Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women to Serve on Subs, Gates Tells Congress
Armed Forces Press Service ^ | 2/24/10 | Donna Miles

Posted on 02/24/2010 7:59:45 AM PST by meandog

Women to Serve on Subs, Gates Tells Congress

By Donna Miles American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Feb. 23, 2010 - The Navy plans to repeal its ban on women serving on submarines, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has informed Congress.

Gates signed a letter Feb. 19 informing Congress of the Navy's plan to lift the policy, which it intends to do through the phased-in assignment of women to submarines, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell confirmed today.

The secretary endorsed the plan, the brainchild of Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, Morrell said.

No change can take effect until Congress has been in session for 30 days following the notification, Navy Lt. Justin Cole, a Navy spokesman said.

Mabus, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead and other Navy leaders have looked closely at the issues involved with integrating women into the submarine force, including close working conditions and accommodations, he said.

No funds will be spent to reconfigure submarines to accommodate female crew members until the Navy Department presents the phased-approach plan to Congress.

Mabus has been a strong proponent of the policy change since being confirmed to his post in May.

"I believe women should have every opportunity to serve at sea, and that includes aboard submarines," he told reporters in October. Roughead, in a statement issued in September, said his experience commanding a mixed-gender surface combatant ship makes him "very comfortable" with the idea of integrating women into the submarine force.

"I am familiar with the issues as well as the value of diverse crews," Roughead said.

The integration of women into the submarine force increases the talent pool and therefore, overall submarine readiness, Cole said.

"We know there are capable young women in the Navy and women who are interested in the Navy who have the talent and desire to succeed in the submarine force," he said. "Enabling them to serve there is best for the submarine force and our Navy."

The policy change – and the Navy's ability to work through the issues involved -- is not without precedent, he noted. In 1993, the Navy changed its policy to permit women to serve on surface combat ships.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: agenda; bhodod; bhosecdef; bubbleheads; submarines; usnavy; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
More PC...
1 posted on 02/24/2010 7:59:46 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

(((ping)))


2 posted on 02/24/2010 8:00:05 AM PST by meandog (OWEbummercare: "Arbeit Macht Frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Hmmmm not sure what kind of woman would want to be cramped up in small untidy quarters with recycled air/water for months at a time.


3 posted on 02/24/2010 8:02:02 AM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

This should improve efficiency. No more going to port for promiscuous sexual encounters!


4 posted on 02/24/2010 8:02:30 AM PST by IamConservative (Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Another disaster is brewing ...

With tight living space ... expect more pregnancies.


5 posted on 02/24/2010 8:04:20 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

Isn’t one the nicknames for subs, pigboats?


6 posted on 02/24/2010 8:05:22 AM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: meandog
“No funds will be spent to reconfigure submarines to accommodate female crew members until the Navy Department presents the phased-approach plan to Congress. “

Hey, maybe they can save water and shower together?

7 posted on 02/24/2010 8:05:39 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Moron express.


8 posted on 02/24/2010 8:07:00 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2457642/posts


9 posted on 02/24/2010 8:07:21 AM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I don’t think women in close quarters with a bunch of seamen is a good idea...


10 posted on 02/24/2010 8:08:40 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (The liberals are asking us to give Obama more time. Is 25 to life enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Gives a new meaning to hot racking!


11 posted on 02/24/2010 8:08:52 AM PST by cameraeye (A happy kafar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meandog

When you note the cost of training a baby bubblehead before they even get assigned to a fleet submarine, then note the high rate of pregnancy among women assigned to fleet surface ships...the cost of this latest social engineering to the taxpayers is STAGGERING.

Dumb move by Gates and the Administration. Very bad move.


12 posted on 02/24/2010 8:09:43 AM PST by Badeye (Still pretending Long Island is Manhattan, willie? (laughing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

This is just another reason to have abortion in the health bill. These idiots can’t figure out why women get pregnant aboard ship.


13 posted on 02/24/2010 8:10:38 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nmh

On YOUR nickel!


14 posted on 02/24/2010 8:11:11 AM PST by SMARTY ("What luck for rulers that men do not think. " Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meandog

This is a very bad move.


15 posted on 02/24/2010 8:11:27 AM PST by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

It’s ok. They’ll just have to shorten their tours to a week or two at a time between ports.


16 posted on 02/24/2010 8:12:02 AM PST by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Just wait until they become officers.

I can see the redecorating already.

17 posted on 02/24/2010 8:13:58 AM PST by AGreatPer (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meandog

PMS symptoms
mood swings
irritability
depression
anxiety
angry outbursts
confusion or fuzzy thinking
tearfulness
fatigue
insomnia
changes in libido
overeating
cravings, especially for salty or sweet foods
alcohol intolerance
acne
hives
abdominal and pelvic cramps
bloating
weight gain
headaches
menstrual migraines
breast swelling and pain
edema (visible swelling, particularly in the hands, feet and legs)
asthma
sinus problems
sore throat
worsening of chronic conditions like arthritis and ulcers
difficulty with coordination, being more prone to accidents
dizziness, decreased balance
heart pounding (palpitation)
nausea
fainting
urinary problems


18 posted on 02/24/2010 8:15:12 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Clearly, our military is not about protecting the country, it’s about providing opportunities to diverse people....


19 posted on 02/24/2010 8:15:19 AM PST by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Hmmm... After giving this some thought, I can see a good side to this in a Dr. Strangelove sort of way...

It all depends on the numbers, "undt certain characteristics of ze vomen selected for such duty." :)

20 posted on 02/24/2010 8:15:24 AM PST by OKSooner (NoMoBHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson