Skip to comments.Humans must be to blame for climate change, say scientists (No other way around it)
Posted on 03/06/2010 7:46:23 AM PST by Libloather
Link only - Humans must be to blame for climate change, say scientists
At least the goofball admits the sun warms something! (Sheesh! It's like pullin' teeth with the Kool-aid drinkers.)
You mean the ones on the payroll of Al Gore’s shadow enterprises?
The scientists must give up %80 of their wealth in order to help pay for globull smarming...no way around it.
Humans are the only entity capable of financing AlGore and his snake oil scheme.
And who is to blame for all of Earth’s climate changes going back to Pangeia and the first ice age?
No, it wasn’t George Bush.
They should be celebrating since GW is over. The earth is cooling according to Prof Jones the Grand Poobah of Climate Change.
Pray for America’s Freedom
How about . . . Global Warmists are to blame for global warming. Why not? It has about the same level of scientific credibility.
The humans who lied and fabricated research to push their fraud are responsible for the lie of man made global warming. And they should be prosecuted.
So tell me how humans caused the warming 12,000 years ago that melted the mile of ice that used to cover what is now Central Park.
Somebody needs to inform these characters that it’s aready been determined that the waming pattern in the atmosphere does NOT conform to that predicted by computer models:
“Meanwhile, four climate scientists have dealt another blow to the anthropogenic global warming theory in the December issue of the International Journal of Climatology. They did an exhaustive comparison of observed atmospheric temperatures at various altitudes and compared the data against the predictions of global warming models. The abstract of the article states tersely:
We examine tropospheric temperature trends of 67 runs from 22 Climate of the 20th Century model simulations and try to reconcile them with the best available updated observations (in the tropics during the satellite era). Model results and observed temperature trends are in disagreement in most of the tropical troposphere, being separated by more than twice the uncertainty of the model mean. In layers near 5 km, the modelled trend is 100 to 300% higher than observed, and, above 8 km, modelled and observed trends have opposite signs. These conclusions contrast strongly with those of recent publications based on essentially the same data.
Lead author David Douglass elaborates:
The observed pattern of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming.
Abstract from International Journal of Climatology:
‘Humans must be to blame for climate change, say scientists (No other way around it)’
Depopulation is a must in order to save mother earth and since we(the left) are all knowing and important, we(the left) will choose who receives mandatory abortions, food rations and those who should except ‘death with dignity’ in the name of the common good.
First, I would want to see, examine, and validate the data, methodology, and assumptions that were used to determine that we had "significant" warming over the past half century. Was the warming coincident with the melting of the polar ice cap on Mars? Was the warming really significant? These are questionable assertions. This is a crucial assertion and typical of the "warmers."
Perhaps this article is the first salvo on their planned media blitz of warming propaganda.
Downplaying the role of the Sun is typical of the warmers who are paid $Billions to "prove" AGW.
Get rid of all humans, starting with sciencests.
We may have to accept death, except those who are progressively liberal enough