Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Smokers Have Lower IQs Than Non-Smokers
Fox News ^ | 2/23/10

Posted on 02/23/2010 11:38:41 AM PST by nickcarraway

Cigarette smokers have lower IQs than non-smokers, and the more a person smokes, the lower their IQ, a study in over 20,000 Israeli military recruits suggests.

Young men who smoked a pack of cigarettes a day or more had IQ scores 7.5 points lower than non-smokers, Dr. Mark Weiser of Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer and his colleagues found.

"Adolescents with poorer IQ scores might be targeted for programs designed to prevent smoking," they conclude in the journal Addiction.

Slideshow: Celebrities Who Quit Smoking

While there is evidence for a link between smoking and lower IQ, many studies have relied on intelligence tests given in childhood, and have also included people with mental and behavioral problems, who are both more likely to smoke and more likely to have low IQs, Weiser and his team note in their report.

To better understand the smoking-IQ relationship, the researchers looked at 20,211 18-year-old men recruited into the Israeli military. The group did not include anyone with major mental health problems, because these individuals are disqualified from military service.

According to the investigators, 28 percent of the study participants smoked at least one cigarette a day, around 3 percent said they were ex-smokers, and 68 percent had never smoked.

The smokers had significantly lower intelligence test scores than non-smokers, and this remained true even after the researchers accounted for socioeconomic status as measured by how many years of formal education a recruit's father had completed.

The average IQ for non-smokers was about 101, while it was 94 for men who had started smoking before entering the military. IQ steadily dropped as the number of cigarettes smoked increased, from 98 for people who smoked one to five cigarettes daily to 90 for those who smoked more than a pack a day.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cigarettes; iq; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: libbylu

First/second/third hand smoke...and global warming. All the same type of scam.


41 posted on 02/23/2010 1:51:55 PM PST by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

OK, I’ll play. I bet I can show that US Marines have lower IQ’s than the US Air Force. Why? Because more ground pounders smoke than pilots.

Statistics can show anything.

This study is pure BS.


42 posted on 02/23/2010 2:23:35 PM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

Inspite of what you have been told by the surgeon general, the under lying statistics in the study do not support that conclusion.

I am not suggesting by any means that smoking is a good thing. I just think that as bad as the ‘science’ is on this to say that it is CAUSAL is wrong


43 posted on 02/23/2010 2:32:17 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I notice they specify only cigarette smokers.

So, applying the current rules of agenda-driven “science”, this must mean that those of us that electively, but regularly, puff on fat, black Maduros are of course, off the charts Intels who can spontaneously levitate via sheer neuronal prowess.


44 posted on 02/23/2010 2:37:42 PM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

If second hand smoke causes cancer, young smokers should be dying like flies and there should be no long time smokers.


45 posted on 02/23/2010 2:43:48 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: the long march
Inspite of what you have been told by the surgeon general, the under lying statistics in the study do not support that conclusion. I am not suggesting by any means that smoking is a good thing. I just think that as bad as the ‘science’ is on this to say that it is CAUSAL is wrong

I don't need the surgeon general to tell me anything. My personal experience of watching family and friends who were smokers die from lung cancer, as well as my wife's experience as a medical professional, unequivocally confirm for me that smoking causes lung cancer. The fact is that not ALL lung cancer cases are caused by smoking, just the VAST MAJORITY of them.
46 posted on 02/23/2010 3:00:19 PM PST by TSgt (RE-ELECT NOBODY - VOTE THEM ALL OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s really pathetic to see smoking Nazis emerge from their shells on these threads.

they spend most of their time decrying government interference over our privates lives and laughing at such things as Michelle Obama’s crusade against fat.

(well, I laugh at that as well)

But confronted with someone smoking or the thought of someone smoking, they would gladly sign on to a law forbidding this anywhere. We’ve gone a long way down that ugly road already.

When I made a similar comment on another thread posting this study (it was posted yesterday), I was accused of something horrible.

I was accused of being a ... gasp ... smoker. I am not and never have been. I just hate the hyprocrisy of the smoking nazis.


47 posted on 02/23/2010 3:09:57 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Been smoking for 50 years (not bragging just stating a fact) but I did miss being a Mensa member by 2 points so I guess I am dumb..


48 posted on 02/23/2010 4:41:49 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Two of the most intelligent people I know, mother and son, both smoke like chimneys.


49 posted on 02/23/2010 6:46:10 PM PST by Darnright (There can never be a complete confidence in a power which is excessive. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
In before the Obama pics...

I clicked on this thread for one reason only. :p

50 posted on 02/24/2010 1:13:49 AM PST by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

statistically that is an inaccurate statement. anecdotal information is always nice but that is not what science is based upon. that is part of the problem of methodolgy with the surgeon general’s various reports. there is too much that is anecdotal ( eg no autopsy, man smoked for years, had emphysema (diagnostic)-—conclusion most likely died of lung cancer.)

I do not want to pick a fight. I am just tired of the folks in the nanny state deciding ( and this started years ago) that doing good quality science and research isn’t as important as the agenda.


51 posted on 02/24/2010 11:05:34 AM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: the long march
I do not want to pick a fight. I am just tired of the folks in the nanny state deciding ( and this started years ago) that doing good quality science and research isn’t as important as the agenda.

Good because you would be picking a fight with the WRONG person. I work in the clinical trials industry and my wife is a clinical pharmacist. Regardless, it doesn't take a billion dollar clinical study to prove the effects of smoking though many have been accomplished and have proven smoking causes cancer.
52 posted on 02/24/2010 11:16:05 AM PST by TSgt (RE-ELECT NOBODY - VOTE THEM ALL OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

And just what clinical trials have you either read or been involved in that dealt with lung cancer and its causality. Your wife the pharmacist, I am sure, is a nice lady. Still has nothing to do with how the statistics were dealt with.


53 posted on 02/24/2010 12:44:15 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: the long march

Smoke em’ if you got em’ and ping me in 10 years.

We’ll go from there...


54 posted on 02/24/2010 12:54:09 PM PST by TSgt (RE-ELECT NOBODY - VOTE THEM ALL OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

If you noticed I do not advocate smoking. Moreover I am not a smoker. I just hate the way bogus science is used to promote the nanny state agenda. Oh and by the way, nice answer to my question ——kind of like the science in question


55 posted on 02/24/2010 1:09:23 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: the long march

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2004/highlights/cancer/index.htm


56 posted on 02/24/2010 1:45:49 PM PST by TSgt (RE-ELECT NOBODY - VOTE THEM ALL OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

And all you have done is to cite the very reports I have complained about. Kind of like the CRU and Phil Jones claiming that their reports prove global warming and only idiots disagree.

My complaint is with the methodology. They make wild ass estimates based on world population and total deaths. They take anecdotal information as to cause of death ( since most bodies are not autopsied). I could go on and on but I can tell you don’t care about the science you care about the agenda.

And by the way which of those clinical trials of yours were for lung cancer causality??? Oh yeah still waiting for that answer


57 posted on 02/24/2010 1:56:41 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: the long march

You appear to have superior knowledge of oncology, epidemiology, biostatistics, protocols, etc. so I am going to consider myself defeated. All of these studies are bogus and comprised of wild assed guesses.

Doll, R. and R. Peto, Epidemiology of Cancer. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, ed. D. Warrell, et al. 2003, Oxford: OUP.
IARC, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. . Vol. 83. 2004, Lyon: IARCPress.
Sasco, A., et al., Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of the epidemiological evidence. Lung Cancer, 2004. 45: p. S3-S9. PubMed
Peto, R., et al., Mortality from smoking in developed countries, 1950-2000. . 2nd ed. 2005, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vollset, S. E., et al., Smoking and deaths between 40 and 70 years of age in women and men. Ann Intern Med, 2006. 144(6): p. 381-9. PubMed
Doll, R., Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years’ observation on male British doctors. BMJ, 1994. 309: p. 901-911. PubMed
Peto, R., et al., Mortality from smoking in developed countries 1950-2000: Indirect estimates from National Vital Statistics. 1994, Oxford: OUP.
CancerStats. Lung Cancer and Smoking - UK. 2004 Link
Doll, R. and A. Hill, Smoking and carcinoma of the lung; preliminary report. Br Med J, 1950. 2: p. 739-48. PubMed
Doll, R., et al., Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ, 2004. 328: p. 1519. PubMed
Doll, R. and R. Peto, Cigarette smoking and bronchial carcinoma: dose and time relationships among regular smokers and lifelong non-smokers. J Epidemiol Community Health, 1978. 32: p. 303-13. PubMed
Bjartveit, K. and A. Tverdal, Health consequences of smoking 1-4 cigarettes per day. Tob Control, 2005. 14(5): p. 315-20. PubMed
Polesel, J., et al., Tobacco smoking and the risk of upper aero-digestive tract cancers: A reanalysis of case-control studies using spline models. Int J Cancer, 2008. 122(10): p. 2398-402. PubMed
Bjerregaard, B. K., et al., The effect of occasional smoking on smoking-related cancers : In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Cancer Causes Control, 2006. 17(10): p. 1305-1309. PubMed
Wiencke, J., et al., Early age at smoking initiation and tobacco carcinogen DNA damage in the lung. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999. 91: p. 614-9. PubMed
Gandini, S., et al., Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer, 2008. 122(1): p. 155-64. PubMed
Kenfield, S. A., et al., Smoking and smoking cessation in relation to mortality in women. JAMA, 2008. 299(17): p. 2037-47. PubMed
Botteri, E., et al., Cigarette smoking and adenomatous polyps: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology, 2008. 134(2): p. 388-95. PubMed
Nieters, A., et al., Smoking and lymphoma risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Epidemiol, 2008. 167(9): p. 1081-9. PubMed
Brennan, P., et al., Cigarette smoking and bladder cancer in men: a pooled analysis of 11 case-control studies. Int J Cancer, 2000. 86: p. 289-94. PubMed
McLaughlin, J., et al., International renal-cell cancer study. I. Tobacco use. Int J Cancer, 1995. 60: p. 194-8. PubMed
Johnson, N., Tobacco use and oral cancer: a global perspective. J Dent Educ, 2001. 65: p. 328-39. PubMed
Bosetti, C., et al., Tobacco smoking, smoking cessation, and cumulative risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Am J Epidemiol, 2008. 167(4): p. 468-73. PubMed
Iodice, S., et al., Tobacco and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2008. 393(4): p. 535-45. PubMed
Ladeiras-Lopes, R., et al., Smoking and gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control, 2008. 19(7): p. 689-701. PubMed
Johnson, K. C., Accumulating evidence on passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer, 2005. PubMed
Lim, U., et al., Alcohol, Smoking, and Body Size in Relation to Incident Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Risk. Am J Epidemiol, 2007. PubMed
Luchtenborg, M., et al., Smoking and colorectal cancer: different effects by type of cigarettes? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007. 16(7): p. 1341-7. PubMed
Ha, M., et al., Smoking Cigarettes before First Childbirth and Risk of Breast Cancer. Am J Epidemiol, 2007. PubMed
Wakai, K., et al., Decrease in risk of lung cancer death in Japanese men after smoking cessation by age at quitting: Pooled analysis of three large-scale cohort studies. Cancer Sci, 2007. 98(4): p. 584-589. PubMed
US DHHS. The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation: A report of the Surgeon General. . 1990 Link
Godtfredsen, N. S., et al., Effect of smoking reduction on lung cancer risk. Jama, 2005. 294(12): p. 1505-10. PubMed
Tverdal, A. and K. Bjartveit, Health consequences of reduced daily cigarette consumption. Tob Control, 2006. 15: p. 472-480. PubMed
Hoffman, D. and I. Hoffman, The changing cigarette: Chemical studies and bioassays. , in Risks Associated with Smoking Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yields of Tar and Nicotine (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 13). 2001, NCI: Bethseda. p. 159-191.
Fowles, J. and E. Dybing, Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob Control, 2003. 12(4): p. 424-30. PubMed
Doull, J., et al., List of ingredients added to tobacco in the manufacture of cigarettes by six major American cigarette companies. . 1994, Washington DC: Covington and Burling.
Bernhard, D., et al., Increased serum cadmium and strontium levels in young smokers: effects on arterial endothelial cell gene transcription. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2006. 26(4): p. 833-8. PubMed
Korte, J. E., et al., The contribution of benzene to smoking-induced leukemia. Environ Health Perspect, 2000. 108(4): p. 333-9. PubMed
Kilthau, G. F., Cancer risk in relation to radioactivity in tobacco. Radiol Technol, 1996. 67(3): p. 217-22. PubMed
Little, J. B., et al., Distribution of polonium-210 in pulmonary tissues of cigarette smokers. N Engl J Med, 1965. 273(25): p. 1343-51. PubMed
Winters, T. and H. Franza, Radioactivity in cigarette smoke. N Engl J Med, 1982. 306(6): p. 364-365. PubMed
Grasseschi, R. M., et al., Cadmium accumulation and detoxification by alveolar macrophages of cigarette smokers. Chest, 2003. 124(5): p. 1924-8. PubMed
US Surgeon General, Smoking and health: a report of the Surgeon General. 1979.
dell’Omo, M., et al., Blood cadmium concentrations in the general population of Umbria, central Italy. Sci Total Environ, 1999. 226(1): p. 57-64. PubMed
Holtzman, R. and F. Ilcewicz, Lead-210 and polonium-210 in tissues of cigarette smokers. . Science, 1966. 153(1259). PubMed
Wallace, L., et al., Exposures to benzene and other volatile compounds from active and passive smoking. Arch Environ Health, 1987. 42(5): p. 272-9. PubMed
Nazaroff, W. W. and B. C. Singer, Inhalation of hazardous air pollutants from environmental tobacco smoke in US residences. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 2004. 14 Suppl 1: p. S71-7. PubMed
WHO, International Programme on Chemical Safety: Environmental Health Criteria 134. Cadmium. . 1992, Geneva: WHO.
Guo, H., et al., Risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in different indoor environments. Environ Res, 2004. 94(1): p. 57-66. PubMed
Denissenko, M., et al., Preferential formation of benzo[a]pyrene adducts at lung cancer mutational hotspots in P53. Science, 1996. 274: p. 430-2. PubMed
Feng, Z., et al., Chromium(VI) exposure enhances polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA binding at the p53 gene in human lung cells. Carcinogenesis, 2003. 24(4): p. 771-8. PubMed
Hartwig, A. and T. Schwerdtle, Interactions by carcinogenic metal compounds with DNA repair processes: toxicological implications. Toxicol Lett, 2002. 127(1-3): p. 47-54. PubMed
Vleeming, W., et al., The role of nitric oxide in cigarette smoking and nicotine addiction. Nicotine Tob Res, 2002. 4(3): p. 341-8. PubMed
Yamaguchi, H., et al., Toluene at environmentally relevant low levels disrupts differentiation of astrocyte precursor cells. Arch Environ Health, 2002. 57(3): p. 232-8. PubMed
Kumar, V. and O. P. Tandon, Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in tobacco smokers. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 1996. 40(4): p. 381-4. PubMed
Royal College of Physicians, Nicotine Addiction in Britain: A report of the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. 2000.
Epping-Jordan, M. P., et al., Dramatic decreases in brain reward function during nicotine withdrawal. Nature, 1998. 393(6680): p. 76-9. PubMed
Russell, M., et al., Relation of nicotine yield of cigarettes to blood nicotine concentrations in smokers. Br Med J, 1980. 280: p. 972-6. PubMed
Hammond, D., et al., Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2005. 14(6): p. 1370-5. PubMed
Benowitz, N., et al., Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine. N Engl J Med, 1983. 309: p. 139-42. PubMed
Kozlowski, L., et al., Prevalence of the misuse of ultra-low-tar cigarettes by blocking filter vents. Am J Public Health, 1988. 78: p. 694-5. PubMed
Benowitz, N. L., et al., Carcinogen Exposure during Short-term Switching from Regular to “Light” Cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2005. 14(6): p. 1376-83. PubMed
Djordjevic, M., et al., Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000. 92: p. 106-11. PubMed
Kuper, H., et al., Tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and their interaction in the causation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer, 2000. 85: p. 498-502. PubMed
Boyle, P., et al., European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003). Ann Oncol, 2003. 14(7): p. 973-1005. PubMed
Castellsague, X., et al., Independent and joint effects of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking on the risk of esophageal cancer in men and women. Int J Cancer, 1999. 82: p. 657-64. PubMed
Sjodahl, K., et al., Smoking and alcohol drinking in relation to risk of gastric cancer: A population-based, prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer, 2006. 120(1): p. 128-32. PubMed
Boeing, H., Alcohol and risk of cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract: first analysis of the EPIC data. IARC Sci Publ, 2002. 156: p. 151-4. PubMed
Key, T., et al., The effect of diet on risk of cancer. Lancet, 2002. 360: p. 861-868. PubMed
Darby, S., et al., Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ, 2004. Epub ahead of print. PubMed
Department of Health, Secondhand smoke: Review of evidence since 1998. Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health 2004. PubMed
Taylor, R., et al., Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent. Int J Epidemiol, 2007. 36(5): p. 1048-59. PubMed
Stayner, L., et al., Lung Cancer Risk and Workplace Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Am J Public Health, 2007. PubMed
Jamrozik, K., Estimate of deaths attributable to passive smoking among UK adults: database analysis. BMJ, 2005. Epub ahead of print. PubMed
Otsuka, R., et al., Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults. JAMA, 2001. 286: p. 436-41. PubMed
Royal College of Physicians, Smoking and the Young. 1992.
Vineis, P., et al., Environmental tobacco smoke and risk of respiratory cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in former smokers and never smokers in the EPIC prospective study. BMJ, 2005. Epub ahead of print. PubMed
Bjerregaard, B. K., et al., Tobacco smoke and bladder cancer-in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Int J Cancer, 2006. PubMed
Anderson, M., et al., Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and prenatal maternal smoking: rising attributed risk in the Back to Sleep era. BMC Med, 2005. 3: p. 4. PubMed
Kriz, P., et al., Parental smoking, socio-economic factors, and risk of invasive meningococcal disease in children: a population based case-control study. . Arch Dis Child, 2000. 83: p. 117-21. PubMed
Yolton, K., et al., Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and cognitive abilities among U.S. children and adolescents. Environ Health Perspect, 2005. 113: p. 98-103. PubMed
Larsen, L., et al., Stereologic examination of placentas from mothers who smoke during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002. 186: p. 531-7. PubMed
Misra, D., et al., Maternal smoking and birth weight: interaction with parity and mother’s own in utero exposure to smoking. Epidemiology, 2005. 16: p. 288-93. PubMed
Luciano, A., et al., The influence of maternal passive and light active smoking on intrauterine growth and body composition of the newborn. Eur J Clin Nutr, 1998. 52: p. 760-3. PubMed
Cnattingius, S., The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res, 2004. 6(Suppl 2): p. S125-40. PubMed
Cogliano, V., et al., Smokeless tobacco and tobacco-related nitrosamines. Lancet Oncol, 2004. 5: p. 708. PubMed
Critchley, J. and B. Unal, Health effects associated with smokeless tobacco: a systematic review. Thorax, 2003. 58: p. 435-43. PubMed
Winn, D. M., et al., Snuff dipping and oral cancer among women in the southern United States. N Engl J Med, 1981. 304(13): p. 745-9. PubMed
Brunnemann, K. and D. Hoffman, Chemical composition of smokeless tobacco products, in NCI Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph. 1993. p. 96-108. Link
Benowitz, N., Pharmacology of smokeless tobacco use: nicotine addiction and nicotine-related health consequences. , in NCI Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph. 1993. p. 219-228. Link
Luo, J., et al., Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 2007. 369(9578): p. 2015-20. PubMed
Zendehdel, K., et al., Risk of gastroesophageal cancer among smokers and users of Scandinavian moist snuff. Int J Cancer, 2008. 122(5): p. 1095-9. PubMed


58 posted on 02/24/2010 2:10:10 PM PST by TSgt (RE-ELECT NOBODY - VOTE THEM ALL OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

Did you even read the titles of some of your cited sources??? Please don’t embarass yourself further. You still don’t understand the point. you merely have an agenda. That;s fine with me but don’t try and pretend that it is science ( Please go check your themometer now)


59 posted on 02/24/2010 2:26:24 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Makes sense. You’d have to be a fool to pay $50 for a carton of smokes these days.


60 posted on 02/24/2010 2:27:30 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson