Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Is there a shift in US military thinking? ^ | 3/22/10 | YAAKOV KATZ

Posted on 03/22/2010 8:06:16 PM PDT by Nachum

Defense officials worried that Petraeus’s comments are harbinger of weakened ties

While almost a week has passed since Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the United States Military’s Central Command (CENTCOM) testified before the Senate and dropped his bombshell about Israel, concern within the defense establishment has only grown.

While the assumption among the top IDF brass is that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen does not support Petraeus’s widely-reported claim that Israeli intransigence was a problem for the US military in the Middle East and was fomenting conflict, the comments still worry Israel for a number of reasons.

First and foremost is the possibility that Petraeus’s comments indicate a shift among US military thinkers. While diplomatic ties between Jerusalem and Washington have traditionally known their ups and downs, ties on the military level have always been perceived to be rock-solid.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhodod; fifth100days; military; shift; thinking; us; usmilitary

1 posted on 03/22/2010 8:06:16 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama is also going to drop ties to Taiwan.

We have been selling the same amount of weaponry to them; only this year the Chinese have decided to make a big stink about it because they see the weakness of Obama. Next year, there will be a very minimal sale at the best to Taiwan, as well as severance of military relations with them.

2 posted on 03/22/2010 8:11:22 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

My Antivirus detected two attempts at malicious software on this site. I’m done going to the jerusalem post...

3 posted on 03/22/2010 8:14:12 PM PDT by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I think I’d go with Petraeus over Mullens. Someone wrote that what people think Petraeus said was not exactly what he did or meant.

Only time will tell.

4 posted on 03/22/2010 8:30:57 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Thunder90

“Obama is also going to drop ties to Taiwan.”

I’ve been saying the same thing for a year. It’s obvious. China will use Taiwan as leverage on us for them supporting reining in N.Korea. At least, that is what they will promise, and 0zer0 will buy it.

China learned the benefits of getting control of Hong Kong, and the next domino they want is Taiwan. Next China will force closer ties with Japan, S.Korea, and the Philipines. All by using N.Korea both as a threat, and a pawn that they can “control” for the “benefit” of the West. China will then be able to dominate all of the Western Pacific. All very easy to see if you just look at it. All very dangerous as well.

6 posted on 03/22/2010 9:58:53 PM PDT by SDShack (0zer0care = "The Final Solution" - Socialized Soylent Green Healthcare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

White flags everywhere...The second coming of the French nation is rising...

7 posted on 03/23/2010 2:44:19 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda; Nachum
I followed your link and read that part about abandoning policy of non-negotiating/non-communication with Hamas.

That brought to mind the event last year when Thomas Pickering had a secret meeting with Hamas. When that was reported in the press, Obama denied Pickering was working for him. Pickering served as Reagan's Ambassador to Israel so I guess it would be possible that Pickering was working for Israel. Either way, somebody is talking to Hamas.

Pickering belongs to the Realist-Pragmatist school of foreign policy and that group subscribes to the theory of "Linkage", that there are many problems in the mideast that are linked to the Israel-Palestine problem and can't be solved until the Palestine-Israel problem is solved.

One could draw a conclusion from the above article that Patraeus is a realist.

8 posted on 03/23/2010 7:22:26 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SDShack

Obama is also going to try and drop ties with Georgia, Latvia, Lithuana, and Estonia, and leave them to be reabsorbed by the Neo-Soviet bear.

9 posted on 03/23/2010 12:31:23 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson