Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation...
Youtube ^ | Feb 28th, 2010

Posted on 03/01/2010 12:43:15 PM PST by TaraP

Next are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill "Microsoft" Gates.

At the heart of Gates' address lies the central Global Warming dogma, which dictates that Co2 emitted by human beings are the primary culprit for the unwanted heating of the globe.

Since this artificial alleged human-induced heating effect allegedly stands to devastate the planet if left unabated, Global Warming dogma proponents therefore argue that human Co2 emissions must be drastically reduced. As Gates casually addresses the issue, he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

He postulates the central equation, giving an estimation of the humanly emitted C02 load per year, to be:

Co2 = P times S times E times C

Where P stands for the population number, S the average number of services per person, E the average amount of energy units per service, and C the average Co2 emitted load per unit of service, per year; Co2 stands for the projected total humanly emitted carbon-dioxide load by the entire population per year.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billgates; gates; philanthropy; populationcontrol; tinfoil; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2010 12:43:15 PM PST by TaraP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Gates knows less about global warming than he knew about computer operating systems. (And he was at the Obamaloon level about computers.....sleazy businessman, but totally stupid about technology.)


2 posted on 03/01/2010 12:44:42 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
As soon as the Gates family and all these alarmists start killing themselves for the safety and preservation of the world, then some others may think about it. Congress should be the next after the Gates family to set the example. The Great leader of America Obama and his family can start the ball rolling tomorrow.
3 posted on 03/01/2010 12:47:35 PM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Another billion dollar marxist who wants to run the world.


4 posted on 03/01/2010 12:48:41 PM PST by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Loony tunes.

Vaccinations decrease mortality and have, among other things, eliminated smallpox as a human disease.

5 posted on 03/01/2010 12:50:59 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Yep. Evil.


6 posted on 03/01/2010 12:51:30 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
I didn't get that from listening.

Gates did make a comment that there were 6.x billion people and that was going up to 9.x billion by year xxxx. And if we did a really good job with vaccines, health services and reproductive services that might be reduced by 10-15%.

It's not clear at all why he thinks vaccines would help reduce population growth, but it could be linked to his mentioned desire to lift people out of poverty rather than a sinister plan to kill people or render them infertile through vaccines.

7 posted on 03/01/2010 12:53:02 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Not that kind of vaccine.....more like the injections deer get to reduce population....inducing sterility.

Of course, there will be no serious side effects; meaning that anyone who can obtain a license to reproduce will be in no danger of having complications.... /s


8 posted on 03/01/2010 12:53:41 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
I'd like to know how much CO2 I have emitted cursing
Microsoft malfunctions.
9 posted on 03/01/2010 12:54:07 PM PST by CrazyIvan (What's "My Struggle" in Kenyan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Who of these enviro’s will be the first to sacrifice their first born to Gaia? Oh, it is to be me and mine to sacrifice as we are expendable. This goes over real well near the rice fields in Ban San Sai.


10 posted on 03/01/2010 12:54:43 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

This was the plot of Rainbow Six by Tom Clancy. A billionaire environmental whacko developed a virus called Shiva and exposed people at the Olympics to it so they would spread it world wide. When panic sets in, his pharmaceutical company would announce the vaccine, which was in reality the disease itself. The chosen would live in a Biosphere until the virus ran its course.


11 posted on 03/01/2010 12:55:14 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

vaccines are one of the greatest things EVER invented.


12 posted on 03/01/2010 12:56:37 PM PST by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

It was bizarre thing to say in context. A slip?


13 posted on 03/01/2010 12:57:52 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
It's not clear at all why he thinks vaccines would help reduce population growth

Reductions in child mortality rates can lead to parents having less children overall (as they know that the per-child odds of their children making it to adulthood have substantially increased).

That's not said to offer any endorsement of the anti-human mythology of the Warmists. Just a statistical observation.

14 posted on 03/01/2010 12:58:00 PM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Then the title should be “Gates advocates use of sterility drug”. “Admits Vaccines are used” means that the vaccines ARE used to for human depopulation, and he admitted such. He did no such thing and no such thing is actually occurring. Vaccination is not the proper term for a birth control measure anyway.

Sometimes it gets difficult to separate the ‘loony’ from the ‘tune’ around here.

15 posted on 03/01/2010 12:58:04 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Gates confused me.In first clip he said the population will go up to 9billion
Then he says with great vaccines health care etc he could lower the population by 10% or 15%.

is he really advocating using vaccines to kill people?


16 posted on 03/01/2010 12:58:19 PM PST by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA; RWGinger

See my #14. May help explain things.


17 posted on 03/01/2010 12:59:43 PM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
It's not clear at all why he thinks vaccines would help reduce population growth,

I haven't watched the video yet, but the reason may be to convice third world parents that they don't need to have a dozen kids to almost guarantee that two or three will survive to adulthood. However the average family will have more than a couple surviving kids, thus increasing the population. Get good medical care including vaccinations and if you have three kids likely all three will grow to adults, so you no long need to have a dozen.

18 posted on 03/01/2010 1:00:02 PM PST by KarlInOhio (New Olympic tagline Shut up, Bob Costas. Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DManA
"It was bizarre thing to say in context. A slip?"

I don't think so. They are misreading it. His point was that population was going to rise and at best that growth could be reduced by 10-15%. He sounded like it was unavoidable.

It didn't sound like he was advocating vaccines for a nefarious purpose, because you could get a lot more than a 10-15% reduction in growth if that was your aim.

I'm sure if we watched the entire speech that his conclusion would be that the easiest part of the equation to change is the carbon footprint of the energy produced.

19 posted on 03/01/2010 1:02:41 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

He wouldn’t be the first....

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_2757.shtml


20 posted on 03/01/2010 1:05:51 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Are New Vaccines
Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?

During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite’ Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country’s anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite’ obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.

hCG and Anti-hCG Antibodies

In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman’s body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.

However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.(1)

HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.(2) Soon additional reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in 1993.

The Known Facts

Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:

* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren’t men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?

* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there — in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been “contaminated.”

* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)

* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier — the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)

The Anti-Fertility Gang

Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State.(5) The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.(6)

The WHO begain its “Special Programme” in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356 million on “reproductive health” research.(7) It is this “Programme” which has pioneered the development of the abortificant vaccine. Over $90 million of this Programme’s funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than $52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million , $27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed “only” $5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of $2.5 million. Other major contibutors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand.

WHO and Philippine Health Department Excuses

When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence coming from “right-to-life and Catholic” sources. Four new vials of the tetanus vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke’s (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila — and all four vials tested positive for hCG!

From outright denial the stories now shifted to the allegedly “insignificant” quantity of the hCG present; the volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies.

But new tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of women vaccinated with the tetauns toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, twenty-six tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only “insignificant” quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring anti-hCG antibodies? The WHO and the DOH had no answers.

New arguments surfaced: hCG’s apparent presence in the vaccine was due to “false positives” resulting from the particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG. And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing process.

But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies!

Why A Tetanus Toxoid “Carrier”?

Because the human body does not attack its own naturally occurring hormone hCG, the body has to be fooled into treating hCG as an invading enemy in order to develop a successful anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG antibodies. A paper delivered at the 4th International Congress of Reproductive Immunology (Kiel, West Germany, 26-29 July 1989) spelled it out: “Linkage to a carrier was done to overcome the immunological tolerance to hCG.”(8)

Vaccine Untested by Drug Bureau

After the vaccine controversy had reached a fever pitch, a new bombshell exploded; none of the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used had ever been licensed for sale and distribution or registered with the Philippine Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), as required by law. The head of the BFAD lamely explained that the companies distributing these brands “did not apply for registration.”(9) The companies in question are Connaught Laboratories Ltd. and Intervex, both from Canada, and CSL Laboratories from Australia.

It seemed that the BFAD might belatedly require re-testing, but the idea was quickly rejected when the Secretary of Health declared that, since the vaccines had been certified by the WHO — there they are again! — there was assurance enough that the “vaccines come from reputable manufacturers.”(10)

Just how “reputable” one of the manufacturers might be is open to some question. In the mid-`80s Connaught Laboratories was found to be knowingly distributing vials of AIDS-contaminated blood products.(11)

Epilogue

At this juncture, evidence is beginning to appear from Africa.(12) HLI has called for a Congressional investigation of the situation, inasmuch as nearly every agency involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine is funded, at least in part, with U.S. monies.


NOTES:
(1) “Abortifacient vaccines loom as new threat,” HLI Reports, November 1993, pp. 1-2.

(2) World Council Reports, 28 November 1994, pp. 4-5.

(3) A call placed by this writer on 5 May 1995 to the Montgomery County (Maryland) Health Department, Epidemology Division — Infectious Diseases — Adult Immunizations, elicited the following information:

Q. For how long a time does the tetanus vaccination offer protection?
A. 10 years.
Q. Have you ever heard of any adult requiring three tetanus vaccinations within a 3 or 4 month time period, and a total of 5 vaccinations in all within a year or so?
A. Whaaaat! Never. No way!
Reports from the Philippines appear to confirm the 10-year immunity afforded by tetanus toxoid vaccinations: prior to the campaigns begun in 1993, the so-called booster shots were given only every 10 years.
(4) More than a score of articles, many written by WHO researchers, document WHO’s attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as a carrier. Some leading articles include:

“Clinical profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,” Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268.
“Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335.

“Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine,” The Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298. “Vaccines for Fertility Regulation,” Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction, Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988).

“Anti-hCG Vaccines are in Clinical Trials,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 123-126.

(5) These institutional names are garnered from the journal articles cited in the previous footnote.
(6) Lancet, 11 June 1988, p. 1296.

(7) Challenges in Reproductive Health Research, Biennial Report 1992-1993, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1994, p. 186.

(8) G.P. Talwar, et al, “Prospects of an anti-hCG vaccine inducing antibodies of high affinity...(etc),” Reproductive Technology 1989, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1990, Amsterdam, New York, p. 231.

(9) “3 DOH vaccines untested by BFAD,” The Philippine Star, 4 April 1995, pp. 1, 12.

(10) “BFAD junks re-testing of controversial shot,” Manila Standard, 7 April 1995; “DOH: Toxoid vaccines are safe,” The Philippine Star, 7 April 1995.

(11) “Ottawa got blood tainted by HIV.” Ottawa Citizen, 4 April 1995.

(12) A nearly two-year old communique from Tanzania tells a familiar story: tetanus toxoid vaccinations, five in all, given only to women aged 15-45. Nigeria, too, may have been victimized; see The Lancet, 4 June 1988, p. 1273.

Credit: Copyright June/July 1995 by James A. Miller, special correspondent for Human Life International. This article was originally published in HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June/July 1995, Volume 13, Number 8. Permission to reprint granted to Thinktwice/New Atlantean Press.


21 posted on 03/01/2010 1:06:09 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Yes, I think I’d give Gates the benefit of any doubt here. This man puts his money where his mouth is and looks for relatively easy, cost effective ways that save more lives than non-effective, expensive strategies. He’s very effective. I’ve read that the WHO doesn’t like him because they can’t control him and how medical dollars are spent around the world. IMHO, he shows them up big time. I believe that his wife runs the foundation.


22 posted on 03/01/2010 1:08:26 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist

I read this and laughed “Reductions in child mortality rates can lead to parents having less children overall (as they know that the per-child odds of their children making it to adulthood have substantially increased).”

Do you actually think people having numerous kids in third world countries are trying to have more kids they already can’t feed in case some of them strave to death?

They have kids because they do not have access to birth control or even understand it. These people don’t have large acres of land on which they grow food and therefore need labor. This isn’t the 1800’s

I HOPE though that Gates is referring to a birth control vaccine, not a euthanasia drug


23 posted on 03/01/2010 1:08:35 PM PST by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TaraP; All

That is such a misrepresentation of what he said.

Look I am neither a Gates fan nor a supporter of the bad science known as AGW (or ACC if you prefer) but to deliberating misinterpret someone’s remarks and pretend that they say something that is not said is as bad as the ‘progressives’ in the White House.

Nancy Pelosi would be proud of you


24 posted on 03/01/2010 1:11:35 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=CullTheHerd

“A little research reveals that the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), of which Stephen Lewis is a director, was launched by none other than the Rockefeller Foundation and heavily funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has provided over $150 million dollars so far”

“Billionaire William H. Gates III and his father William H. Gates II, director of the Gates Foundation, have been supporters of eugenics and population control programs for decades. This includes the promotion of homosexuality, which successfully shortens the lifespan of adults and reduces their rate of reproduction.”


25 posted on 03/01/2010 1:11:42 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

File under ‘a big truth that no one can believe’

It’s pretty simple. He’s talking about population reduction, and alludes to vaccines being used. Spin it away if it makes you feel better.


26 posted on 03/01/2010 1:16:49 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Thanks!

Gates is a *Liberal Progressive*

I think we all know what his intentions are...


27 posted on 03/01/2010 1:17:33 PM PST by TaraP (*GOD* made love so strong, so it would carry you all the way home.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
And this massive conspiracy to allegedly try an untested sterility “vaccine” has had what effect upon the population growth rate of Mexico and the Philippines?

Population is still growing like gangbusters in Mexico and the Philippines.

So a diabolical and sinister conspiracy to accomplish.... absolutely nothing.

“Th-tha-th-th-tha-th-th-that's all folks”

28 posted on 03/01/2010 1:18:31 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

Gates also is an admitted Atheist...

A *Liberal Progressive Atheist*


29 posted on 03/01/2010 1:20:22 PM PST by TaraP (*GOD* made love so strong, so it would carry you all the way home.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Disregard the minutia of the article. Just pointing out that it's an old idea gaining new popularity among the planners. Every person in that audience, I'm rather sure, knew exactly what he meant. You're out of the loop, I think. MHO
30 posted on 03/01/2010 1:22:00 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

I provided a link to back up/confirm your assertion. No spin necessary.


31 posted on 03/01/2010 1:22:43 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Ping!


32 posted on 03/01/2010 1:24:48 PM PST by Politicalmom (Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: the long march

See post #25. There’s no misrepresentation.


33 posted on 03/01/2010 1:25:16 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
It's not clear at all why he thinks vaccines would help reduce population growth, but it could be linked to his mentioned desire to lift people out of poverty rather than a sinister plan to kill people or render them infertile through vaccines.

Yeah, this seems pretty obvious to me. He clearly states that the Earth's current population is 6.8 billion and will peak around 9 billion (a projection I've seen elsewhere). He then states that this peak number can be reduced by providing better health and reproductive services - in other words, contraceptives, sex education and a better standard of living.

There is no shortage of enviro-cultists who'd love to see an Earth with no people on it, but trying to equate Gates with these people on the basis of this video clip or coming up with paranoid theories that he would like to commit genocide via vaccination is beyond ridiculous. Gates, through his foundation, is doing more to keep people alive than most nations are these days.


34 posted on 03/01/2010 1:26:46 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DManA
It was bizarre thing to say in context. A slip?

No, it is all about context.

The context in which the speech is given, as in who the speech is given to.

Just think of it as when Obama was speaking to the SCIU and admitted that his ultimate goal was a single payer health plan.

When you know you are with a sympathetic audience you do not worry about revealing that you hold an opinion that would be abhorrent to the general populace.

35 posted on 03/01/2010 1:26:48 PM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
“the planners”?

You mean the super secret cabal that actually runs the world?

LOL!

Nobody is in control, nobody CAN be in control. The more secret an organization is the less power it can actually have.

36 posted on 03/01/2010 1:28:11 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

There was a meeting of the billionaires here while back. Don’t remember all the names, they decided the number on problem they were going to work on was over population of the planet.


37 posted on 03/01/2010 1:29:21 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Another reason not to buy Microsoft products.


38 posted on 03/01/2010 1:29:56 PM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger
I read this and laughed “Reductions in child mortality rates can lead to parents having less children overall (as they know that the per-child odds of their children making it to adulthood have substantially increased).” Do you actually think people having numerous kids in third world countries are trying to have more kids they already can’t feed in case some of them strave to death?

Absolutely.

The percentage of children making it to adulthood is a very powerful driver of reduced population growth rates. There's good self-interested reasons why this is so.

See, parents in the poor countries depend on having a number of children make it to adulthood, in order for those children to then support their parents in their old age. The higher the percentage who die in the childhood years, the more children parents must have in order to ensure that some actually make it to adulthood.

If child mortality rates are 50%, a couple might have a dozen children in the hopes that at least some will survive. And, with a 50% child mortality rate, on average 6 of them will survive -- albeit only 3 in some families, while 9 in others, etc.

Now, if the child mortality rate in only 1%, a couple might only have 3 kids, safe in the knowledge that the odds are very high that all 3 will make it to adulthood.

That's the way it works. God read up on demographics -- reduced child mortality rates almost always precede reduced numbers of children per family, and therefore reduced population growth. (With individual exceptions to the rule, here and there; some families just want 18 kids).

39 posted on 03/01/2010 1:31:13 PM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Yeah...I realized you might think I was talking about you as if you were opposing...unintended...solly. I meant the ‘collective you’: ones who can't grok the thing, and disbelieve, based upon enormity and, perhaps, horror at the possible truth Gates matter-of-factly presented.

Wouldn't be the first time real bad things are considered too beastly to be real...the Holocaust comes to mind...Pearl Harbor....Tuskegee....sterilization of blacks in the 50’s and 60’s...etc etc.

40 posted on 03/01/2010 1:31:39 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist
God read up on demographics

That is to say, GO read up on demographics.

41 posted on 03/01/2010 1:32:36 PM PST by Christian_Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Co2 = P times S times E times C

Gads what a brilliant mind. Equation leaves out the amount of CO2 produced as a product of basic human metabolism. There should be a number even if SxExC=0.

42 posted on 03/01/2010 1:33:21 PM PST by Mike Darancette (You know Obama is in trouble when the MSM mentions that he is half white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Oh indeed it is. And it is this kind of nonsense that leads others to think we are all wing nuts


43 posted on 03/01/2010 1:34:35 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

“the planners”?
“You mean the super secret cabal that actually runs the world?

LOL!

Nobody is in control, nobody CAN be in control. The more secret an organization is the less power it can actually have. “

It’s no secret, this initiative. And it’s not new. It is freely discussed among the ‘planning class’. If you don’t know what that is, oh well.

Your mock is sad.


44 posted on 03/01/2010 1:39:22 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Your view of the world is sad and deluded.

“the planners”!!! LOL!!!

Did they induct Gates into the secret society at birth or upon his first billion? How does a nobody like him become one of the “planners” if everything is so well “planned”?

Conspiracies within conspiracies to explain the conspiracies.

The truth is this....and well the Vikings of old knew it. “If you wish for something to be secret, tell one and not one other; for if three know a thing- thousands will.”

45 posted on 03/01/2010 1:42:50 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

So you doubt the *New World Order* exists?


46 posted on 03/01/2010 1:45:21 PM PST by TaraP (*GOD* made love so strong, so it would carry you all the way home.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
That African AIDS initiative was a whopper.

The Progressives have always been about population control. Even if just for the dissidents.

47 posted on 03/01/2010 1:46:58 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
WRONG

Not what he said, at least not what you want us to think that he said.

It would be a shame for FR to turn into the DU of the Obama administration.

48 posted on 03/01/2010 1:47:57 PM PST by Paradox (The Party of Know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

So, what do you think of, say, Al Gore? Is he real? Is he a planner? Do you know what you’re talking about? Can you be so blind?


49 posted on 03/01/2010 1:49:32 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

In northern Nigeria the Imams have said that the polio vaccine is a conspiracy to kill them, so nobody gets the shot. Sad to see the thousands and thousands of kids (and adults) crawling around because their legs are wasted away and no wheel chairs, etc.


50 posted on 03/01/2010 1:50:19 PM PST by 21twelve (Having the Democrats in control is like a never-ending game of Calvin ball. (Giotto))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson