific subtype - hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)- which is linked with BCP use. But, the vast majority of "liver and bile duct cancer" in the NCI data is HCC. Not all HCC is linked to BCP use, in fact most is not: twice as many men as women die of HCC. But BCP use does
increase HCC risk in women. Also, HCC is not to be confused with hepatic adenoma, a benign liver tumor associated with BCP use.
[iii] Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Lancet
[iv] Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG, et al. Oral Contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine
[v] Althuis MD, Brogan DD, Coates RJ, et al. Breast cancers among very young premenopausal women (United States). Cancer Causes and Control
[vi] Yager JD, Davidson, NE. Estrogen Carcinogenesis in Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine
[vii] ibid, "Conclusions". My emphasis.
[viii] Dolle J, Daling J, White E, Brinton L, Doody D, et al. Risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer in women under the age of 45 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
[ix] Similar data exist regarding abortion
as a risk factor for breast cancer, but that is beyond the scope of this little piece.
[x] U.S. Supreme Court Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. Casey
, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) Quote is from Sec. III A 2 para. 3 Entire case is available at FindLaw, FindLaw.com under "Cases and Codes", U.S. Supreme Court.
[xi] I would like to thank Dr. Mary Davenport for her suggestions and additional citations.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bcp; birthcontrol; birthcontrolpills; breastcancer; cancer; ocp; thepill
posted on 02/21/2010 1:07:05 AM PST
You can’t play around with Gods creations and not expect bad outcomes.
abortion, BC pill, and the abortion pill are dangerous to the female body.
After 50+ years of use the data is now proving the dangers.
posted on 02/21/2010 1:21:38 AM PST
I’d rather see the use of birth control in order to reduce the rate of abortion and teenage pregnancy.
However, we can wear pink.
posted on 02/21/2010 1:23:07 AM PST
(SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
This author raises some interesting points. The world came to a sudden stop when it was trumpeted that women on HRT risked an additional 4 breast cancers per 1000 women. These are postmenopausal women whose cancers tend to be less aggressive.
COnsider that the additional risk this author describes is in YOUNG women (in fact he points out that after stopping OCPs the risk diminishes to baseline in a few years). So the impact of these cancers on society is relatively speaking much greater. Yet these findings languish in the “intellectual doldrums”. He makes a very good point and doesn’t really stress what I am pointing out enough. IMHO.
posted on 02/21/2010 1:54:13 AM PST
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
Forcing the body to do things it was never intended to do in the first place has never been a good idea.
I knew in my twenties that BCPs were dangerous. That was in the 70s btw.
posted on 02/21/2010 5:58:06 AM PST
I’d rather see the use of birth control in order to reduce the rate of abortion and teenage pregnancy.
There are practical and safe alternatives, but they do not work with irresponsible people.
posted on 02/21/2010 6:17:13 AM PST
by Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
posted on 02/21/2010 6:18:18 AM PST
You do understand that most birth control pills are abortifacient, don’t you?
posted on 02/21/2010 7:03:00 AM PST
by A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
“has concluded that combined estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives “
When the Pill was first introduced, it had much higher levels of estrogen and progestogen than current pills. And many pills now contain progestogen only and no estrogen.
One side benefit of the pill is up to a 50% reduction in the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers.
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
posted on 02/21/2010 9:04:05 PM PST
(Xin loi minh oi)
Here is my reply to this: Without all the proper knowledge of the situation it is easy to say there is an increased risk of breast cancer with OCPS. There are many confounding issues, like:
1. The doses of estrogen in OCPs in the 60s were astronomical compared to today’s doses, yet studies still figure in populations who took these doses into the numbers.
2. MUCH Stronger risk factors for breast cancer include obesity and alcohol usage... both of which have increased exponentially since the 1960s among women. Neither of which are accounted for in the epidemiological numbers everyone cites for the increase in breast cancer in the last 50 years.
3. Most of the increased risk of blood clots with OCPs is due to concurrent tobacco usage. The combination of nicotine and tar metabolites +estrogen causes the liver to over-produce some blood clotting factors. Without nicotine and tar, this increased production does not occur in the presence of estrogen alone.
4. OCPs don’t actually cause liver CANCER. They can increase the risk of benign liver tumors (hepatiocellular adenoma). The increased risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (CANCER) is actually thought to be due to sexual transmission of the Hepatitis C Virus (which women who take OCPs are at higher risk because they don’t usually use condoms)...
5. The same idea stands for increased risk of cervical cancer (the HPV virus causes cervical cancer and women who take OCPS contract the virus more frequently)... Good thing there is a vaccine now for HPV (Vaccinate your kids.)
6. I know many good docs who recommend patients take OCPs just to prevent ovarian cancer, for which they are very effective (reduce risk by 40%). In patients with a genetic predisposition to ovarian cancer or a strong family history, it is universally recommended. Ovarian cancer usually has no symptoms and there is no screening test. Thus it is usually caught in late stages where it has spread throughout the body. (average 5 year survival for ovarian cancer= 8%). I’d trade a theoretical increased risk of breast cancer for 40% decrease in ovarian cancer any day. Not even a hard choice.
7. One theory (which I happen to subscribe to) is that the increased risk among women taking OCPs has nothing to do with the medication. It has to do with a bias of what women in the population are getting regular gynecological and breast exams. Most docs require a yearly exam to refill a prescription for an OCP. Therefore, breast cancer is caught in these women compared to non-OCP users who are not having yearly exams (or maybe no routine healthcare at all).
Its a well-written article, but the bottom line is that it may not be a causal relationship after all. Thanks for the ping.
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson