Posted on 02/25/2010 7:44:15 AM PST by capacommie
And yet... there have been what? 100 such cases that got court dates?
And what is there to show for it?
Tough!
And what is there to show for it?
Oh, well, now that you put it that way...let's all just go prone on the issue. I mean, nobody in government would ever lie to us. Would they?
/s
Do you think that Article II of the Constitution should be enforced????
Based on that track record, you've been "prone on the issue" for almost 2 years.
------------------
lol. yeah, sure. Have another glass of kool-aid there buddy.
Treason.. penalty is much better.
Maybe we could have a group plan because most of congress are traitors.
Do you think that Article II of the Constitution should be enforced????
Sure...By the process provided for in the aforementioned Constitution:
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, ...the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President...
A process where the political winners and losers are not a foregone conclusion.
According to that line of thought, neither was Chester Arthur the 21st president.
Should 0bamao be found ineligible to be president, it would spell the end of the modern Democrat Party. ALL Democrats are tied to 0bamao and would be tainted beyond redemption for engaging in willful fraud.
I doubt that 0bamao would be found “ineligible”, however. Powerful forces would prevent that as it would lay waste to their agendas of maintaining control of the country.
According to that line of thought, neither was Chester Arthur the 21st president.
------------------------
Correct. He usurped the office. Funny how some folks at the time, who questioned his eligibility, focused on his place of birth instead of focusing on the fact that his father was a foreign national at the time of C.A.'s birth. Only, his usurping the office wasn't confirmed until just recently. Oh, and it's rather interesting that C.A. ordered most of his papers burned upon his death.
Why can’t both things be pursued? Things are not going well for Obama now and things will probably get worse for him. That is good. He is incompetent and dangerous.
I don’t understand why this elligibilty issue is a dead horse. No matter how inconvenient it may prove to be, no matter the turmoil that would result from his removal, America needs to know how our system has been threatened by this man and by the Democrats who worked to get him in office. I have no doubt that they knew about the issue.
In my view, a public examination of what this president, who has made it clear that he is critical of the Constitution of the U.S., has done to our system of government is absolutely necassary. It should never happen again. Anyone who was aware of this man’s ineligibility should be incarcerated.
Yes, it would be messy. Yes, I do believe that he is not a natural born citizen, and I base my remarks on that belief. I don’t care what anybody says, this guy has too many secrets about his past. Too many records are unavailable. There has to be a reason for this. The American people need to know everything there is to know about the man who is our president and how he became our president.
The survival of America depends on understanding this kind of assault on our Republic. It can be fatal if we do not understand how this has happened.
Trolls crave attention. Ignore them. Especially those who continually insist on posting in duplicate.
As would Biden and the rest of them. It's a house of cards. One falls and the rest will follow suit. Even down to the state officials who certified him to be placed on the ballots. But at least Hussein, Biden, and Nancy will be shown the door in the first sweep.
Amen
…Arthur even refrains from making comments on English home affairs–the Irish rebellion, for instance, which is agitating millions of American citizens, who are also born Irishmen like the President.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/04/chester-a-arthur-rest-in-peace/
Question: If Arthur's eligibility was questioned at the time, why wasn't the Constitutional meaning of Natural Born Citizen defined by law then?
There is no reason we can’t do ALL of it.
Watch your tone noob.
You may have a valid point but your manners belong on DU, NOT here.
The point, is that he never qualified to be President, so your not removing a President, your removing someone found not to be qualified to be president in the first place. You cannot call someone who unqualified to be president...President. He is a usurper, a fraud, a criminal.
OK...that makes sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.