Skip to comments.
Energy Secretary Chu Says U.S. Must Decrease Energy Use
Dow Jones via Rig Zone ^
| 2/24/10
| Nour Malas
Posted on 02/24/2010 10:27:05 AM PST by thackney
U.S. energy secretary Steven Chu said Wednesday that the U.S. must decrease its energy use to allow developing nations the room to grow, while emphasizing that prosperity doesn't have to come with a large carbon footprint.
"We believe we have to decrease our use of energy to allow headroom for the developing nations to grow their economies," Chu said in a speech in Abu Dhabi, capital of the United Arab Emirates.
"There is no law of physics that says prosperity is proportional to carbon emissions," Chu said.
(Excerpt) Read more at rigzone.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2010; antiamericanism; democrats; domesticenergy; drillheredrillnow; energy; fifthcolumn; liberalfascism; marxism; naturalgas; oil; redistribution; starkravingsocialism; stevenchu; uglyamerican2point0; unamerican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-94 next last
1
posted on
02/24/2010 10:27:05 AM PST
by
thackney
To: thackney
2
posted on
02/24/2010 10:27:53 AM PST
by
egannacht
(Inalienable rights granted by...)
To: thackney
We already have, it’s called a recession!
3
posted on
02/24/2010 10:28:17 AM PST
by
Titus-Maximus
(Light from Light)
To: thackney
“We believe we have to decrease our use of energy to allow headroom for the developing nations to grow their economies”
Any idea what this clown thinks he’s trying to say?
To: Titus-Maximus
Maybe recession isn’t good enough for this tool, maybe he wants depression.
5
posted on
02/24/2010 10:29:11 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(Party at the governor's mansion, Columbus Ohio.)
To: thackney
To: thackney
U.S. energy secretary Steven Chu said Wednesday that the U.S. must decrease its energy use to allow developing nations the room to grow, So Americans need to scale back their lifestyles so that others can live large.
The GOP should be able to ride this one statement to victory in 2012.
7
posted on
02/24/2010 10:29:49 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: thackney
U.S. energy secretary Steven Chu said Wednesday that the U.S. must decrease its energy use to allow developing nations the room to growGood. I propose that all energy to his home and office be cut off, and all of his vehicles deactivated.
8
posted on
02/24/2010 10:30:09 AM PST
by
American Quilter
(Mourning Capt Phil Harris of the Cornelia Marie.)
To: Chi-townChief
We need to help China achieve their full potential.
9
posted on
02/24/2010 10:30:17 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
chu is just another nut.
ozero told us that we would know who is by the people he surrounds himself with.
He doesn’t have one person near him that has any sense.
To: thackney
Is there one rational person in this administration? I cannot think of any.
11
posted on
02/24/2010 10:31:09 AM PST
by
hometoroost
(I am not a crook, I did not have sex with that woman, and I am not an ideologue.)
To: Chi-townChief
“Screw the USA, we owe our loyalty to the Communist and Muslim 3rd World”
That is what he is trying to say!
12
posted on
02/24/2010 10:32:22 AM PST
by
Kansas58
To: thackney
13
posted on
02/24/2010 10:32:25 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
To: thackney
“There is no law of physics that says prosperity is proportional to carbon emissions,”
No, but there is a law of economics that says that prosperity is proportional to available energy.
What a clown.
To: Chi-townChief
He is trying to say that China has used our dollars to secure their energy future. Now the US is going to experience downgraded lifestyle expectations. Future US generations will not be better off than past generations because energy will cost more and they will have higher taxes to repay the debt.
To: thackney
It’s all the non-productive illegal immigrants who sit at home all day consuming energy and resources....
16
posted on
02/24/2010 10:33:22 AM PST
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona.....)
To: steelyourfaith
17
posted on
02/24/2010 10:33:23 AM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Chi-townChief
This b!tch thinks America should be a turd world nation so zimbabwe will be slightly less of a hell hole.
LLS
18
posted on
02/24/2010 10:33:32 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
To: thackney
Chu is a control freak and full of it. Only someone in government would truly believe this nonsense.
To: thackney
We are going to add 130 million more people in the next 40 years, 75% due to immigration. How are we going to decrease our use of energy?
20
posted on
02/24/2010 10:35:26 AM PST
by
kabar
To: updatedscreenname
Now the US is going to experience downgraded lifestyle expectations. Objectively speaking, that's the real goal of this administration. A much poorer, less powerful, less comfortable, less happy, less secure America.
they will have higher taxes to repay the debt
Hard to tax people who aren't employed.
21
posted on
02/24/2010 10:35:54 AM PST
by
Campion
("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
To: thackney
I’d better lay in a good supply of candles.
22
posted on
02/24/2010 10:36:05 AM PST
by
Salvey
To: thackney
Less energy, less wealth, less prosperity, less freedom
23
posted on
02/24/2010 10:36:36 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
To: Chi-townChief
Any idea what this clown thinks hes trying to say? Yeah, just repeating the 'Spread the Wealth' commie mantra... Somehow they think impoverishing our nation will make other nations wealthier.
(A) If that were so, that isn't a good thing - our elected officials should promote the well-being of the Nation they were elected to serve,
And
(B) It isn't so. Reaganomics showed that the best way to increase everyone's prosperity is to allow everyone's prosperity to increase... Hammering down one segment (i.e., 'the wealthy' ... otherwise defined as: 'anyone who makes more than you do') just increases the misery across the board...
These commies don't get it; and they are a menace to our Nation.
24
posted on
02/24/2010 10:36:42 AM PST
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: thackney
Ah yes. Growth through shrinkage.
These people truly are morons.
25
posted on
02/24/2010 10:36:54 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(Vote Mitt Romney in 2012 -- We need an even bigger fraud in DC than Obama.)
To: Chi-townChief
He wants us all poorer.
Same guy who proposed painting all roofs black to stop global warming.
26
posted on
02/24/2010 10:37:12 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
To: thackney
"There is no law of physics that says prosperity is proportional to carbon emissions," Chu said.
Well no, there isn't. There's a pretty clear economic correlation, however, and prosperity is based on economic considerations, not compliance with the laws of physics. There's also no law of physics that says we can't build hundreds of nuclear reactors to take care of our nation's energy needs far into the future with minimal carbon emission - why exactly do we need to curb our energy usage?
To: thackney
Chu serves as an example that you can win a Nobel Prize(in a very esoteric area) and still be dumb as a box of rocks. Anyone who knew Linus Pauling could have told you that.
28
posted on
02/24/2010 10:38:24 AM PST
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: thackney; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...
29
posted on
02/24/2010 10:40:11 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: thackney
“This is Ning. You can help him reach his full potential by riding your bicycle to work, or you can turn the page.”
To: thackney
All nations must get rid of their cars, airplanes, trains, and other forms of transportation and roads, all forms of energy generation, tear down all the buildings and only live in grass huts. That’s the green way!
You must reduce your standard of living until you end up as a Turd World Nation. It’s all a part of making all nations ‘equal.’
To: thackney
We’ll use “less energy” to give the 3rd world the headroom to grow?
I believe I’ll go take a nap now. Wouldn’t want to use up energy *working* or *creating wealth* or anything like that
32
posted on
02/24/2010 10:42:48 AM PST
by
silverleaf
(We don't want everyone in Washington to get along, We want them to get out of the way)
To: egannacht
33
posted on
02/24/2010 10:43:06 AM PST
by
silverleaf
(We don't want everyone in Washington to get along, We want them to get out of the way)
To: thackney
Africa actually has the highest CO2 emissions in the world. Why isn’t he telling the Africans to shut it down?
To: thackney
"There is no law of physics that says prosperity is proportional to carbon emissions," Chu said. Dumb statement. There is also no law of physics that says democrats may hold high government positions.
35
posted on
02/24/2010 10:43:56 AM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: truthguy
Pfft. Experimental physics. He was a monkey at a typewriter.
I’d like to see him propose shutting down the superconducting supercollider to save energy. See how his physics buddies react to that.
To: thackney
Did not know that energy was a zero sum game...
37
posted on
02/24/2010 10:44:49 AM PST
by
Deagle
To: thackney
"We believe we have to decrease our use of energy to allow headroom for the developing nations to grow their economies," Chu said in a speech in Abu Dhabi, capital of the United Arab Emirates. This whole administration is anti-American commies.
Let's replace them all with slightly less anti-American RINO commie-Lites.
38
posted on
02/24/2010 10:45:22 AM PST
by
meadsjn
(Sarah 2012, or sooner)
To: thackney
"There is no law of physics that says prosperity is proportional to carbon emissions," Chu said.
There is a law of economics that states just that however.
39
posted on
02/24/2010 10:46:18 AM PST
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: truthguy
40
posted on
02/24/2010 10:48:22 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
To: egannacht
41
posted on
02/24/2010 10:50:34 AM PST
by
A_Tradition_Continues
(formerly known as Politicalwit ...05/28/98 Class of '98)
To: thackney
"There is no law of physics that says prosperity is proportional to carbon emissions," Chu said... Then why do developing countires need more energy to grow?
I'll wait...
42
posted on
02/24/2010 10:50:45 AM PST
by
gogeo
("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
To: thackney
Rationing. Just like with transportation, income, credit, education, housing, health care.
It’s all about control through rationing.
43
posted on
02/24/2010 10:51:16 AM PST
by
henkster
(A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
To: thackney
How much Natgas, Coal, Oil, Oil shale/sands do we have? How do you ‘help’ or ‘make room’ for others by lowering yourself to ‘other’ standards’?
Compare Cary Grant’s line from some 1950s movie..... (paraphrase) We do not raise standards of living of other countries by lowering ours, but, rather, by encouraging the other countries’ standards to rise to ours.
44
posted on
02/24/2010 10:51:38 AM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: thackney
Who would be stupid enough to believe this nonsense?
Ahh, Chu.
45
posted on
02/24/2010 10:52:31 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(The liberals are asking us to give Obama more time. Is 25 to life enough?)
To: thackney
"decrease its energy use to allow developing nations the room to grow" From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.
Commies.
46
posted on
02/24/2010 10:54:36 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Liberal Massachussetts says: "FUBO!")
To: thackney
“the U.S. must decrease its energy use to allow developing nations the room to grow”
Utterly ignorant zero-sum marxist “thinking.” If the US scales back, we won’t be able to contribute to those developing nations and they will stagnate. Oh, wait, that’s already happening.
What a moron.
47
posted on
02/24/2010 10:54:45 AM PST
by
piytar
(Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
To: Campion
“Objectively speaking, that’s the real goal of this administration. A much poorer, less powerful, less comfortable, less happy, less secure America”
Yup, and may I add “that is easier to RULE over.”
48
posted on
02/24/2010 10:56:05 AM PST
by
piytar
(Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
To: thackney
What collection of idiots decided this guy deserved his PhD?
This man’s philosophy is the epitome of liberalism - instead of coming up with a way to reduce the cost and increase the availability of energy, Chu’s solution is to impose limitations on the very people who would likely solve his problem.
Is it 2012 yet?
To: El Cid
“These commies don’t get it; and they are a menace to our Nation.”
Some, mostly donk voters, don’t get it, but wannabe dictators entirely get it. General prosperity is a obstacle to seizing total power, both because people can’t be scared into it and because prosperous people have better options for resistance (e.g., forming TEA party movements).
50
posted on
02/24/2010 10:58:09 AM PST
by
piytar
(Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson