Skip to comments.Obamacare: Viagra for Pedophiles
Posted on 03/28/2010 8:08:13 AM PDT by Kaslin
If last week's historic federal graft wasn't enough... If last week's groundbreaking request by President Obama for a t-shirt with the "F" word "emblazoned" upon it didn't do the job... If Bart Stupak's drowning in his $52 million dollars worth of requests for illegal pork for his district didn't suitably offend...
Then "never fear, because the worst of Obamacare is finally here!"
At least I hope it's the worst. Who can actually know?
Certainly not Congress, because they didn't even read the bill. Or if they did, then Sarah Palin's reference this week to "crosshairs" didn't quite go far enough.
Because nestled in the inner mush that is the new health care reform law that President Obama has been lying about to live audiences, (oh yes, I said lie--he's been claiming children with pre-existing conditions are covered, but oops--his fellow progressives forgot to include that! Imagine how that will play with the Congressional Budget Office's numbers...) buried deep inside the Congressional stew, is an unwillingness to ban Obamacare dollars from going to provide erectile dysfunction drugs for convicted pedophiles.
Without medical doctor Sen. Tom Coburn's amendment, there is no specific language to prevent Obamacare dollars from being used in such a fashion. And after the vote to reconcile, the law becomes, and shall stand as an open door to provide convicted pedophiles with sexual performance enhancing drugs.
So now, under federal law, because of votes by lawmakers who defied you in voting the 2700 page fiasco through to the President's desk, our tax dollars may be used to help convicted rapists, those who've committed sexual assault, and serial pedophiles to have sexual performance enhancing drugs provided to them.
It would seem sad, except for the fact that the Senate's only medical doctor, seemed to warn us all that it could happen.
Obama didn't listen to him at his fake bi-partisan conference, and the ultra-partisan democrats, in opposing the bi-partisan appeals to change direction, showed him the door at the request of such a common sense amendment.
Drugs have been a significant problem in the details of Obamacare.
The doing away with drug program assistance caused roughly a dozen major production companies to announce this week that they will have to forego any effort to be able to help their private sector employees purchase their prescription medication. Oddly enough the President, not seeing this coming either, kept touting another lie all week: that medicare would not be additionally burdened because the private companies wouldn't be forced to dump employees into the medicare program.
But that was before people read the bill, and the real program was unveiled.
Now millions more will be applying for medicare funds than we were told would be by the President.
Many have mocked with arrogance and tremendous certainty what President Obama and company have characterized as distortions in the description of his take-over of the health insurance industry in America. And on one level I tend to agree.
The distortion was grossly underestimated.
Since Tuesday of last week, we have daily awakened only to find program after program, policy after policy, bribe after bribe, and dishonesty upon dishonesty in a bill that was supposed to balance the budget, be completely transparent, and lift Americans out from underneath the crushing costs of less competition, tighter regulations, and more centralized control.
Turns out, it was all a lie.
Nary a piece of the legislation has been as it was touted. And leaving out children's coverage for pre-existing conditions until 2014, while actively campaigning in Iowa this week and saying that it went into effect immediately, seems to me a good grounds for the people of Iowa to file a class action lawsuit against the President himself. At least those Iowans who can't get children's medical insurance because of pre-existing conditions.
But Viagra for child rapists... now that's a horizon I don't think anyone saw coming.
Except of course... for Dr. Tom Coburn!
I heard RUsh talking about this. I couldn’t believe it but I know Rush doesn’t lie. It boggles the mind. I am LIVID! Leave it to Biden to use the “F” word in GLEE!
They didn’t read the dam bill!
Even the craziest Demoncrat wouldn’t find that acceptable. Pent up socialistic demand is pushing this for the Demoncrats. They can do whatever they want and they know it. The only way they can pass this evil bill is by LYING. Behind the scenes our MUSLIM, yes MUSLIM staffers are laughing their arses off. They are destoying our MORALITY and ECONOMY.
” If last week’s groundbreaking request by President Obama for a t-shirt with the “F” word “emblazoned” upon it didn’t do the job... “
What? Did I miss something?
When i heard this i thought it was some unintentional glitch. I hate the left, but i told myself this had to be some unintended consequence of some obscure clause.
But then oddly, they refused an Amendment to the bill that would fix it. It’s deliberate. They literally want to give sex offenders Viagra.
In november, they are going down hard. And i think they will actually be surprised. The next election,, the Kenyan loses too.
Your theory doesn’t hold water. It’s not about not reading the bill, Tom Coburn SPEFICALLY created an amendment to go into the RECONCILIATION package that would prohibit viagra for convicted sex offenders. The Democrats voted spefically AGAINST that amendment to the bill.
It wasn’t lost in the bill, it was voted DOWN BY THE DEMOCRATS.
But Viagra for child rapists... now that’s a horizon I don’t think anyone saw coming.
Except of course... for Dr. Tom Coburn!
And everyone else on the Right. But don’t listen to us. We’re just a bunch of inbred nazi, skinhead klansmen clinging to our God and Guns. We couldn’t possibly understand the nuances in this bill.
I’d use the /s tag but is it really necessary?
The part that really floored me was the matter-of-fact way the media reported that the republican amendment to that part of the bill had been smacked down by the democrats, as if it were a good thing.
Is is really that surprising. After the Government gives money for crosses dipped in urine and prisoner sex change operations, this doesnt sound to surprising.
The only good thing about this awful bill is that it’s a Republican campaign commercial waiting to be aired.
It’s not the muslims that are destroying everything, behind the scenes Satan is hard at work. The fight is not against flesh and blood, but against worldly powers, principles and rules of dark places. We must not forget the only way to victory is through Jesus Christ. With him all is possible and this assault on freedom and morality can be won through him.
My tagline reinforces your post.
Amen brother, I truly hope in these times that more Americans, and people from all over see this and accept the truth that is there for them.
Viagra? They need saltpeter!
Me, too. Emblazoned, lol. Not enough to screen print it. I had to turn off the TV and luckily was too busy too tune in much. Seriously? I guess we shouldn't be surprised.. Will Sesame Street now have a new spot on the letter 'F'?..
You guys are just looking at this all wrong.
It's a matter of wording.
You see... The amendment was meant to ensure that members of House and Senate get free Viagra through the National Health Care Plan.
Since most of them have concerns that they may one day get caught being pedophiles, they want to insure that a conviction won't interfere with their Viagra supply.
So.... the amendment was totally selfish, and wasn't even meant to apply to the general public (peasants).
Who were concerned that it might cause them to lose their 'free' prescription.
CRS: Health Law May Allow Viagra Coverage for Sex Offenders
By John Stanton
Roll Call Staff
April 7, 2010, 12:42 p.m.
The Congressional Research Service confirmed in a memo Wednesday that rapists and sex offenders may get federally subsidized Viagra and other sexual performance enhancing drugs under the recently passed health care reform law . http://www.rollcall.com/news/44956-1.html?type=aggregate_friendly
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.