Skip to comments.The Best Refrigerator Magnet Ever?
Posted on 03/20/2010 7:31:27 PM PDT by neverdem
PORTLAND, OREGON—There are limits to just how magnetic a material can be. Or so researchers thought. A compound of iron and nitrogen is about 18% more magnetic than the most magnetic material currently known, a team of materials scientists claims. If such magnets could be produced commercially, they could, for example, allow electronics manufactures to equip computer hard drives with smaller "write heads" capable of cramming them with more information. Other researchers are reacting to the announcement with caution, however, as similar claims about the controversial material have fallen through in the past.
A material's magnetism originates with its spinning electrons. Each electron acts like a little magnet with its field aligned with the axis of its spin, and when more electrons spin in one direction than in the opposite direction, the material becomes magnetic. For example, an iron atom has four more electrons spinning one way than the other. In a bulk material, the situation is more complicated, as the electron clouds of individual atoms merge into riverlike bands. Electrons spinning "up" flow in different bands from those spinning "down," and the difference between the numbers of highest-energy electrons in the up bands and the down bands determines the material's magnetism—which is smaller than one might expect from the magnetism of a single atom. Using such band theory, researchers can predict which material should have the largest magnetism: iron cobalt.
However, Jian-Ping Wang, a materials physicist at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and colleagues say that a compound of eight parts iron and one part nitrogen, Fe16N2, exceeds this limit by roughly 18%. The key to the material's extremely high magnetism lies in its complicated crystal structure, Wang reported here yesterday at the March Meeting of the American Physical Society. Probing their samples with x-ray, the researchers determined that within them, each nitrogen atom sits in the center of a cluster of six iron atoms and that a couple more iron atoms sit between neighboring clusters. The electrons flowing between the clusters act much like electrons in ordinary iron. But the electrons in the iron atoms in the clusters tend to get stuck, or "localized," where they are. As a result, Wang says, those atoms contribute more like individual atoms to the overall magnetism, driving it way up.
"If it's right, it's super important," says Eric Fullerton, a physicist at the University of California, San Diego. But he stresses the "if." As Wang himself explained, as early as 1972, others had claimed that Fe16N2 is extraordinarily magnetic. In the 1990s, researchers with the Japanese high-tech company Hitachi reported observations that seemed to bolster those claims. However, the evidence was problematic in several ways, Fullerton says. For example, some of the results depended on tricky estimations of exactly what fraction a sample's volume consisted of Fe16N2, which is metastable and tends to fall apart into other crystal structures. Others have not been able to reproduce the Hitachi results, Fullerton says.
Wang, however, says his team has been honing its techniques for years and can now reliably grow samples of Fe16N2. The researchers have also measured the magnetization with a technique called x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, which compares the material's ability to absorb x-ray light whose polarization twirls to the right or to the left. That measure is less sensitive to volume effects than earlier techniques and directly detects the localized electrons, Wang says. The team has also cranked out detailed "first principles" simulations that show the emergence of the localized electrons and make the whole scenario hang together, Wang says.
"He's been able to control things a lot better than other people," says Alan Edelstein, a physicist at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory in Adelphi, Maryland. Still, he hesitates to say it's a done deal. "I think this will be followed up on. We're going to know if this is right." At the very least, Fe16N2 continues to exert its extraordinary pull on the minds of physicists and material scientists.
Interesting! If you can increase the strength of a magnetic field, it can potentially generate that much more electricity...
The last thing I need is a Wang magnet on the fridge.
If this works and doesn’t have some unknown limitation (temperature, etc) this is amazing because it doesn’t use rare earths like neodymium (which are, not surprisingly, “rare”). I’ve read articles that supplies of rare earths might limit the growth of electric cars in the future. BTW, every hard disk made in at least the last 10 years contains one or two neodymium-based magnets.
A gassy magnet, eh? Who knew?
Yeah, now they can shrink motors and generators down without reducing power. Cordless power tools and remote control airplanes will benefit.
A very attractive idea...
You sir are doomed, if she figures this out.................
IT does NOT require exotic rare earth elements in its composition, of which, China controls 95% of the worlds supply via two mines in Mongolia. I hope they can do something with it.
So just hook it up to the light on the courthouse.
He’ll make a bundle selling refrigerator magnets... :-)
“Would it be possible to create a generator using them? As for the fridge, my kids’ artwork and all the photos are safe. REALLY safe!”
Yes, they are fun, but they are so strong that they can be dangerous (pinching fingers, for example). The metal is also brittle and if they hit each other too hard the metal can shatter and send sharp pieces all over the place.
Is it real and where can I get one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.