Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CPAC Shills for Islamic Terrorists
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 2-25-10

Posted on 02/25/2010 4:13:55 AM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2010 4:13:55 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Good work, Ms. Geller.


2 posted on 02/25/2010 4:19:52 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Well, if CPAC going to invite GOPride, the John "Ikes a Commie" Birch Society, and elect Ron "the Fed financed Sadaam" Paul, I can see why they wouldn't allow Pam Geller and Robert Spencer in the door. And why people like Sarah Palin and Mark Levin refused to participate.

3 posted on 02/25/2010 4:20:02 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Place marker. Nigh they will come.


4 posted on 02/25/2010 4:25:46 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Sounds as though the Republican Party needs surgery: a Muslimectomy. Then massive infusions of Tea Party!


5 posted on 02/25/2010 4:39:24 AM PST by RoadTest (Wealth isn't obscene. Poverty is obscene. - Thomas (man of few but dynamite words) Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

My take-away from this is Ron Paul is an evil, disgusting enemy of the American People and the American Way of Life.


6 posted on 02/25/2010 4:42:41 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; Cindy; CondoleezzaProtege; onyx; JustPiper; MestaMachine; Moe Tzadik; Bob J
AuntB - do not miss this article!!

Cindy - Sorry to bother you, but did you hear that Bob Spencer was not welcome at CPAC????

7 posted on 02/25/2010 4:44:43 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie; Islaminaction

Norquist.
Liar.
Fraud.
Never to be trusted any where, anytime, least of all by Conservatives. islam is anathema to Conservatives yet he still manages to insinuate himself into positions at the forefront.

The Mt. Vernon signing:

February 17, 2010

Edwin Meese, former U.S. Attorney General under President Reagan

Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America

Edwin Feulner, Jr., president of the Heritage Foundation

Lee Edwards, Distinguished Fellow in Conservative Thought at the Heritage Foundation, was present at the Sharon Statement signing.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council

Becky Norton Dunlop, president of the Council for National Policy

Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center

Alfred Regnery, publisher of the American Spectator

David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union

David McIntosh, co-founder of the Federalist Society

T. Kenneth Cribb, former domestic policy adviser to President Reagan

Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform

William Wilson, President, Americans for Limited Government

Elaine Donnelly, Center for Military Readiness

Richard Viguerie, Chairman, ConservativeHQ.com

Kenneth Blackwell, Coalition for a Conservative Majority

Colin Hanna, President, Let Freedom Ring

Kathryn J. Lopez, National Review
**********************************

is a meaningless document with this traitor’s signature on it. If republicans don’t know by now what Norquist is, someone dang sure needs to inform them. And if they do know and welcome him anyway, all the more reason to burn that effing tent down!


8 posted on 02/25/2010 4:58:26 AM PST by MestaMachine (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426869/posts SUPPORT RINO FREE AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Probably too harsh, he’s simply a voice from the fringe.


9 posted on 02/25/2010 5:00:32 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

bookmark


10 posted on 02/25/2010 5:14:46 AM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

All the more reason to ignore CPAC as a viable conservative venue.


11 posted on 02/25/2010 5:14:52 AM PST by TADSLOS (Tea Party. We are the party of NO! NO to more government! NO to more spending! NO to more taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

That would appear to be the direction they’re moving.


12 posted on 02/25/2010 5:19:40 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
which coalesces with the left-wing’s new anti-Semitism against neoconservatives. Karen Kwiatkowski is a darling of both the leftist Huffington Post and the anti-Semitic paleocon site Antiwar.com.

The last refuge of a scoundrel these days is to scream "bigot" against an opponent. The conservative Al Sharptons are just as bad as the leftwing ones.

13 posted on 02/25/2010 5:24:00 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

My take away are the people who always screaming anti-semite and racist against opponents are evil and disgusting enemies of the American Way of Life. I am stick of the Al Sharptons, right or left.


14 posted on 02/25/2010 5:25:06 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Right, Pam Geller is an bigot, a scoundrel, un-American.


15 posted on 02/25/2010 5:27:21 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

CPAC can go to hell, first homosexuals there telling folks we should accept their agenda.
then we have the blame America , get rid of the young FBI,CIA, RP idiots.
Now I find out about this too.

CPAC has been infiltrated and maybe real conservatives who believe in conservatives values can set up a new conference and now one which is sold to the highest bidders for a table.

The left, the homosexuals, the American hating , western hating muslims have all got inside and it disgusts me especially when no one can speak up onstage and tell them what we stand for and why are you here


16 posted on 02/25/2010 6:02:17 AM PST by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: manc
“”Palin-bashing CPAC/ACU Chair donated $2,000 to Arlen Specter, endorsed Mitt Romney-care””

“”Exclusive: Conservative group offers support for $2M (Shame on Keene)”

“”Palin rebuffs CPAC, Keene””


“Washington Insider David Keene Disses Governor Palin, Claims to Speak for Grassroots
In the last three years CPAC has devolved into nothing more than
an annual love fest for … Mitt Romney. It should come as no surprise that David
Keene supported Mitt Romney-care in 2008. “


“David Keene Endorses Mitt Romney-care“

17 posted on 02/25/2010 6:07:29 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

thank you for that info, I’m reading through it right now.

I heard that the ron paul bots were there cheering and gong mad then the Romney bots came out and both did not agree with each other.

Now why is Ron Paul there anyway, he is no conservative but uses the GOP and this party for his own gain, He should stay in the party he is.
Then there is Romney , well don’t get me started on him

then there is the homosexuals and the ron paul bots in agreement with the homosexuals , then we have now muslims who hate this country and wants this country to be an islamic one?

AARRGGHH. None of them should have been there, it was bigger due to them lot being there when they should not have been


18 posted on 02/25/2010 6:28:03 AM PST by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Disturbing. CPAC is going to have to be held accountable for this or boycotted.


19 posted on 02/25/2010 6:30:13 AM PST by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

“Suhail Khan, a CPAC board member. According to Gaffney, Khan “has repeatedly been a featured speaker at MSA, ISNA and CAIR events” – that is, Muslim Students Association, Islamic Society of North America, and Council on American-Islamic Relations, three groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, the international Islamic organization dedicated to establishing the rule of Islamic law and the subjugation of infidels worldwide.”

Please clarify your response. Are you saying that Spencer, Geller, and Gaffney are “al sharptons” on the right? Or are you saying that Keene, Norquist, and Khan are “al sharptons?”
I find it difficult to believe that you would think Norquist and Khan are NOT anti-semitic considering their own histories.


20 posted on 02/25/2010 6:39:10 AM PST by MestaMachine (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426869/posts SUPPORT RINO FREE AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Hearing what went on at CPAC (GoPride shouting down a Speaker, Straw Poll for Ron Paul, etc), and now THIS....

Ugh.


21 posted on 02/25/2010 7:10:15 AM PST by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

So...how do we get these people out of the TP? Detected this on a dozen forums but didn’t know it was overt at CPAC.


22 posted on 02/25/2010 7:18:24 AM PST by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Sounds like CPAC should be replaced by TeaPAC, if there isn’t already such a thing.


23 posted on 02/25/2010 7:18:41 AM PST by manic4organic (Obama shot hoops, America lost troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

“Grover Norquist single-handedly ushered into America’s highest levels of government Islamic supremacist leaders, subversives, the Islamic fifth column. Grover gave them unparalleled access. Why didn’t Gaffney’s revelations, and those that preceded and followed his expose, end Norquist’s influence among conservatives? Why does he still have so much power?”

________

But, but...he has an ‘R’ beside his name, so everything is dandy fine! And he endorses John McCain!

Until the republicans clean out their ranks, we’ll get more of the same.

GRover will be the big push behind Amnesty, as he always is, regardless of what ‘we the people’ think.

A new poll today:(But then they didn’t poll Muslims, who are the only illegal aliens Grover cares about)
http://cis.org/Minority-Views-Immigration.

Minority Advocates, Constituents Differ on Immigration

Zogby Poll Finds Wide Support for Enforcement, Lower Numbers

WASHINGTON (February 25, 2010) – While it is sometimes assumed that minorities, particularly Hispanics, favor increased immigration and legalization for illegal immigrants, a new Zogby survey finds that minority voters’ views are more complex. The poll of Hispanic, Asian-American, and African-American likely voters finds some support for legalization. But overall each of these groups prefers enforcement and for illegal immigrants to return home. Moreover, significant majorities of all three groups think that the current level of immigration is too high. These views are in sharp contrast to the leaders of most ethnic advocacy organizations, who argue for increased immigration and legalization of illegal immigrants. The survey used neutral language, avoiding such terms as “amnesty,” “illegal alien,” or “undocumented.”

The findings:

In contrast to the leadership of many ethnic advocacy groups, most members of minority groups think immigration is too high.

* Hispanics: 56 percent said it is too high; 7 percent said too low; 14 percent just right.
* Asian-Americans: 57 percent said immigration is too high; 5 percent said too low; 18 percent just right.
* African-Americans: 68 percent said it is too high; 4 percent said too low; 14 percent just right.

Most members of minority groups do not feel that illegal immigration is caused by limits on legal immigration as many ethnic advocacy groups argue; instead, members feel it’s due to a lack of enforcement.

* Hispanics: Just 20 percent said illegal immigration was caused by not letting in enough legal immigrants; 61 percent said inadequate enforcement.
* Asian-Americans: 19 percent said not enough legal immigration; 69 percent said inadequate enforcement.
* African-Americans: 16 percent said not enough legal immigration; 70 percent said inadequate enforcement.

Most members of minority groups feel that there are plenty of Americans available to fill unskilled jobs.

* Hispanics: 15 percent said legal immigration should be increased to fill unskilled jobs; 65 percent said there are plenty of Americans available to do unskilled jobs, employers just need to pay more.
* Asian-Americans: 19 percent said increase immigration; 65 percent said plenty of Americans are available.
* African-Americans: 6 percent said increase immigration; 81 percent said plenty of Americans are available.

When asked to choose between enforcement that would cause illegal immigrants in the country to go home or offering them a pathway to citizenship with conditions, most members of minority groups choose enforcement.

* Hispanics: 52 percent support enforcement to encourage illegals to go home; 34 percent support conditional legalization.
* Asian-Americans: 57 percent support enforcement; 29 percent support conditional legalization.
* African-Americans: 50 percent support enforcement; 30 percent support conditional legalization.

Discussion
This survey of minority voters shows that when it comes to the issue of legalizing illegal immigrants, these voters disagree with the leadership of many ethnic advocacy groups. Most voters want the law enforced and illegal immigrants to return to their home countries. Overall they also feel that the current level of immigration is too high. The poll specifically asks voters to put aside the issue of legal status and focus only on the numbers. Even so, most think the level of immigration is too high and very few think it is too low. Not surprisingly, when it comes to allowing more unskilled workers into the country, most Hispanic, Asian-American, and African-American voters feel there are plenty of Americans here to do such work; employers just need to pay more.

The overall findings of this poll show a significant divide between the perception that minority voters want legalization and increased legal immigration and the reality, which is that they want enforcement and less immigration. Like most Americans, minority voters are not anti-immigrant or anti-immigration per se. Moreover there is not unanimity on the immigration issue among or between groups. What the poll does show is that, like most Americans, Hispanic, Asian, and black voters want the law enforced and illegal immigrants to go home. Moreover, they think the overall level of immigration is too high. When some leaders of minority groups speak on immigration and argue for legalization, they are merely offering their own personal opinions, not necessarily those of voters in these communities.


24 posted on 02/25/2010 8:08:02 AM PST by AuntB (WE are NOT a nation of immigrants! We're a nation of Americans! http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Why have such a misleading headline?

And then in her statement she says ‘The truth of the matter is that our event was at CPAC, but it was an independent event, not a CPAC event’


25 posted on 02/25/2010 8:32:17 AM PST by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

No, I haven’t read it.

Thanks for pinging me.


26 posted on 02/25/2010 8:49:26 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thank you for posting this.


27 posted on 02/25/2010 9:35:45 AM PST by Excellence (Meet your new mother-in-law, the United States Government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Yes, and I may have been the same restaurant with a Communist one time. This kind of guilt by association stuff is getting old.


28 posted on 02/25/2010 9:38:06 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

guilt by association

... so just stick your head back in the sand and ignore the FACT that al-Grover took the Hamas crowd INTO the White House!
That’s not only an association, there bubba...

but now go back to sleep, nothing to see here, move along...

ymmv


29 posted on 02/25/2010 10:03:49 AM PST by ElectionInspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It is actually worse. Norquist and Khan insinuate themselves in as many conservative groups as possible. I went to the urban conservative conference of the Harbour League and found that the useful idiot Jews running it had made Khan a board member.
30 posted on 02/25/2010 10:09:26 AM PST by rmlew (Democracy tends to ignore..., threats to its existence because it loathes doing what is needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Are you calling Geller or Kwiatkowski a bigot? Kwiatkowski has tried to deligitimize her opponents by calling them members of the Israel Lobby.


31 posted on 02/25/2010 10:32:03 AM PST by rmlew (Democracy tends to ignore..., threats to its existence because it loathes doing what is needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Huh....I’m not calling them bigots which is about the worst thing you can call someone. Calling someone a member of the Israel lobby (which really does exist and is quite public) is not the same thing. Using the anti-semite and racist words so liberally, as the author of this article does, only trivializes the,.


32 posted on 02/25/2010 10:43:22 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

WHY are these people called conservatives? False flag!


33 posted on 02/25/2010 11:37:36 AM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

“Grover Norquist single-handedly ushered into America’s highest levels of government Islamic supremacist leaders, subversives, the Islamic fifth column. Grover gave them unparalleled access. Why didn’t Gaffney’s revelations, and those that preceded and followed his expose, end Norquist’s influence among conservatives? Why does he still have so much power?”

________He had the trust, for some reason, of GEORGE BUSH.


34 posted on 02/25/2010 11:49:57 AM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

“Grover Norquist single-handedly ushered into America’s highest levels of government Islamic supremacist leaders, subversives, the Islamic fifth column. Grover gave them unparalleled access. Why didn’t Gaffney’s revelations, and those that preceded and followed his expose, end Norquist’s influence among conservatives? Why does he still have so much power?”

________He had the trust, for some reason, of GEORGE BUSH.”

_____________________

You can thank KARL ROVE for that. He brought Grover and Abramoff into the white house.


35 posted on 02/25/2010 11:55:17 AM PST by AuntB (WE are NOT a nation of immigrants! We're a nation of Americans! http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum; All

CLASSIC ARTICE you missed!

Grover Norquist: ‘Field Marshal’ of the Bush Plan

[snips]”I started out as a right-winger, and when I retire I want to be a squishy middle-of-the-roader,” he jokes, chortling at the thought. Grover Norquist

To a significant degree, George W. Bush owes his election to Norquist, whose early support was crucial in lining up the right behind the Texas governor’s campaign. And if Bush, born in the Ivy League haunts of the Eastern Establishment but raised in the conservative oilfields of West Texas, has managed to forge a governing coalition that includes both Big Business and the far right, Norquist’s skillful ability to hold that coalition together is a big reason why.

In November 1998, immediately after Bush was re-elected as Texas governor and began eyeing the White House, Norquist traveled to Austin to meet Bush and Karl Rove, Bush’s political guru, whom Norquist has known for two decades. Norquist came away convinced that Bush, if not an authentic conservative, was at least the right’s best hope.

Norquist, upon returning to Washington, started spreading the word that the right ought to line up behind Bush.

According to several sources, Norquist’s support was decisive in swinging the bulk of the conservative movement into Bush’s camp by early 1999. “It’s not disputable,” says Fund of the Wall Street Journal. Then, when Bush ran into trouble battling Senator John McCain of Arizona, Norquist mobilized the right against McCain in the early primaries, especially in South Carolina—and, in the process, cemented his ties to Bush and Rove.

When pressed, Norquist admits that he has no idea whether Bush is truly committed or just playing politics—and that, in the end, it doesn’t matter. “Is Bush, or Rove for that matter, a true believer?” he asks. “I don’t know.....”

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=karl+rove


36 posted on 02/25/2010 12:01:30 PM PST by AuntB (WE are NOT a nation of immigrants! We're a nation of Americans! http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I did not know this, but I have seen info on Norquist's muzzie involvment, including that he converted a few years ago. Axis of Evil allright. George Bush however, was not (is not) evil, just incredibly dumb. Both of these bast@rds care only about power and there are lots more out there like them. THX for the link Aunt B

What did we fight WWII for? And 'Nam? Not for these SOBs.

37 posted on 02/25/2010 12:51:45 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
I started thinking Rove was dirty way back in '03. Something akin to Nixon's Kissinger.

Yet Rove was so popular with republicans!

38 posted on 02/25/2010 4:19:17 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Ron Paul is an anti-Semite. Tried and true. He makes common cause with the Islamists, who are our enemy.


39 posted on 02/25/2010 4:46:39 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
I’m not calling them bigots which is about the worst thing you can call someone. Calling someone a member of the Israel lobby (which really does exist and is quite public) is not the same thing.
In most of Europe, it is. It is a way of silencing people. Worse, it questions their loyalty and patriotism.

Using the anti-semite and racist words so liberally, as the author of this article does, only trivializes the,.
Lay with dogs, wake up with fleas. Raimondo is a deranged hater of Israel along with Paul Craig Roberts and many others on Antiwar.com. Kwiatkowski likes to question the loyalty of her opponents, a common antisemitic trope. Res Ipsa Loqator.

Norquist and Khan support Islamist infiltration, support Islamic conquest by migration and conversion (Dawa), oppose actions to prevent nuclear proliferation in the region. The effects, even if I am charitable enough to believe them unintended, are to endanger the lives of all Israelis, and if you look at what happens in Europe, of all American Jews and eventually gentiles too.

40 posted on 02/25/2010 10:03:07 PM PST by rmlew (Democracy tends to ignore..., threats to its existence because it loathes doing what is needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Thanks SJackson.
41 posted on 02/26/2010 6:39:25 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Well, if CPAC going to invite GOPride, the John "Ikes a Commie" Birch Society, and elect Ron "the Fed financed Sadaam" Paul, I can see why they wouldn't allow Pam Geller and Robert Spencer in the door. And why people like Sarah Palin and Mark Levin refused to participate.

Yes, it appears that the left pulled off a pretty successful infiltration. I'm glad to see that Sarah Palin and Mark Levin stayed away. Disappointed that Mike Pence got mixed up in that crowd.

42 posted on 02/26/2010 11:43:40 PM PST by Allegra (It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
“You’ve Been Lied To: Why Real Conservatives are Against the War on Terror Delaware Ballroom
Sponsored by Campaign for Liberty (60 minutes)
Speakers: Retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Karen Kwiatkowski and Jacob Hornberger, President of FFF
Open to All CPAC Attendees”

The message there was that “real conservatives” don’t support the war on terror because it is a creation of the “Israeli lobby” — which coalesces with the left-wing’s new anti-Semitism against neoconservatives. Karen Kwiatkowski is a darling of both the leftist Huffington Post and the anti-Semitic paleocon site Antiwar.com.

CPAC has become a MoonbatFest.

43 posted on 02/26/2010 11:50:26 PM PST by Allegra (It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Agreed. Norquist and his PLO whore of a wife need to be excommunicated, pronto!


44 posted on 02/28/2010 5:19:22 AM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

So Norquist gave us Bush. Even more reason to hate the guy.


45 posted on 02/28/2010 5:24:04 AM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Yes, it appears that the left pulled off a pretty successful infiltration. I'm glad to see that Sarah Palin and Mark Levin stayed away. Disappointed that Mike Pence got mixed up in that crowd.

Don't know how much of this was known up front, though Levin obviously knew, and dropped out over the Birchers. Palin knew something, and made a solid decision. I'm nothing to them, but for me their credibility has suffered.

Next year they'll have a Code Pink booth.

comments. Ron Paul Endorses Adam Kokesh for Congress (Code Pinko Barf Alert)

46 posted on 02/28/2010 8:12:45 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

Love to see a photo of Norquist coming out of a mosque.


47 posted on 03/05/2010 4:15:00 PM PST by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Perfect! Wait—Norquist probably covers his face with one of his wife’s extra veils! Maybe wears a burka too. LMAO


48 posted on 03/05/2010 4:26:27 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: molybdenum

No seriously, inquiring minds want to know. Somebody whould really follow this guy around on a Friday.


49 posted on 03/05/2010 6:17:54 PM PST by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
I'd like to know how he continues to pose as a conservative and get people to go to the CPAC conventions, donate to it, and then further the impression that he is just some harmless rich investor interested in conservative doings. It's sickening. Keene is another one. Warren Buffett is responsible for promoting Arnold S for governor in CA....these people just buy everyone they need and/or blackmail them!

You'd have to have a lot of time and learn his habits and where he goes (such as the mosque)& who he meets with, etc. and you couldn't be observed too near to him, too often (am speculating).

50 posted on 03/05/2010 7:36:25 PM PST by molybdenum ((A nation without borders is not a nation......Ronald Reagan.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson