Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How can reporters reach Sarah Palin?
Politico ^ | Feb. 24, 2010 | Michael Calderone

Posted on 02/24/2010 5:29:03 PM PST by Al B.

POLITICO’s Andy Barr reported earlier that Meg Stapleton, spokesperson and top adviser to Sarah Palin resigned to spend more time with family.

Now CNN’s Peter Hamby follows up on the news and writes how not only did McCain campaign staffers and Palin insiders grumble about Stapleton’s handling of Palin, but also journalists.

Members of the political press corps have also long been frustrated with Stapleton, who was the primary conduit between Palin and members of the media since the end of the 2008 presidential race, but rarely responded to phone calls or e-mails. When Stapleton did, they were often terse or combative.

He’s right that getting a comment or sometimes even an acknowledgment from Stapleton could be difficult. I tried several times in recent months on Palin-related stories, and Stapleton never responded, while her voice mail was repeatedly full and unable to accept messages. [UPDATE:It turns out Stapleton had two e-mail accounts, and some reporters tell me they had an easier time getting through to her on the one I wasn't using. Still, other reporters say they had trouble getting a response even using that other account].

Since the mainstream media can't get enough of covering Palin, the question remains as to how reporters can even reach Palin, who these days is more likely to heard via Facebook or Fox News.

Hamby reports that “there are no immediate plans to hire a replacement for Stapleton.” So as of right now the only contact seems to be through Palin’s PAC, which provides a phone number which goes right to an answering machine and an e-mail address with no specific person to contact (info@sarahpac.com).

Reporters will get a quick response by e-mailing the “info” account, although not necessarily a personal one: “Thank you for your e-mail. Due to the large number of responses, it may take awhile for us to fully respond. Thank you."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canttrustpolitico; lying4obama; lying4romney; msm4obama; msm4romney; palin; politico4dnc; politico4obamam; politico4romney; politicoagenda; politicohaters; politicoscheming; servingobama; servingrinos; servingromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2010 5:29:04 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al B.

By ‘reporters’, of course, they mean dishonest,Obama- worshiping, fact distorting, lying attack dogs.


2 posted on 02/24/2010 5:32:55 PM PST by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

You gotta love it.


3 posted on 02/24/2010 5:33:41 PM PST by Misplaced Texan (July 4, 2009 - the first day of the 2nd Revolution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Hamby reports that “there are no immediate plans to hire a replacement for Stapleton.”

Why the heck not?

4 posted on 02/24/2010 5:34:37 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Members of the political press corps have also long been frustrated with Stapleton, who was the primary conduit between Palin and members of the media since the end of the 2008 presidential race, but rarely responded to phone calls or e-mails.

So let me get this straight. They bitch about Palin but Obo hasn't had a press conference in eight months?

5 posted on 02/24/2010 5:35:11 PM PST by VeniVidiVici ("Bring out yer dead! Bring out your dead!" - Cries of a Navy Corpseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

6 posted on 02/24/2010 5:37:07 PM PST by McGruff (Don't criticize. Explain to me who I should support other than Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong
"By ‘reporters’, of course, they mean dishonest,Obama- worshiping, fact distorting, lying attack dogs."

Uhhh . . . you mean News Pukes? Those 'reporters'?

7 posted on 02/24/2010 5:37:11 PM PST by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The msm acts as tho Sarah is more important than the presidente.

One single line on her Facebook page and the world takes notice.

One twitter and the msm gets it’s panties in a twist.


8 posted on 02/24/2010 5:37:29 PM PST by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

BobJ is polishing his resume as we speak.


9 posted on 02/24/2010 5:38:01 PM PST by rabidralph ("Precedenting" is a lot tougher than community organizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Seems to be easier to get ahold of Palin than it is for FOX to get ahold of Barry Soetero, ‘ceptin if your BOR.

He has inroads and is lookin out for y’all morons.


10 posted on 02/24/2010 5:39:35 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

I wonder how much the money the left pays their 17 yr old
lemmings to write this stuff for their blogs.


11 posted on 02/24/2010 5:39:37 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

These morons trashed her repeatedly during the campaign and wondered why later they weren’t invited for tea?


12 posted on 02/24/2010 5:39:41 PM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
So let me get this straight. They bitch about Palin but Obo hasn't had a press conference in eight months?

0bama has a press secretary that gives press conferences every day, not to mention a whole cabinet and cabinet secretaries and what nots who regularly interact with the press.
If Sarah Palin wants to run a proper professional political operation, she'd better get a competent press secretary pretty darn quick. She is making enough money right now to be able to afford one.
13 posted on 02/24/2010 5:40:31 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carley

Heh...isn’t that the truth!


14 posted on 02/24/2010 5:41:26 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

I have no idea why Politico is even complaining, If Sarah wasn’t so gracious, Politico would be ban. Politico was the one’s just a month ago claim that “Palin believes that Iraq was behind 9/11” which she never said in a transcript, they lied! Then they claim that in a speech which they didn’t hear in MN that Sarah was implying that Obama was the one that moved “In God We Trust” to the side of the coin, she was just using an anecdotal and was talking about the society as a whole moving away from God. Politico has written many other things that were outrageous about Sarah Palin...check there history, it’s right there!


15 posted on 02/24/2010 5:42:12 PM PST by Bigtigermike (Loose lips sink ships, stay away RINO's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
I personally am not concerned. If the press has questions about her schedule, they can call the Washington Speakers Bureau.

Otherwise, they're just looking for dirt to trash her with or to respond to dirt they've already written. Why should she respond to that?

She knows who to call if she's got something to say.

16 posted on 02/24/2010 5:44:40 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Greta doesn't have a problem getting to Palin.
17 posted on 02/24/2010 5:45:26 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Why do they want to reach Sarah? They don’t have to reach her with all the lies they make up.


18 posted on 02/24/2010 5:46:12 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Wow, talk about hubris

These dirtbags trash her family like New Year Days parade and expect to get a timely response ?


19 posted on 02/24/2010 5:46:13 PM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Thank you!! How arrogant of them to demand anything from her or her camp after all of the things they have done!


20 posted on 02/24/2010 5:49:40 PM PST by Bigtigermike (Loose lips sink ships, stay away RINO's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

They only want to be able to talk to her so they can misquote her and tear her up. She’s onto their game.

Why give them ammo? They just don’t like that she has just as much disdain for them as they do her.

Bush was president. He had to play the game. At this point, she doesn’t. Let them seethe.


21 posted on 02/24/2010 5:50:11 PM PST by I still care (I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

‘Cause they aren’t going to be answering any more questions for awhile, he said, stating the obvious...magritte


22 posted on 02/24/2010 5:52:13 PM PST by magritte ("I will give this monkey for lunch to Mr Sata,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Maybe they just don’t want to announce it until they’ve got someone in place, though it is surprising that Stapleton wouldn’t stay on until they had a replacement. Maybe Palin didn’t want her to feel that she was being let go directly for an upgrade. Donno. But it could be good news if they ramp up to a national-class PR rep, and I can’t believe they won’t have someone in that role.


23 posted on 02/24/2010 5:53:13 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
That's pretty short sighted, inefficient, and self defeating.
The Washington Speakers Bureau is not a Sarah Palin's press agent. They just book and organize her speaking engagements. They don't answer political questions about her policies, about 0bama, about 0bamacare, or about anything else.
If Sarah Palin is serous about influencing debate on current issues, and influencing the 2010 elections, she'd better get herself a press secretary very quick. It's the first item on the agenda. And it's not just for the mainstream media either. It's for conservative blogs, talk radio, and every kind of media that need to talk to her about any issues.
What the heck is she doing with her PAC money and all the hundreds of thousands she's been getting for all these speeches anyways?
24 posted on 02/24/2010 5:54:28 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

No, they bitched about President Bush and press conferences but they are pretty damn meek about Obama.
Exerpts:



More on Bush’s (Lack Of) Press Conferences
By Patrick on Sep 18, 2008 10:50 AM

We told you earlier about the White House press corps’ frustration with President Bush’s lack of availability and then we found this nugget from yesterday’s WH press briefing with Dana Perino:

Q The President, I don’t think, has had a news conference in about two months. Does he feel that kind of forum doesn’t really have much use for him now to communicate his ideas, especially on the financial developments?

MS. PERINO: I’m sure he misses you all greatly, but — (laughter) — look, I think we have to be realistic —

Q We miss him.

MS. PERINO: — that if you guys had him in here, almost everything would be geared towards the election, and he is cognizant of that. He wants to make sure that this election remains fully focused on the two candidates. He’s not on the ballot. This is about John McCain and Senator Obama and how those two present themselves to the American people. And the President is reluctant to be in a place where there’s going to be a lot of competition for questions that get him involved in the 2008 campaign —

Q How about if we keep it to the he economy?

Q So no press conferences for the next 48 days?

MS. PERINO: Not — I didn’t say that. I just said that I’m telling you that one of the reasons that we haven’t — I mean, every time that I would think about maybe having a press conference, the news of the day would be such that we might be talking about lipstick on a pig, and the President is just not going to get involved in it.


Bush has held the fewest press conferences, and most of the ones he holds are scripted. Journalists are afraid to speak up or be banned. Is this a democratic government by the people for the people? Or a secret government by Halliburton for Halliburton? Why is there no buzz over this?

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/10/22/1066631501...

US President George Bush will dodge media questioning during his Australian visit, in a breach of normal protocol.


White House press corps criticizes lack of news conferences

Keywords: White House


As much as we bitch about his lack of press conferences and the lack of access the press has to him, maybe we’re better off just sticking him in a closet until January 2009.

Ed Henry’s wish list

I asked Ed Henry, who reports on the White House for Time Warner’s CNN, what would be on his wish list for Obama.

“I’d want more access than we had in the past eight years,” he said.. “The President-elect has indicated he’d take questions more frequently that President Bush has done at a press conference.”

Henry also hopes that President Obama will hold press conferences more frequently, perhaps two or three a week.

“President Bush has had stretches of months without a press conference,” Henry said. “This has been a pattern far too much.”


25 posted on 02/24/2010 5:56:15 PM PST by VeniVidiVici ("Bring out yer dead! Bring out your dead!" - Cries of a Navy Corpseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

I guess some find it hard to believe that Palin or Stapleton would want to limit their access to the haters.


26 posted on 02/24/2010 5:56:46 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Bigtigermike

This is not about Politico.
It’s about how the press can contact her, including conservative press like the Weekly Standard, NRO, conservative talk radio etc.
Unless she wants to answer her own phone/emails from all these hundreds of press people that want to talk to her every day? How is that efficient?


28 posted on 02/24/2010 5:59:21 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fairhairedboy
I would..only thing is, I don't smoke. Never smoked in my life.
Perhaps you'll smoke your own joint?
29 posted on 02/24/2010 6:00:44 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I know!!, why can’t Freepers understand She has almost the entire months of March and April filled with speeches and events all across the country, she does have other staff members with her if something important came along for the media....That’ why I’m glad her camp doesn’t leak info, because then we would have not only the press but people here trying to micromanage everything she does.


30 posted on 02/24/2010 6:02:43 PM PST by Bigtigermike (Loose lips sink ships, stay away RINO's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
What the heck is she doing with her PAC money and all the hundreds of thousands she's been getting for all these speeches anyways?

Her speaking fees are her personal income. As for her PAC expenses, you can see the detail of her 2H 2009 disbursements here. Candidate contributions, travel, consulting & legal fees, mostly.

31 posted on 02/24/2010 6:15:19 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
I wouldn't want to talk with a bunch of "Obama lap-dogs" either!

Duh!

32 posted on 02/24/2010 6:15:24 PM PST by MountainDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Yo, Calderone! She’s just not that into you.

- JP


33 posted on 02/24/2010 6:20:35 PM PST by Josh Painter ("We cannot spare this woman. She fights" - David Karki, regarding Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
I guess some find it hard to believe that Palin or Stapleton would want to limit their access to the haters.

I'm sure when the media starts treating her with at least a shred of respect, she'll more than return the favor. :)

Otherwise, she can do what she needs to do right now without them. If she declares for president, that's a different story obviously, but it's not exactly like she's burning bridges with this move...LOL. They hate her with a passion and essentially write NOTHING positive about her.

34 posted on 02/24/2010 6:21:34 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
I am not worried about her PAC accounts or suggesting there is anything wrong with her accounts at ll. What I am saying is, she needs a press secretary and other staff to keep her political organizations going, and she can either use her PAC money to hire the staff, or pay for them herself.
It's simple really. She can either be a private citizen, and stay-at-home mom looking after her family, or if she wants to be a major mover of political affairs in this country, then she has to hire the staff to do it. She certainly has the wherewithal to do it.
Look, she is the most in demand political figure in the GOP. There is no way, she is going to be able to run everything herself without the supporting political staff. You can't run an influential, national political organization as a mom and pop outfit.
35 posted on 02/24/2010 6:27:10 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
What I am saying is, she needs a press secretary and other staff to keep her political organizations going, and she can either use her PAC money to hire the staff, or pay for them herself.

And what I am saying is that maybe we all need to start thinking outside the box because I KNOW she is.

As for other staff, she has that. She contracts it out. Why does she have to have a press secretary for the next few months? She has an aggressive speaking schedule that's published, she can respond on the worst of the negative stories either on FOX or FACEBOOK and believe me....Greta, Hannity, BOR, Rush, Levin et al. can pick up the phone and talk to her anytime they want.

The MSM has shown ZERO inclination to treat her as a serious political figure so I just don't get the need for her to have to have a press secretary, at least for now. We just disagree on that.

As I said in a post above, if she declares for President, that's different.

36 posted on 02/24/2010 6:40:55 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
How can reporters reach Sarah Palin?

At Sarah's pleasure, they need her, she doesn't need them.

37 posted on 02/24/2010 6:55:00 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Why does she have to have a press secretary for the next few months?

Because the elections are only 9 months away. Because the primaries are already underway, even as we speak (Michigan already had their primaries). Because she is the most influential Republican out there. Because this November's congressional elections are about the most important elections in our lifetime. We are talking about whether this country continues to be a great country, or is reduced to a has-been communist, wasteland with a bankrupt government. This is not exactly the time for Sarah Palin, not to have a press secretary. How the heck is the press supposed to contact her on any issues? I just don't get it.

38 posted on 02/24/2010 6:56:23 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
WaPo has a story up on this which also details the Palin inner circle. It includes this:
* Doug McMarlin: McMarlin is a partner at GreyShockley, an Ohio-based consulting firm, and did advance work for the McCain campaign in 2008. He along with Jason Recher travel with Palin on trips. McMarlin is expected to take on a broadened role -- particularly in dealing with the press -- following Stapleton's departure.
Apparently he will pick up the slack, at least temporarily.
39 posted on 02/24/2010 7:13:13 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Why are you so worried about what Sarah Palin says or does, you've only been here since the day the "Messiah" was elected.

"Don't go away mad, just go away".

40 posted on 02/24/2010 7:23:17 PM PST by fedupjohn ("Facts are stubborn things." Ron Reagan.......Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Ah well, that would have to do for now, I guess.
Thanks for the post.


41 posted on 02/24/2010 7:25:31 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
Umm.....who let you out of the nut house?
For your own good, I'd strongly advise you to take your insanity elsewhere.
42 posted on 02/24/2010 7:48:28 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Umm.....who let you out of the nut house? For your own good, I'd strongly advise you to take your insanity elsewhere.

Excuse me, you've been here since Nov 7, 2008 and your telling me to go somewhere, I don't think so, why don't you Google my posts, there have too many to count, now go away.

43 posted on 02/24/2010 8:05:02 PM PST by fedupjohn ("Facts are stubborn things." Ron Reagan.......Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
Excuse me, you've been here since Nov 7, 2008, 2008 and your telling me to go somewhere, “

I don't care if I have been here since this afternoon, I can darn well tell you what I want, when you come up with stupid comments to me, like your did in your first post to me.
You have been at FR all this time, and you still don't seem to have learned any sense. You are like some idiot who has been in a university for 10 years, and still hasn't gotten a degree yet.
BTW, it's not “your”, it's “ you are”.

I don't think so, why don't you Google my posts, there have too many to count, now go away”

By all means...as long as you take a jump over a very steep cliff with rocks beneath first.

44 posted on 02/24/2010 8:31:23 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

I wish she would get Dana Perino. I thought she did good.


45 posted on 02/24/2010 8:34:55 PM PST by U.S. Army Retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
How can reporters reach Sarah Palin?

LOL.

Honestly, since she is of such little 'gravitas' why would they want to reach her?

Pity the lame stream media. They can start by calling Fox New Channel in NYC and beg pretty please to speak to Roger Ailes.

:)


46 posted on 02/24/2010 8:40:36 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

I wish she would get Dana Perino. I thought she did good.


47 posted on 02/24/2010 9:03:40 PM PST by U.S. Army Retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

LOL! Maybe Sarah doesn’t WANT to be reached by the reporters.


48 posted on 02/24/2010 9:41:11 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

She should hire Andrew Breitbart.


49 posted on 02/24/2010 9:54:12 PM PST by JApost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Palin needs a competent spokesperson for conservative groups. Meg Stapleton really screwed up with speaking engagements last year. Because of Stapleton’s reputation for incompetence, Bob McDonnell did not want Palin campaigning for him and instead opting for the more reliable Mitt Rommney. If Palin doesn’t find a competent sopkesperson soon, conservatives will treat Palin the same way Gov Bob McDonnell treated Palin.


50 posted on 02/25/2010 4:04:32 PM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson