Skip to comments.Conservatives can kiss off Hot Air blog
Posted on 02/22/2010 6:16:07 PM PST by GeronL
Wow. Just as soon as the "Hot Air" blog was purchased by the Christian conglomerate Salem Communications from conservative commentator Michelle Malkin, it has suddenly become an advocate for all things gay. What in the world is up with that?
For background, GOPROUD is an organization dedicated to advancing special rights for homosexual behavior, and advocates the overthrow of the Defense of Marriage Act and the overthrow of the law banning homosexual service in the military.
Not only was GOPROUD welcomed at CPAC, an event which is supposed to be the annual showcase for conservative values, the organization was allowed to sponsor the event, giving visibility and recognition to its effort to legitimize sexual deviancy.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
I’ll decide for myself.
Allah Pundit is shilling for Myth Romney and calling social issues unimportant.
Sad, I read HotAir everyday.
Well I did.
Not AllahPundit though...
Hot Air or Blowing Smoke?
I agree, and we MUST purge homosexual influenced on “conservative” policy and issues, if we do not then the Conservative movement is DOA, and the Tea Party Movement that seeks to replace if (if allowed to become so sexualized, and secular that traditional conservatives are not welcomed) will fall eventually along side with it, (Republicans have fallen the in grave before the other two), of course Christianity will survive and live on (even if in an underground form)!
Yeah..Allah has been a problem for some time. I detect some anti-Christian/ Andrew Sullivan type sentiment there. Especially when it comes to conservative women who mention their Christian faith. He’s ragged on Palin and Coulter. He’s not as overt as some, he uses what others say to attack them most times. Very catty guy.
Where in the heck did ‘AllahPundit’ get his moniker? I’ve never liked it for some strange reason. JMO.
And I’m getting tired of reading on FRepublic how I have to abhor homosexual human beings to be a ‘conservative.’ You religious people need to learn to understand that not everyone thinks Leviticus is the final word, and understand that while we all have problem with leftist politics and some aspects of the ‘gay agenda’ that not everyone thinks that accepting that these people are out there, have been out there and will always be out there is some kind of moral degeneration.
SOme of us even have known high quality individuals who were homosexual, much better people than those who rail against “queers” in thread after thread.
The moral drift is very evident
Allahpundit has been bashing Sarah Palin every chance he gets. That has been very noticeable.
No more HOTAIR for me and if this garbage continues, no more GOP either.
Indeed, even since I was a child in the 80’s and a teen in the 90’s, it gets so bad even (Christians) become numb..and sometimes corrupted by it!
So when they are instructing kindergartners in fisting and sex with strangers, you’ll be fine with it?
I wonder about some FReepers sometimes.
It’s a tsunami.
Sorry. I’m over there quite often during the day, and I’m not seeing anything close to what you’re talking about.
They push and push and we cede them ground each time. They want a foot and we give an inch. Well now they want everyone of us to fund abortion and they want to mandate sickening sex taught in elementary schools.
AND still we cede???
I like hotair, and will continue to frequent it. I’ve never really cared about the gay marriage issue one way or the other. There are WAY more important political priorities IMHO.
It wasn’t so long ago that people like this were locked up. But I guess we can’t do that anymore.
Considering that (despite much bruhaha to the contrary) no such law exists, it does make me question the veracity of the entire article.
I knew a stupid post like that would be quick to follow.
You are aware that not all gays propose such things, and the ones that do are generally leftists who we already oppose (I assume we oppose “afrocentric” history as the lie that it is, also—doesn’t mean we must embrace anti-black perspectives.)
That’s a false choice you present. One can support ANY person who acts within reason to assert their humanity and right to live free in society without supporting destructive or corrosive notions of what’s appropriate for children’s instruction.
But you knew that...
Mmm ... not me. So stop your proselyting. Thank you.
HOTAIR: Michelle Malkin was HOT. If she is gone, all that is left is the AIR.
Why worry about facts when you can focus on paranoia and hysteria about homosexuals wanting crazy things like ‘rights?’
Oh no, someone’s gone “soft on the gays!” We have to stiffen our resolve and meet this evil threat head on! Penetrating their defenses again and again.
I swear, the posts that often accompany gay issues that focus on the sexual practices of homosexuals I find interesting because they seem far too fascinated with the subject than people who don’t engage in it should.
Just look at the Olympics, men’s figure skating. My middle daughter, Iraqi vet, won’t even watch TV anymore, it’s gay TV all the time. I agree, we watch reruns of Andy Griffith, and that genre.
Part of the post is agreement with you. The rest is directed “out there,” I thought that would be clear from the post.
CPAC has defined conservativism as being merely anti-Obama. Almost all the speakers were trashing Obama and not mentioning social issues. Disappointing. The best speech was from Mike Pence. He had the courage to say NO to Planned Parenthood funding and NO to gay marriage at CPAC.
Geron, So when they're beating all the gays bloody in the back alley for being gay, you'll be fine with it?
See? That's how your idiotic, melodramatic, passive-aggressive, illogical hyperbole sounds.
Not all gay people are out to spread a radical agenda to children. Get. Over. Yourself.
Yes, that would be humane and morally justified. Lock up everyone who is homosexual.
So much for that Christ-like love...
As will I. And good for you.
The “you religious people” thing seemed directed at me. Forgive me if I misunderstood.
Thanks for the support.
If it’s not gay threads or threads about Haiti, I can stomach FR but there are a lot of hateful, vile people who claim to be conservatives and religious who don’t practice Christian love, don’t ACTUALLY believe in individual rights and frankly are fairly ignorant individuals who assert their malicious ignorance as if we on the right should be proud of such things.
I don’t see anyone trying to pass laws to legalize beating gays. So the comparison is off base.
No, what part of queer DON’T you understand?
Sorry, I tend to do that. Introduce a post with a direct acknowledgment of something said then move on to a generally-directed thought. My apologies for not dividing that more clearly! :)
They are already doing this in some places, so it is fair to criticize it. Tell me all of the gay groups ho have come out against this?
You sound like a liberal troll, projecting that you have to "abhor homosexual human beings" [in liberalspeak, "HATE"TM] to be a conservative.
What you RINO infiltrators need to learn is that conservatives object to homosexual behaviour ITSELF as a moral failing, and not as a proxy for across-the-board moral turpitude. But that still doesn't make the perversion OK! The homosexuality is morally wrong all on its own: it is ORTHOGONAL to other skills.
Martina Navratilova was a world-class tennis star, and her homosexuality didn't taint that. But looking at it from the other direction, the tennis skills do not redeem or excuse the sexual sin.
Has it ever occurred to you that your last paragraph is *itself* judgmental (and therefore, by your own lights, hypocritical)?
I loathe Johnny Weir despite his talent, but that has more to do with his politics than his sexuality.
I don’t hear any of them speaking out against educating our children about sex especially at very young ages.
Too late. Being gay is already legal. Get over it.
I don’t subscribe to the recent hysterical hot off the presses stories about what the evil gays have planned for children.
Instead of worrying about gays, fight for homeschooling, fight for vouchers or the total separation of State and Education, create freedom to hear and teach the messages you want.
I’m sure there are a lot of homosexuals who think it makes sense to teach kids about sex. The thing is, you can teach them about ‘sex’ in the most basic terms without getting into techniques. It would seem to me that there are many gays out there who DO NOT support teaching 1st graders about ‘fisting’ I mean come on. The majority of gays don’t even do that stuff.
There is an agenda to fight, but you presented a false choice—because I don’t hate gays doesn’t mean I must therefore support every leftist social engineering project or experiment in identity politics indoctrination. So, what sam_Paine made just as much sense as your first post to me. You don’t have to be FOR beating the pulp out of gays for being gay just because you oppose 1st graders learning about “fisting.”
You do realize all of that, right?
I was not proposing such a thing. I was talking about locking pedophiles away.
Watch this video.
Quite frankly, I’m tired of people such as yourself, making it a religious issue to DEFEND queers. If queers would STOP bringing up the issue, then it WOULDN’T be an issue.
I am sick of the corrupting nature the homosexual issue has been on society in general as it has slowly taken over many of the mainstream denominations.
Either you are hiding your head in the sand or you are a homosexual activist? Just because we refuse to bow down to the queer movement is NOT queer-bashing.
Queers are allowed to say and do anything nowadays and if we defend ourselves or beliefs, the WE are the bad guys. Well, F that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.