Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Heat Is On: Congressman’s Office Says Constituent Calls Are ‘Harassment’
biggovernment.com ^ | 3/19/10 | Capitol Confidential

Posted on 03/19/2010 11:46:01 PM PDT by Schatze

Yesterday, I decided to call Rep. John Garamendi’s (CA-10) office in Washington, D.C. He’s my representative and I wanted to voice my opposition to the Senate Health Care Bill. I spoke with a female staffer and politely told her that, while I support health care reform, I oppose the Senate Bill because it wasn’t true “reform.” She said the Congressman thinks it’s a good bill and that he campaigned on health care reform. I told her I knew that. I also mentioned that I voted for him. When I tried to give her specific reasons why the Senate Bill would harm our system rather than reform it, she refused to listen. She said she was very busy and hung up on me. Being the persistent person that I am, I kept calling back. Each time I tried to finish my point, she hung up.

I called one more time. This time she said, “If you call one more time, we will notify Capital Police.” I asked why my conduct warranted involving federal law enforcement agents. She said I was “harassing” her. I tried to explain that trying to convince a representative to change his or her vote didn’t constitute “harassment.” Before I could fully explain, she hung up again.

I called back. This time, I asked to speak to her supervisor in order to report her repeated hanging up as well as the threat she made. I was placed on hold. Thinking I was holding for her supervisor, I was shocked when a Federal Agent with the Capital Police picked-up the telephone.

At first, the Agent was curt with me. He claimed I was harassing Mr. Garamendi’s staff by continually calling after being told to stop calling. I asked him when it became a federal crime to lobby a congressman. He said that it wasn’t but it was a crime to “harass” congressional members and staff pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 223. I told him I was an attorney (which I am) and that I would research the statute he had cited.

After researching 47 U.S.C. 223, I called Mr. Garamendi’s office again and asked to be transferred back to the Capital Police Agent. The Agent picked up the phone and I explained to him that the statute he cited was not controlling since it only prohibits people from calling with the specific intent to harass. I further explained that I was simply trying to voice my concerns with the intent of getting Mr. Garamendi to change his mind, not to harass his staff. The Agent eventually agreed with my position and said he would call Mr. Garamendi’s office and instruct his staff that I was within my rights to call my congressman and voice my concerns.

After I hung up, I realized that this story should be told. Besides being an attorney, I’ve also had the privilege of serving this great country in the United States Marine Corps. Having seen the ugly legislative process the Senate Bill had been through, I saw this as not just another tactic to pass the Senate Bill at all costs, but also as an affront to our liberties.

While I’m fortunate enough to be able to legally challenge what happened today, others aren’t. The sad part is the democrats know this. They know that Americans unfamiliar with federal jurisprudence can easily be silenced when threats to involve federal agents are made. They know that most Americans don’t want trouble and they’ll go away rather than face the possibility of having to explain themselves to federal agents. That’s why I found this tactic appalling, as a Marine, as an attorney and as a proud American.

During my final contact with Mr. Garamendi’s staff, it was confirmed to me that he would vote for the Senate Bill no matter what. I was told that I was wasting my time by calling. Mr. Garamendi is a junior member of the House of Representatives. He was just elected via a special election last November. He has made it clear that he is willing to forsake his constituents in order to please the Speaker of the House.

Speaker Pelosi has said that she will stop at nothing to get the Senate Bill passed. She publicly stated that she would “pole vault over a wall” if barriers stood in her way. While that may be an amusing spectacle, it is indicative of what happened to me today. Apparently, threatening Americans with federal crimes to silence them is the latest tool in Speaker Pelosi’s dirty bag of tricks.

In the coming days, I’m sure more stories will develop illustrating the “win at all costs” tactics being employed by democrats. It’s these tactics that have appalled a majority of Americans to the point that the Senate Bill has overwhelmingly been rejected by the American people. When we try to explain that to Speaker Pelosi’s Caucus, we are threatened with criminal sanctions. We are told to shut up or face federal agents. Such treatment may be acceptable in the former Soviet Union, but it’s repulsive in the country I love and served. Is this hope and change?


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dictatorship; fascistleft; garamendi; healthcare; nancystate; obamunism; thecomingdarkness; totalitarianism; tyrant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2010 11:46:04 PM PDT by Schatze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schatze
The Heat Is On: Congressman's Office Says Constituent Calls Are 'Harassment'

The Heat Is On: Congressman's Office Says Constituent Calls Are 'Harassment'

2 posted on 03/19/2010 11:48:35 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod (New Wizard of Oz: Pelosi as the Wicked Witch of the West & Michelle as the Wicked Witch of the East.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

Well, Marine... forget the damn legal BS... We are past that nonsense... It is time to take up your RIFLE. The enemy is already WITHIN the gates. There is only ONE ROE... If it talks like a Marxist, fire for effect.


3 posted on 03/19/2010 11:52:51 PM PDT by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

A standard legislative bribe (”Cornhusker Kickback, et al) to these guys can’t cut it when they know a “yes” vote will get them turned out of office in November.

The only explanation that makes any sense is the promise of a cushy job/appointment for life after they get tossed out.

I just want to see one, one! dem congresscritter to get fed up and hold a press conference in the Rotunda cataloging the juicy offers he’s been made. Maybe even a recorded phone call from Rahm?


4 posted on 03/19/2010 11:53:39 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

I guarantee that if you notify Bill O’Reilly’s people (or Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck’s people) you will be on national TV.

Bill O’Reilly thrives on stuff like this. Send this story to him immediately; please.


5 posted on 03/19/2010 11:56:45 PM PDT by no dems (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

“representatives” like this guy and his staff need be ran out of DC on a rail - after being placed in stocks and publicly humiliated.


6 posted on 03/19/2010 11:56:45 PM PDT by jla (Obama & Co. vs. Jefferson & Madison - my money's on the latter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TCH
Well, Marine... forget the damn legal BS... We are past that nonsense... It is time to take up your RIFLE. The enemy is already WITHIN the gates. There is only ONE ROE... If it talks like a Marxist, fire for effect.

AGREE!!! It's time for a Revolution!!!
7 posted on 03/19/2010 11:58:34 PM PDT by no dems (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TCH

Call it in F O !!!!


8 posted on 03/19/2010 11:59:33 PM PDT by TheRevolution1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
I think they are supposed to keep a report of what the callers are saying So that the representative will have a record of what their constituents are thinking. Even something simple like 30% say yes on the bill, and 70% say no. Would at least give them some kind of feeling about what the public is thinking. I think hanging up on you was rude though. That is what those secretaries are supposed to do is listen to the people
9 posted on 03/19/2010 11:59:57 PM PDT by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

Yep, these democrat congressmen don’t have the slightest concern for their constituents. All they care about it maintaining a good relationship with the democrat establishment so they can get a cushy, high-paying job at some think tank or college after they ultimately lose an election some day. The liberals are totally corrupt now, with no concern for their country and the future of our nation. It’s all about them and their miserable little careers. They will go down in history as trivial people with no courage, no intelligence, and no leadership ability.


10 posted on 03/20/2010 12:05:04 AM PDT by your local physicist (If the Canadians and Brazilians can drill for oil safely off their Atlantic coast, why can't we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

You have more patience than I do. Also more legal training. As you pointed out most of us are not lawyers. I wouldn’t have been intimidated though. Federal law or not I would have told Mr. Capital Agent where to stuff it. They are acting like they are above the law. Do they think we’re not capable of that?


11 posted on 03/20/2010 12:05:12 AM PDT by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

Great work!


12 posted on 03/20/2010 12:11:28 AM PDT by Islaminaction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze
THE FIRST AMENDMENT Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


13 posted on 03/20/2010 12:15:14 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

Wow, that’s quite a story. They knew they had one smart cookie on their hands with you. Thank you for your service, and for sharing this story. God bless.


14 posted on 03/20/2010 12:21:46 AM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly (Liberals lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

I know G. He is a stuffed-shirt demo that would drink Nancy Pelosi’s bath water. The worst kind of robo-democrat that would do anything for the party & nothing for the country. Doesn’t surprise me how his office reacted at all.


15 posted on 03/20/2010 12:24:00 AM PDT by KhanKrum13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

It’s going to come to blood.


16 posted on 03/20/2010 12:32:59 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

Since when is it harrasment for people to call Congress?

It isn’t and this Congress yellow belly should be put on display for his lies.


17 posted on 03/20/2010 12:55:39 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

John Garamendi was on HIllary’s Secret Task Force and he is an advocate for single-payer. That’s what this bill amounts to and that’s why he is for it. He’d never vote against it.


18 posted on 03/20/2010 1:01:26 AM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KhanKrum13
Agreed. Garamendi is a haughty ass and the poster boy for career politicians.
19 posted on 03/20/2010 1:01:30 AM PDT by americanophile (DeMint/Ryan '10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Schatze; ex-Texan
More calls, more e-mails, NO to Obama-care!

Calling Dr Howard, calling Dr Fine, call Congress now!

20 posted on 03/20/2010 1:14:53 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never "free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson