Posted on 03/09/2010 11:35:08 AM PST by raptor22
This starts off as an intellectual discourse on the use of apostates in political arguments, but descends to a pity party on Glenn Becks part when he goes after Michelle Malkin for criticizing his decision to give an hour to Eric Massa. It starts downhill at the moment that Beck says, I dont understand you people, which takes the Boss Emeritus aback. (snip) One can believe that the Obama administration is playing hardball with or without Massas testimony on this point, but relying on Massa undermines the argument if it turns out that Massa may be exaggerating or prevaricating for his own purposes and as Michelle has pointed out, theres certainly some evidence to bolster that interpretation. None of us need to rely on Massas credibility for our arguments. We can note his statements and consider the context and Massas motivations, which is all Michelle asks of Beck in reconsidering his choice to give Massa a big megaphone tonight. Its not bad advice, and perhaps Beck should give it more consideration, coming from a friend.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Listen to the conversation.
HOORAY Glenn Beck!
(get off the phone Michelle...SHEESH...first time I recall disagreeing with MM)
I’ve never listened to Beck more than five minutes. He’s not my cup of tea.
The only person I have always enjoyed listening to is Rush Limbaugh. That is someone who stays consistently on message without ranting around looking like a fool.
How does he do the same thing?
I agree that Glenn Beck may be walking a fine line with having Massa on, but I guess we’ll see what happens on the hour if he shows up. Shouldn’t take much to determine his credibility or not - and I think Beck can determine that.
someone got to Glenn. He’s recently taken on a much harsher stance and is starting to appease the weasels like Orielly.
I’ve listened to him since 2003. That may come to an end now.
Beck makes outragous accusations against Conservatives. Liking conservs to Fascist. He is the typical mental midget that reads a few books and suddenly considers himself an authority on everything. WRONGO Bub.
After the conversation Beck decided he needed to apologize to Michelle. That is when he wallowed in self pity. I used to think Beck was a clown. Now I realize he is actually a pompous jerk.
A cat fight between those whose feel free to mock those like us who insist Natural Law terms in the Constitution such as ‘natural born citizen’ mean something.
I like Beck, but catch myself liking Levin more. Levin thinks Beck is a opportunist dimbulb. Beck is sane 90% of the time and on this one he was right also. Let’s hear what Massa has to say, let’s use him to further convince the drones out of their stupor. Beck brings a whole new demographic to the cause, younger than 40 and doesn’t listen to AM radio.
Listen to this tape...They’re both pretty argumentative in ..lots of hot tempers around these days- including mine!
YOU PEOPLE!!!!!
Glenn is right here.
That’s not true. He’s been likening big government Republicans (RINOs) to fascists, not conservatives.
He later apologized to Michelle on air.....no big deal here!
I like them both and am not gonna stop watchin, readin or listening to either of them!!!
‘Who cares’ if Beck has MASSA on?
Let MASSA rant all he wants about Rahm and his escapades, extortions/contortions, and all his ballet moves. The more RAT laundry seeing the light of day the better we’re all for it.
FYI.. Glenn has been a friends with O’Reilly from the begining.. Glenn hasn’t been appeasing anyone.. He stands by friends reguardless of their differences.
That’s interesting, because I used to like both Levin and Beck. Then, I found Mark Levin unable to complete a single show without going on a childish (and substance free) rant about Glenn Beck and stopped listening to him. It’s unfortunate, because I have great respect for Levin’s mind.
One day that boy’s cheese is going to slip all the way off the cracker.
I think MM is pissed because Beck is giving Massa a lot of free time when his position on the HC bill is that it doesn’t go far enough i.e. no public option. I think Beck sees the guy as an interesting guest who is willing to speak out of school and throw some mud at the Obamanation.
Michelle is an ideologue, Beck is more of an entertainer, and therein lies the conflict.
Michelle got owned by Glenn Beck. Game, set, and match.
Rush doesn’t rant? You can’t be serious. Sarcasm, right?
Very true. That's the reason I am not a big Glenn Beck fan. He puts the Democrats and Republicans on equal planes too often, which is classic scorched-earth Libertarianism. BUT if there is an ounce of truth in Massas story, and I have no reason yet to doubt him yet, then let Beck do what he does best.
Malkin, God love her, has her own reputation of getting the Left and even some on the Right all wee-weed up with her style of investigative journalism, so I cannot comprehend why she is so against Beck doing the same.
Then Michelle Malkin admits that she will be tuning into Glenn’s show this afternoon, after saying what a waste of time it would be for Massa to be on the show!
Beck is indeed a pompous jerk. Did you hear the “Freudian slip” of calling MM Michele 0bama? Maybe it takes one to know one so Beck can easily spot a narcissist like 0bama.
I’m sick of Beck saying that there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans.
What’s the matter Beck? Not taking your Antabuse?
You don’t watch the show, do you?
They are not even in the same universe when it comes to
reasoning ability and knowledge.
Agree - plus I’m getting sick of Sean H. repeating that Reagan CPAC speech over and over and over. No pastels. We get that already. Rush is the only one that keeps his show fresh for the most part.
I first noticed the nastiness when he refers to truthers. All he had to say is he doesn’t support it but he goes out of his way to insult anyone who thinks proof of citizenship is a requirement.
That's what's been pissing me off about him lately.
When he brings new information to the table and does the investigative research stuff, he's absolutely second to none. When he starts believing he can tell other conservatives what to think, he becomes an insufferable douche-nozzle.
Plus, he tends to go full bore stupid at time. Like with the "birthers hate America" and "I love Bill O'Reilly" schtick..
Shut up Glenn. Some of us actually know how to think critically and you're not our guru.
Michelle, get off my radio, ya big dope.
Beck does not liken conservatives to fascist, he points out that fascists are the far left! Have you seen his political scale?
Theyre both pretty argumentative in ..lots of hot tempers around these days- including mine!
YOU PEOPLE!!!!!
How politically incorect of Beck to use “you people”
Michelle wouldn’t STFU.
He is ON AM radio.
He is a libertarian with a whiff of anarchist.
I listen to him, and his little chalk board charts pidgeon holeing various people based on one issue is the worst type of defamation. Not completely untrue but used to smear the Whole person. Watch out for this type of indoctrination. It is very dangerous.
However, on the issue of School indoctrination he is right on.
I don’t practice his type of wide brush insulting. He does have his good issues.
OH yes, he treats his audience like everyone is a bunch of school kid.
I agree he might simplify things, but he has to do that so that the publicly educated masses will understand them. I wonder how many people in America under the age of 40 knew that the Nazis were in fact socialists?
AMEN. Absolutely right!!!!!
Perhaps Massa is one of Beck’s so called “re-founders”. Wouldn’t that be a kick in the you know what?
Oh, man, Hannity has worn so thin on me. I wish there was something else to listen to at the 3:00 hour. How he maintains his audience is a mystery to me other than the fact that there’s just nothing else to listen to.
Beck is a good example of the old saying, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing”. He is finally finding out things most of us already knew, and acting like he discovered them. He has the enthusiasm of the convert and goes overboard at times because he gets so excited at his own “new” knowledge. I like Beck, but he really needs to calm down. He also needs to tell O’Reilly to STFU and stop mocking him.
So he should talk to only the most informed and leave everybody else out?
How easy we forget the two days of Limbaugh's show when he said he will be voting for Bill Clinton, after giving it serious thought. And then he explained the reasons why he thought Clinton was the better candidate.
90% of the callers did not get that the two shows was pure sarcasm, but callers one after the other told him they were not going to listen to him again. And he just let them hang there. It wasn't until the third day when he explained why he did that. If I remember right he was trying to prove that his listeners were not just robots with no mind of their own. But still it was a very very odd week in Limbaugh history.
No, Michelle was right! Beck spent the next 10 minutes apologizing. That gal is savvy and smart.
He was only apologizing for snapping at her. She wasn’t right.
+1 what you said ... right on the nose.
I test drove Beck for a few minutes at a time, and felt like he was preaching or talking down to me — just didn’t care for him or his style.
Rush I have listened to for as long as he has been on the air, and I am a longtime 24/7 member. Rush’s show is content, content, content, even tho he definitely has a showman’s/entertainer’s delivery, which I have no problem with.
NATIONAL Socialist WORKERS Party;
11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
Breaking the Bondage of Interest
12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.
14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.
15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
17. We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.
19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law.
20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.
21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.
22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.
23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:
(a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens.
(b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.
(c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the nonGermans from the Reich.
...........................
What we are up against.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.