Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economists agree: Tax cuts don't create revenue
Pioneer Press ^ | 3-14-10 | Ed Lotterman

Posted on 03/14/2010 9:06:14 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: Christian_Capitalist

The printed money is just another form of debt that the government borrowed.


81 posted on 03/14/2010 5:28:53 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
I’m not sure the peak of your curve is an equilibrium point. It looks unstable to me.

It's because the Laffer curve is drawn upside down with respect to economic "energy". The peak is actually the lowest-energy state for the economy - tax revenue system. Reduce marginal rate from that point, and the tax revenue decreases, increasing the "energy state" of the government. Increase the marginal rate from that point, and it increases the "energy state" of the economy, which naturally works to decrease costs, reducing tax revenue.

Just an engineer's take.

82 posted on 03/14/2010 6:56:52 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer ("It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Looks to me like it’s extremely difficult for the gov’t to stay at the max revenue point. OTOH, its makes it pretty clear which direction the gov’t should go if its not at the peak.


83 posted on 03/14/2010 7:14:30 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: noah

Would you care to comment on your blog about this video? I think you’ll find it quite interesting

http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/videos/laffercurve1-3/laffercurve1-3.shtml


84 posted on 03/24/2010 9:12:42 AM PDT by economicsforliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Exactly. From 2004-2007, tax revenue increases were greater than any 4 year period under Clinton. This was despite the Clinton tax increases and booming economy.


85 posted on 05/10/2010 4:37:54 PM PDT by MiltonFriedmanFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson