Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrChips

I wonder what the legal strategy behind the joint filing is. To my legally untrained brain, I would have thought it better for each AG to file a separate suit in their own federal circuits/districts (or one suit per) so as to force the USSC to take the issue up sooner rather than later, avoiding discordant circuit/district rulings.


6 posted on 03/23/2010 10:16:42 AM PDT by kevkrom (Hey, IRS: can I simply "deem" my taxes paid instead of paying them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

They might consider that particular district court to be more friendly.


11 posted on 03/23/2010 10:18:23 AM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

I think the strategy for multiple states filing together in Florida is the speed and friendliness of the courts. More than likely they have found a friendly judge(s) that will expedite to the USSC.


29 posted on 03/23/2010 10:23:42 AM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (formerly known as Politicalwit ...05/28/98 Class of '98...PROCESS MATTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom
I wonder what the legal strategy behind the joint filing is. To my legally untrained brain, I would have thought it better for each AG to file a separate suit in their own federal circuits/districts (or one suit per) so as to force the USSC to take the issue up sooner rather than later, avoiding discordant circuit/district rulings.

The unified filing is being done in the rocket docket Federal court district that includes DC. The Virginia AG instigated it and other AGs signed onboard. Rocket Docket means it will land in the Supreme Court that much sooner

At the same time these same state AGs are filing in their own Federal courts, say out in Denver for the Colorado AG. Partly for regional publicity and acclaim and partly to mount a multi-pronged attack

134 posted on 03/23/2010 11:13:34 AM PDT by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

The whole outrageous bill is blatantly unconstitutional and it will probably be struck down by the conservative 5 in the SCOTUS. The federal government has no constitutional right to dictate to individuals that they must buy health insurance and that they must buy a certain kind of expensive “comprehensive” low-deductable plan that redistributes individual income to other people who get the same plan at a much lower cost. The whole thing is an unconstitutional, un-American outrage and assault on individual liberty and I will fight it for as long as it takes to repeal this monstrosity. The democrat trash in congress who voted for this monstrosity will pay a big price in November for their arrogance and lack of respect for free Americans.


184 posted on 03/23/2010 12:48:44 PM PDT by your local physicist (If the Canadians and Brazilians can drill for oil safely off their Atlantic coast, why can't we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: kevkrom

The Supreme Court almost never takes up a case without the lower courts ruling first. The only time they would is if there is some type of time issue. There really isnt with this because the insurance mandate doesnt take effect until 2013.


268 posted on 03/23/2010 4:59:25 PM PDT by jerry557
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson