Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deere (And Others) In The Headlights
Business Exchange/Business Week ^ | March 26, 2010 | IBD

Posted on 03/28/2010 4:08:30 PM PDT by raptor22

As major businesses lay out the impact of ObamaCare in dollars and jobs, two things are clear: the costs will be enormous, and the president's vow to focus on "jobs, jobs, jobs" can no longer be believed.

Early returns on ObamaCare are coming in, and they belie proponents' claims of job creation and cost reduction. The costs will increase. They are merely being shifted to the states and to America's businesses, large and small.

AT&T, the country's largest telephone company, announced Friday it will take a $1 billion first-quarter charge related to the new health care law. The noncash charge has been triggered by a change in the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies.

Bloomberg reports that health care charges may shave as much as $14 billion from U.S. corporate profits, according to an estimate by benefits consulting firm Towers Walton. That's $14 billion that will not be available for expansion, research and development, or the hiring of new employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: obama; obamacare

1 posted on 03/28/2010 4:08:30 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22
$$$...as inflated as it is going to be.

We need a leader and soon.

2 posted on 03/28/2010 4:10:00 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Investors will be wise to exit stocks in most companies. The collapse is coming and unemployment will rocket even higher.


3 posted on 03/28/2010 4:10:56 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

And Congressman Waxman wants to drag the CEOs before his House committee and threaten them.

Henry - you’re becoming exactly what you’ve always said you hated!

You’re acting now like a fascist!


4 posted on 03/28/2010 4:11:13 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Depressing earnings per share means the overall market goes down. How long will Wall St. and average investors put up with companies being worth less than previously thought?


5 posted on 03/28/2010 4:12:23 PM PDT by misterrob (Have you tea bagged a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Herr Chairman Heinrich Wilhelm von Waxman has already scheduled a hearing before the Commerce Reichstag Investigative subcommittee for April 21, where these vicious enemies of the People will be impelled to produce documents to back up these false claims against Obamacare.

Guess who chairs that sub-committee...

Bart Stupak


6 posted on 03/28/2010 4:13:29 PM PDT by Bean Counter (I keeps mah feathers numbered, for just such an emergency...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

if true that these corporations were against

obamacare, then they would have lobbied for its defeat.

/s


7 posted on 03/28/2010 4:15:31 PM PDT by ken21 (i am not voting for a rino-progressive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Waiting for the first CEO to say, “Congressman, have you no shame?” Probably they wouldn’t get the reference...


8 posted on 03/28/2010 4:18:46 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

April 21st...anniversary of Greek military junta govenment take over


9 posted on 03/28/2010 4:19:02 PM PDT by spokeshave (They'll get my false teeth when they pry them from my sister's cold, dead mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ken21; All

They; like us, didn’t kniow what was in the thing. Didn’t Pelosi tell everybody that we’d have to pass the thing to see what’s in it? Now we are finding out.


10 posted on 03/28/2010 4:19:11 PM PDT by raptor22 (The truth will set us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
What is it with DemonRats and AT&T? First Carter has to break up the phone company.

Then Clintoon had to set the rules for the pcs hi freq 3g cell auctions. Despite what the consultants told him would work, he insisted on auctions going to small, regional cell providers, with an emphasis on minority and women owned businesses. No nationwide footprint. This resulted in a lot of small yahoos grabbing a piece of the spectrum in one area that was important to compleating a nationwide footprint. It took decades and lots of anti trust lawsuits before companies like AT&T (Cingulair) could get a decent nationwide footprint and provide service like Asia had for 10 years.

Now Obama wants to do this to AT&T.

11 posted on 03/28/2010 4:40:56 PM PDT by sportutegrl (VETO PROOF MAJORITY IN 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

>>April 21st...anniversary of Greek military junta govenment take over

Also the anniversary of the Battle of San Jacinto.


12 posted on 03/28/2010 4:50:42 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Anyone who thought that Obaamcare was what was promised was a damned fool.

The hidden costs of this bill have jumped right out of the starting gate in the first week of it’s passing.

Certainly the companies are going to have to absorb these costs, but in the end it is Middle Income people who will absorb it. That us folks, and this is just the begginning of the consequences of letting a Muslim and his cronies in the House run our government.


13 posted on 03/28/2010 5:01:28 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Strange how the Demo-Fascists shove this unknown behemoth at the Americn public, fully acknowledging that they don’t know everything in the bill, or what it will really do. President Bush tried to reform Social Security, but the Demo-Fascies said that there were too many unknowns (February 04, 2005|Janet Hook, [L.A.]Times Staff Writer).


14 posted on 03/28/2010 5:06:05 PM PDT by jeffc (I now live in National Socialist America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“And Congressman Waxman wants to drag the CEOs before his House committee and threaten them.”

I hope the Republicans come to the aid of the CEOs and question Waxman’s tactics. No free speech if you are a company or corporation according to Waxman.


15 posted on 03/28/2010 5:20:52 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

If these companies don’t stand up and tell the fedgov to get f’ed then they deserve whats coming to them.


16 posted on 03/28/2010 5:24:34 PM PDT by myself6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The reason these idiots like Waxman & Obama have no clue that companies have to take an accounting charge for the tax impact of the new legislation is (one) because they are career politicians and have never worked in the private sector, (two) have never understood the various accounting rules they impose on the private sector and (three) they don’t even think about the unfunded liabilities associated with things they create such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare


17 posted on 03/28/2010 5:30:42 PM PDT by kushnejz (It's good to see that bloomberg and his buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
We need a leader and soon.

We'd be better off with no "leader."

18 posted on 03/28/2010 5:39:23 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
But Dims have been all over the Sunday news shows claiming that Obamacare allows 100 percent tax writeoffs for all private drug benefits! IOW they're implying (though interestingly, not in the cases I saw, quite saying outright) that these companies will be getting a greater tax benefit than the subsidy which has been eliminated.

So, somebody is lying.

Hmmmm. Let's see. Would it be huge Fortune 500 companies, in required disclosures, which they could be legally sanctioned for falsifying, and which, as submitted, negatively impact they're profitability and therefore their stock values?

Or would it be politicians, who are motivated to cover their asses, and having been lying with impunity about the same subject for a solid year now?

Oh the dilemma!

(Still, even though there is obviously massive bullshit involved, I would like to know the putative basis for the Dims' claims about drug benefit tax writeoffs.)

19 posted on 03/28/2010 5:46:03 PM PDT by Stultis (Democrats. Still devoted to the three S's: Slavery, Segregation and Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

aka Fart Buttpak...


20 posted on 03/28/2010 6:41:24 PM PDT by an amused spectator (The money vampires fear garlands of lead & brass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson