Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSU grad wins $9 million in Wal-Mart suit
Chron ^ | 03/28/10 | CINDY GEORGE

Posted on 03/28/2010 3:04:30 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

A Houston woman who was wrongly arrested in 2008 at the Walmart in Meyer Park has won a $9 million jury verdict.

Nitra Gipson, 24, filed a civil lawsuit against the retailer after store employees accused her of trying to exchange counterfeit Walmart money orders for cash. She was arrested and spent two days in jail. The Harris County District Attorney's Office declined to pursue charges after it was determined that the money orders were genuine.

That meant Gipson had been falsely accused and falsely arrested.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: award; jury; texas; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: OldDeckHand

Appears to be a royal screw-up by Walmart, but $9 million?

I wonder what the jury looked like? I’m sure Walmart can/will appeal, right?


21 posted on 03/28/2010 3:29:44 PM PDT by smokingfrog (Free Men wil always be armed with the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy

Pac-Man? That’s hilarious. Reminds me of a comedy skit called ‘SBC Packers’ by Rex Navarette. I never could understand the joke until a Philippino friend of mine explained the trouble with pronouncing the letter ‘f’ and the letter ‘p.’


22 posted on 03/28/2010 3:30:55 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
ok, here it is real simple: the jury found her to be credible and sympathetic, and thought Walmarts actions were way out of line. Someone on the jury worked up the rest to sock it to McDonalds. Its called a verdict under the color of passion. Thats why most, if not all, states have procedures for dealing with these things. What doesnt get reported is how the case finally settles. Like everyone knows about the AWARD in the McDonalds coffee case, but they don't know that the ultimate settlement barely covered her medical bills.

I didn't read the article so I don't know the facts. If her attorney is smart, he'll tell her to take the half mil they will probably offer her.

23 posted on 03/28/2010 3:32:15 PM PDT by jdub (A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jdub

Thank you. I thought it would be pretty close to that.


24 posted on 03/28/2010 3:34:34 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

The arresting officer has no responsibilty here. Unless he is a forged document expert and knew the money orders were real and still arrested her. As it stood, he had a complainant (walmart) and they wanted charges pressed. It was a good faith arrest.


25 posted on 03/28/2010 3:35:52 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I thought Richard Jewel had passed on? He never got to enjoy the money which I think he deserved myself. He was heinously slandered on a national scale.


26 posted on 03/28/2010 3:37:10 PM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy
"I thought Richard Jewel had passed on? He never got to enjoy the money which I think he deserved myself. He was heinously slandered on a national scale."

He did, I think a couple years ago. But, I believe all of his lawsuits had been settled. I remember he settled with NBC, a NY newspaper and maybe CNN.

27 posted on 03/28/2010 3:38:56 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“Reminds me of a comedy skit”

Reminds me of my 9th Grade Latin teacher at Prep School. He was Dutch, had an accent, and had been in the Dutch Undergound. We’d get him to tellin’ War stories, and he’d tell us about the German Fokkers flying over. Only he didn’t pronounce it “Faw-kers” like we did. His first syllable sounded like “Fuh-!” He’d crack us up every time, and he couldn’t figure out why! Good man. Brave man! Good teacher!
Although Fokkers was a Dutch company, they were in Germany for a while, and then moved back, but were pretty much confiscated by the Germans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker


28 posted on 03/28/2010 3:43:59 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Good point about Jewel. If Wal-Mart would have been a Network News Org. or a daily rag and just reported this gal a thief and huckster, and then the report got her arrested and sued, she would have gotten nothing.


29 posted on 03/28/2010 3:45:06 PM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

basically, yeah. I believe Wal Mart owns its own bank for the purpose of clearing these transactions and the like. As far as the original story, 9mm may be a stretch, but I don’t have a problem with WM getting hit with a substantial penalty. Depriving someone of their liberty unjustly is a big deal to me, whether the government does it or some other entity.


30 posted on 03/28/2010 3:46:49 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
"I wonder what the jury looked like? I’m sure Walmart can/will appeal, right?"

Yes. They'll probably file a motion to reduce, remittitur or a new trial. Will that motion prevail? Who knows. I see a settlement (a handsome settlement) in my crystal ball.

31 posted on 03/28/2010 3:47:08 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
I'm kind of FOR the jury award, Wal-Mart is not trying to correct the situation and seems stuck on stupid:

“The main problem for Walmart has been the bad publicity,” Kelley said, adding that the retailer hasn't offered an apology, hasn't asked that charges against Gipson be expunged and has not revealed any company policy changes resulting from the incident.

Futhermore, she was the recipient of them in a car deal and even if they were fake just how much do we want to throw at a 24 year old for trusting them as a form of payment? Yeah, and how many of us are now going to exchange in commerce using Wal-Mart cashier's checks now??
32 posted on 03/28/2010 3:47:31 PM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
"The arresting officer has no responsibilty here. Unless he is a forged document expert and knew the money orders were real and still arrested her.

Wait are you telling me that if I accuse someone of something illegal in my store the police must arrest someone?

Sorry but Police have discretion to arrest and they should suffer for arresting someone falsely! There was no hurry, WalMart had the evidence and the police could have verified the crime before arresting an innocent victim. I mean someone did verify that the documents were genuine eventually so we know its possible.

The arresting officer should feel the financial sting too so the next time he/she will do some checking before arresting!

33 posted on 03/28/2010 3:47:43 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Never mind; Jewel did get something:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jewell

34 posted on 03/28/2010 3:50:57 PM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
"Wait are you telling me that if I accuse someone of something illegal in my store the police must arrest someone?"

Police can arrest someone under the standard of reasonable suspicion. Legally speaking, that's a pretty low bar. If Wal-Mart, the issuer of the negotiable instrument, tells the police that the money orders are counterfeit, that in and of itself constitutes reasonable suspicion.

Suing the police wouldn't have bore fruit, in my estimation. But, clearly Wal-Mart was defamatory in their accusation, and the jury made them pay a price.

35 posted on 03/28/2010 3:52:19 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

I got a Walmart money order a few months ago and it was drawn on a bank in Alaska, I assume is so it will take forever to clear.


36 posted on 03/28/2010 3:54:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: celmak
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jewell "

That's interesting. It appears Jewell sued everyone and their brother. He may have indeed collected more than $8 million. It's tough to tell as the settlements (mostly) aren't publicized. It's also interesting that one suit (Cox Communications) is still ongoing almost 14 years later.

37 posted on 03/28/2010 3:55:41 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
So they take your money and it's not big deal? Lucky the management was not charged for stealing. The bigger they are the harder they fall. They will pay attention next time. My local Walmart tackled a man on the asphalt parking lot in mid summer. Had him cuffed and left him on the hot pavement. He died. All for a pack of diapers.
38 posted on 03/28/2010 3:57:17 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Is it not exactly what the political class did to the American citizenry during the financial meltdown and bailout; all the while lining their pockets throughout the process! So, why should we complain about this person’s reparation.


39 posted on 03/28/2010 3:58:22 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
"I got a Walmart money order a few months ago and it was drawn on a bank in Alaska, I assume is so it will take forever to clear."

Nope. It will clear in a matter of days, not weeks. There are banking regulations that say the bank can only hold those funds for several days with 2 as the minimum and 9 as the maximum. It's called Regulation CC, if you want to research it further.

40 posted on 03/28/2010 3:59:39 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson