Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Health Overhaul Means for Small Businesses
wsj ^ | 3/24/10 | KRISTEN MCNAMARA

Posted on 03/24/2010 3:19:27 PM PDT by Nachum

The health-care overhaul that President Barack Obama signed into law will mean big changes for many small businesses.

Through a combination of penalties, tax credits and purchasing pools, lawmakers aim to boost insurance coverage for U.S. workers. How this legislation will affect businesses depends in large part on their size.

Beginning in 2014, organizations with more than 50 employees that don't offer affordable coverage will pay a penalty starting at $750 a year per full-time worker under the bill approved by the Senate and House of Representatives.

A proposal approved separately by the House, which still requires Senate approval, would raise that penalty to $2,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: businesses; health; overhaul; small

1 posted on 03/24/2010 3:19:28 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Did the requirement that construction firms had to provide coverage no matter the number of employees get left in?


2 posted on 03/24/2010 3:21:59 PM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

In other words, there are going to be a whole lot fewer small businesses after this goes into effect.


3 posted on 03/24/2010 3:22:12 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Again, the idea is to set the table for single payor.


4 posted on 03/24/2010 3:23:50 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This can destroy many small businesses. I suggest that where necessary wages be reduced to cover the cost of insurance.


5 posted on 03/24/2010 3:24:54 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Maybe there will be a whole lot MORE of them, since this bill includes a lot of incentives to shrink a business down to less than 50 employees.


6 posted on 03/24/2010 3:25:27 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Doom.


7 posted on 03/24/2010 3:26:21 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well, hopefully small businesses have time to prepare somewhat. In the past decades Americans salaries haven’t gone up as much as they could have because more people were receiving more generous benefits. I think businesses are going to obviously price this into their product while it will naturally be much harder to raise employee salaries.


8 posted on 03/24/2010 3:28:17 PM PDT by ATX 1985
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is a question to whomever might know the answer. If a business that currently has 80 employees splits into two separate companies, does this avoid the requirement? If so, there will be a LOT Of companies with 49 employees.


9 posted on 03/24/2010 3:28:17 PM PDT by Gapplega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The boom business to emerge out of this is medical billing companies. The companies with the computer programs and number crunchers to deal with the insurance, medicare, Medicaid and all the paper and red tape that goes with medical billing. Virtually all health care providers pay these companies to do their billing because virtually no one else has a clue how to sort it all out. These companies have a lot more business coming and the existing companies are in the spot to step up right now and do the job. For a hefty fee.
10 posted on 03/24/2010 3:32:35 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
A couple of other businesses with strong growth potential include law firms and accounting firms.

There will soon be an entire industry built around these firms providing consulting services to clients to help them circumvent the legal requirements of ObamaCare.

11 posted on 03/24/2010 3:35:37 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The 50th employee will be joining the unemployment line.


12 posted on 03/24/2010 3:38:14 PM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston
This can destroy many small businesses. I suggest that where necessary wages be reduced to cover the cost of insurance.

It's all part of the plan. We must gather millions of people to DC. Millions. This tyranny must not stand.

13 posted on 03/24/2010 3:38:55 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Our wonderful Senator Suzie Collins* has mustered the courage to state that she’s going to call for an amendment that would make the penalties to small businesses that don’t provide insurance basically a tiny bit smaller.

*There’s a great line at the end of the third scene of Rimsky Korsakov’s opera, Sadko where the hero bemoans the small mindedness of his wife, basically - “women, long of hair and short of brains.” Fits Collins to a tee.


14 posted on 03/24/2010 3:57:54 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
36 years and I am pretty certain that this will be my last in business... obama is literally killing us off.

LLS

15 posted on 03/24/2010 5:08:42 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Wolverine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Who defines affordable?


16 posted on 03/24/2010 8:44:58 PM PDT by AngelaAZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelaAZ

An excellent question.

After all, there is no rule to govern just what percentage of an employees coverage an employer must pay, at least from what I’ve read.

If that is indeed the case, all future increases can be passed directly to the employee. If the employer “offered” the insurance but the employee “opts out” in writing because the premium is outrageous (which is very likely due to the additional 20-30 million higher risk people being foisted upon the HMO’s, not to mention the obvious plan of adding illegals too), the problems will intensify.

Evenntually, with the payers opting out and only the high risk left on the HMO’s, they will die as planned. We’ll all end up getting our insurance through these “exchanges” which will meld into one big universal medical program that are efficency killers. We’ll be Canada within the next 6 yrs, and Cuba within the next 12.

This has been the plan all along, Obama knows it and so do all of his minions. They’ve stopped at absolutely nothing, ruthlessly destroying what took hundreds of years to build. And they wonder why there’s anger out there.


17 posted on 03/25/2010 1:37:11 AM PDT by Greenpees (Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson