Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russell Accuses State Republican Party Chairman of Collusion (PA-12)
The Kittaning Paper ^ | March 24, 2010 | David Croyle

Posted on 03/24/2010 11:09:55 AM PDT by smoothsailing

Russell Accuses State Republican Party Chairman of Collusion



March 24, 2010

by David Croyle

Harrisburg is talking about last night’s cable show in Kittanning where the Republican candidate for the 12th Congressional District accused the state Republican Party chairman of collusion.

Bill Russell ran two years ago against John Murtha in his last election in 2008, raising $3.6 million and earning an impressive 42 percent of the vote. Following his loss, Russell announced he would run against him again.

Since Murtha’s unexpected death on February 8, a special election will now be held simultaneously with the Primary on May 18. However, while Russell is already on the Republican ticket for the May primary, Republican insiders rejected him as their candidate to run against Murtha staffer Democrat Mark Critz of Johnstown in the special election. Although Russell already has a district-wide organization in place and excellent name recognition from his last campaign, the GOP conferees voted by a 2-1 margin for Tim Burns from Eighty Four, Pennsylvania in Washington County to run in the special election.

Russell, appearing on Family-Life TV’s Talk of the Town, criticized state Republican Chairman Rob Gleason.

“Unfortunately we’ve got a state Republican chairman who has a direct conflict of interest and really had no interest in, one, either defeating Jack Murtha when he was in Congress or, two, in taking that seat,” Russell said, referring to Gleason’s ownership of an insurance agency. “His direct personal interest is in keeping that the status quo. The direct financial interest is the fact that his insurance company writes the insurance policies for many of the companies Mr. Murtha used to bring in, and he has a vested interest in keeping the status quo for that. It is really unfortunate because, one, he has a vested financial interest in going against the Republican party, two, in a recent news interview, he attacked me for doing too well in the 2008 election because that caused Jack to bring out the Democratic forces including Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton for six robo calls,and Barack Obama. With the turnout of the Democratic electorate to save Mr. Murtha’s seat, he says that actually led him to lose a state legislature seat. So he was angry with me for doing too well against Mr. Murtha.”

D. Patrick Mahoney in The Washington Times yesterday also criticized Gleason and conferees, alleging Burns’ financial fortune that tops nine figures will enable him to self-fund his campaign and also contribute to other campaigns as well.

“It’s an unfortunate reality of what’s going on. As unhappy as people may be about what is going on in Washington, we can’t change things in Washington if we don’t first change the way we do things here in Pennsylvania. With the populist support I have had, I was 30 points ahead in the polls in the Republican running, I’m the largest non-incumbent fund raiser in the nation, but yet they chose somebody else with a 7% name recognition.”

Because the special election will be held at the same time as the state’s Primary election, it will be possible for Burns to actually win and occupy the seat from May until November while Russell wins the Republican nod in the Primary. If Russell wins the Primary and also the General election in November, he could still become the 12th Congressional District’s choice.

Russell, a retired 82nd Airborne officer and Iraq War veteran, seemed undaunted by the politics surrounding the special election.

“My focus right now is running in the Primary and winning the November election,” Russell said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: billrussell; burns; elections; gleason; murtha; pa2010; palibs; pennsylvania; politics; russell; timburns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: ncalburt

Run along now, we’ll call you if we need you.


41 posted on 03/24/2010 12:18:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
How could the republican party have handled it any better? Gleason did not pick the candidate. The state was not going to have a special election in the district. What could have been done differently? I'm sure that the process on the Democratic side was pretty much the same.

"I volunteered for Diana’s campaign, I live in the district. Both Irey and Russell ran virtually unopposed in their respective primaries. There has not been a competitive Republican primary in the 12th CD in years."

Both Irey and Russell are solid conservatives so we had a good conservative run against Murtha. We now have a competitive republican primary. I don't see why you're upset.
42 posted on 03/24/2010 12:26:07 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Here we go. Murtha’s rigormortis has barely set in and we’ve got the Chiefs leaving town and Republicans fighting with each other.

LOL! Ah, the good old days!

BTW, where are the Chiefs headed? I havn't checked up on Johnstown sports news lately.

43 posted on 03/24/2010 12:27:34 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

The Republican primary will be a real shootout, I look forward to it.

As for being upset, not me. I respect Russell for what he’s doing now and what he’s done all of his life.

We could do worse than Burns,that’s a fact, but we’ll probably never have another opportunity to elect a man of the caliber of Bill Russell.

Semper Fi, Marine


44 posted on 03/24/2010 12:34:22 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

ping


45 posted on 03/24/2010 12:56:04 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Only stupid, racists people support Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I’m with Russell. No reason for him to keep his mouth shut. He’s right.


46 posted on 03/24/2010 1:17:10 PM PDT by HonestConservative (When Injustice becomes law, resistence becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

You either know nothing, or are just making it up as you go along.


47 posted on 03/24/2010 1:28:19 PM PDT by HonestConservative (When Injustice becomes law, resistence becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

The truth hurts.


48 posted on 03/24/2010 1:28:58 PM PDT by HonestConservative (When Injustice becomes law, resistence becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Can you elaborate on your words?


49 posted on 03/24/2010 1:45:32 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative

Good post. We need more Republicans willing to stand up to the Gleason good-ole-boy gang.


50 posted on 03/24/2010 1:47:27 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

It is exactly like it.

Do you know where you are right now?


51 posted on 03/24/2010 1:53:51 PM PDT by HonestConservative (When Injustice becomes law, resistence becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Sergeant Tim

Probably on Gleason’s payroll.

I do agree that we have a bunch of lily livered, chicken shiites in this state, all kissing up to Gleason

Gleason is a major reason we had McCain and thus why we now have Obama.


52 posted on 03/24/2010 1:57:01 PM PDT by HonestConservative (When Injustice becomes law, resistence becomes duty. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Gee Dude , am I intrerferrng with your smaer campaign.
Gee Dude why dont you stop the lies and astroturfing Dude.


53 posted on 03/24/2010 2:01:57 PM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative; Sergeant Tim; jazusamo

I used to get amused when I’d hear PA “Republicans” throw around the word conservative and try to impress voters with catchy soundbites.

Not anymore, now I get disgusted. There’s too damn much at stake.


54 posted on 03/24/2010 2:03:07 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I'm surprised this should be such a controversy. It seems that party rules should be clear as to when to call a special election.

The party rules are clear.

For special elections, delegates from the district come together, hear the candidates speak, then vote for who they prefer. Burns got the nod.

The primary is proceeding like normal, and Russell is running in that - there's no need to get a minimum percent at a convention or anything like that.

55 posted on 03/24/2010 2:04:50 PM PDT by Crichton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Crawl back under your rock.


56 posted on 03/24/2010 2:04:54 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
thanks for proving my point .

the local gop followed the PA state laws for
special elections ?

no district in the country finances special election primaries .
too expensive.

57 posted on 03/24/2010 2:05:29 PM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

its hard to be outed as Smear merchant .

go astroturf somewhere else for Russell.


58 posted on 03/24/2010 2:06:21 PM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

so much for the CLOSED door insider bs BEING peddled here..


59 posted on 03/24/2010 2:07:33 PM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Well Russell and Rusert both peddled half truths in the media .
60 posted on 03/24/2010 2:08:58 PM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson